joins the reddit-lite instance
mad that it's like reddit
leaves entirely instead of trying a better instance
I'm largely on your side here but
Biden literally vanishes for weeks at a time. Biden is a walking corpse who doesn't make any decisions, they have to stuff him full of Adderall to get him to do anything
Source? This sounds like Republican propaganda
And just to be clear- I feel that a vote for either Harris or Trump was a vote for genocide
Even as an american, I had to convert 0.01lb to grams to get a better grasp of its weight. It's 4.5g for anyone else curious
Do you genuinely believe that if you ask the average non-voter "did you want trump to win?" that they'll say "yes"?
I know they think it might generalize to other platforms, but there's little evidence to say so, and I doubt the percentage is nearly as bad on other platforms, especially Lemmy (which is the only social media I use, so the only thing relevant to me and many others here)
There's likely also a high percentage of people who form opinions about and comment on headlines without reading the content, but that's not what this paper measured
This article is about sharing links without having read the content, not just scrolling past or commenting without reading first
Edit: a more accurate headline would be
Facebook users probably won't read beyond this headline before sharing it, researchers say
A good chunk of those folks stayed home to say "we don't want any of this."
Arguing that that means they wanted trump is kinda like saying if you don't call the police after witnessing an old lady get robbed, it means you wanted her to get robbed. Maybe they just don't wanna participate in a fucked up system
Note: this does not necessarily apply if you're a cute femboy or twink. I still remember all of them
Tout est politique- les voitures aussi
Remember America, this is what you wanted.
No it isn't. Would be cool if people would stop saying that. Only about 30% of Americans spoke up to say they wanted this
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/18523112
(No cum)
(No cum)
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/18517823
(No cum)
(No cum)
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/18487318
(Meme is not OC)
Instead of framing it as a question of morality, a matter of logical consistency, and/or an environmental concern, I've started taking an amoralist/egoist approach and simply saying:
"The thought of eating animal products is gross to me, and I don't want to participate in the killing of animals when it's easy for me to avoid"
Which is quite hard to refute, because its about how I feel/my experience. They can question why you feel that way but, if you exclusively respond with 'I statements,' they really have no room to argue. I also feel that this is more likely to persuade people without having to actively encourage them- it has the potential to open an actual dialogue
What are your thoughts? Do you have your own method?
I know there's a new president coming soon, but I'm not worried about it at all, because I can 𝚁𝙴𝙳𝙰𝙲𝚃𝙴𝙳
ID: Bold multicoloured text "Be the reason why a fascist feels excluded, shunned, discarded, unsafe, and worthless."
Reference: https://sh.itjust.works/post/27787958
What insurance sees when you've lost your trashcan: