298
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Before this story, I had no opinion on Perplexity.

Now I hope this product dies in a fire.

[-] Bosht@lemmy.world 175 points 1 week ago

Oh, okay. Well obviously fuck this guy. I can't imagine being enough of an asshole to see staff go on strike and your first thought is 'let me pitch my shitty AI!'

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 67 points 1 week ago

It's the entire point of AI, to replace the workforce.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

That's the entire point of capitalism. To generate as much profit from as little expense as possible. Unfortunately capitalism is predicated on a human workforce earning income to pay for goods and services, so at some point the economic engine will shutdown and capitalism will have killed capitalism. Either way, once the level of robotics + dumb AI is more cost effective than the available workforce in any role, that role will be eliminated. Once general AI is achieved and (especially once) the robots can build and repair themselves, the proles will either get star trek or whoever commands the killbots (including an AI) will rule humanity and inherit civilization.

NOTE: could happen at any time, but my bet's on it not happening for many decades; possibly not for hundreds or thousands of years.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago

If your entire workforce is ai and you don't have any humans then how do humans who don't have a job pay for your product?

The entire concept of replacing the workforce with AI falls apart when you spend more than 2 seconds thinking about it. Only way it would work is if we actually got rid of the entire concept of money.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're not thinking that far ahead. They're thinking "how can I make the lines go up this quarter?"

No doubt many of them understand that you need people with enough money to buy products or the economy stagnates. But they don't see it as their problem right now. Their problem right now is to make the line go up by any means they can. It's similar to how the owners must understand that climate change will fuck everyone if left unchecked, but they don't see it as their own problem right now, so none of them take any steps to avoid disaster. Capitalism doesn't contain mechanisms for coordinating actions towards the greater good. Instead it creates many "tragedy of the commons" type situations.

[-] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Corps have been complaining for years already that people aren't buying enough. Millenials are killing this industry and that industry because we don't consume enough - "enough" being whatever level they've decided we should consume. They feel entitled to our dollars, whether or not their product or service is any good.

If they were smart, companies would lower prices to be more competitive and incentivize people to buy more. Instead they've doubled down and posted armed guards at the store exits to intimidate the customers they have left. They've slipped data collection into every interaction. It's pretty obvious they're not playing the long game anymore.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No it isn't. It's the entire point of some (well, many) modern AI companies, granted. But "the entire point of AI"? absolutely not.

[-] natecox@programming.dev 150 points 1 week ago

Damn. I liked Perplexity. Sucks to delete it, but this guy can fuck directly off.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm going to have to try the selfhosted variants now. What a huge piece of shit.

[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago
[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

GPT4All and then any model you like. I like mistral.

[-] robalees@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Ditto! I run an old server, but would be willing to upgrade and self host a service instead of paying this ass hat any more money!

[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Okay, guys. Thanks!

[-] Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

OpenWebUI? pretty easy to selfhost and works wonders on my rtx a6000

[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

OpenWebUI says it's designed to operate entirely offline - that's not an alternative to Perplexity. I need online search functionality, that's pretty much the only reason why I pay them. I have offline solutions set up on my pc.

[-] Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

oh, sorry. never used perplexity so i didnt know. if you find a viable alternative tell me pls

[-] Disaster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

OWui has a search module which can be enabled. For me, running it entirely offline is more or less the draw. I think it also supports RAG search, although I don't know how "good" it is.. mostly I was just after a little magic box to play with.

Now, if only enterprise glass GPU's weren't so power hungry and expensive..

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Perplexica is one example. I also seem to remember there is some way to integrate it with SearxNG which is a self hosted meta search engine.

[-] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I just tried morphic.sh and ayesoul.com and both are solid alternatives I must say, although as I said, I just tried it so I'll see how it goes, I'll probably add an edit to this comment once I get acquainted with both.

[-] TherapyGary 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I see no reason not to continue using the free version without an account, as long as I don't encourage anyone to sign up. Does it benefit them in any way?

