And now you asked more questions, but then told me to shh, so there are some mixed messages here
Gold
The restraint to not participate in the comments here is a marvel of human potential
I think you have virtue ethics and deontology backwards?
Edit: autocorrect
Fascists will not bring anarchy
If you're interested in further reading, the terminology for what you're describing is:
deontology (based on the action itself)
virtue ethics (based on the intent)
consequentialism (based on the outcome)
I would argue that there's no such thing as "good" people and "bad" people, nor even actions that are inherently good or bad themselves. Someone is, in my opinion, "good" if I feel more positively than negatively about the culmination of their actions, intents, and results.
To be clear though, my opinion on this is unpopular lol
Grail wrote a relevant article you may enjoy medium.com/@viridiangrail/so-you-found-out-youre-agender-because-you-don-t-understand-trans-people-886fdee6f178
Wow, that got weird
On the contrary, corrupt cops should be called out.
All cops are bastards
How is demonizing someone for their profession any better than demonizing someone for their sexual orientation
Lmao, classic
Ew, copaganda
You mean imagine getting to explain what this is every time
That's cute as hell
Oh shit new counter statistic just dropped
despite making up only 12% of local police forces...
triggered by Hamas' 7 October attack
Lol