Edit: just for fun-

1000006185

[-] natecox@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

I assume that they’re still benefiting from your use via analytics and training data.

[-] TherapyGary 1 points 1 week ago

Ig that's probably safe to assume. I do use a VPN and regularly clear the cache/storage, at least, and only run it in a separate profile

[-] coolmojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You can use Perplexica instead, which is a self-hosted open source alternative to Perplexity.

[-] shadowfax13@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

for search & summarisation purposes i will suggest kagi, it also lets you customise the source and their priority. for everything else i have stopped using llm as i realised the productivity boost from them is not worth for the creativity loss i am getting.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Do you have time to talk more about the creativity loss? Concerning!

[-] shadowfax13@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

sure. my primary use had been writing code and had been using GitHub copilot for about few months, i noticed i was struggling to write “creative ” or non-trivial code. non-trivial part made sense as obviously having written all the smaller or easier pieces would give better understanding for solving the non-trivial part. the “creative” part was a bit more concerning to me. explaining “creative” code in general terms is a bit hard but if you are dev too then think of something like quick sort vs merge sort. both are equally efficient but quick sort is something that feels not obvious. with copilot infact i was likely to come up with insertion sort. another added benefit i had felt after stopped using llm was work seems more fulfilling despite having to doing things like writing tests and documentation on my own.

that’s the general observation but you can ask anything specific on this as well that i missed out on.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Very interesting. Thanks for that, I’ll reflect on it a bit.

[-] natecox@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah I’ve been a Kagi subscriber since they opened up. My normal usage is perplexity when I want details about a topic summarized and Kagi when I am looking for a website.

Kagi also has some ethical concerns; like a shitty attitude towards compromises to support human safety (refusing to add suicide prevention links comes to mind) but the perplexity guy just took it to another level.

[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 101 points 1 week ago

Ahh America. Land of the free, home of the Union busting corporations literally making robot scabs

[-] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

My name is Bender, please insert article subject and tone specs.

[-] PrivacyDingus@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

After many years of people misusing the word Luddite, it's time to bring back its actual meaning.

[-] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

fucking scab. and I liked perplexity too. won't be using it again.

[-] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 32 points 1 week ago

Wow, replacing striking staff is super illegal in France and I'm sure using AI instead of workers would still be a slam dunk in front of a court. I'm shocked that this isn't outright banned there.

[-] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

I guess thats enough perplexity ai for me

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 30 points 1 week ago

That is a FANTASTIC idea because AI is KNOWN to be SUPER STABLE and REALLY GOOD at what it's Designed to do! NYT will save a TON of Money fixing their DailyAI instead of Paying Workers!

[-] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago

Of course the one fucking service that's actually useful for me acts like this... Ig I gotta find an alternative now...

[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Have you tried Kagi? It gets you access to Claude Sonnet, ChatGPT, Llama, Mistrel, etc.

[-] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Does it do what Perplexity does?

Cross picket lines? /s

[-] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I haven't actually, I'll check it out and maybe add an edit to this comment. I have actually tried two others though, I found then via alternativeto:

  • ayesoul.com
  • morphic.sh

Both of these are pretty great candidates, they both have quality content formats and are somewhat more comfortable to use than perplexity in their unique ways, mainly due to minimalism. A drawback of both are that they are slower to answer but not excruciatingly slow.

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Cool. That's bound to work out really well. I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

[-] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago

cool, never using them again

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

What could possibly go wrong?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

If the New York times wants to continue to be irrelevant entity in the world than they won't take him up on that offer.

[-] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Are you saying that if NYT wants to continue to be relavent then they should agree?

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

No they're saying that the NYT (the fucking NEW YORK TIMES) is irrelevant and will continue to be if they don't switch to AI.

Which is even worse

[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

i bet something will go wrong.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
298 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59379 readers
3192 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS