530
submitted 1 month ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 87 points 1 month ago

Turns out, if you're further left than either realistic candidate (because FPTP), it makes it really easy to figure out who you should vote for. "I wonder if I should vote for the person who's not left enough for my liking, or the one is so far beyond that as to be the diametric opposite of left. Whatever shall I do?"

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 month ago

Well, the electoral college isn't actually FPTP, it's even worse than that.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago

You’re not wrong. I was keeping it simple.

[-] basmati@lemmus.org 22 points 1 month ago

Both candidates fall under the latter category. An AG that was a prosecutor with a history of perpetuating the war on drugs and arguing in court innocent men should stay imprisoned because prison labor is good for the economy, who was also vice president to one of the most right wing men ever elected?

That's literally the state half of the fascist alignment of corporate and state power.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] lengau@midwest.social 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, the "you're voting for genocide" argument is also ridiculous, as the choices essentially boil down to:

🔲 One genocide (with a potential of partial mitigation)
🔲 2+ genocides (and the one being even worse)
🔲 Don't care (in green)
🔲 Don't care (in yellow)

etc.

Genocide is bad. That should not be a controversial statement. I will use my vote to choose the least genocide that it has the power to choose, and I will use my other energy to advocate for less (and hopefully zero) genocide.

You don't have to like that fact. I certainly don't like it. But this is exactly what harm reduction looks like.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 month ago

This is just a monstrous reframing of a bipartisan genocide. Voting dem or voting rep is a vote for genocide, full stop, because they support the same genocide to the same magnitude, materially. Pretending Dems are better because genocide makes some of their voterbase sad is wrong.

I will use my vote to choose the least genocide that it has the power to choose

Then vote Greens or PSL.

[-] lengau@midwest.social 18 points 1 month ago

Then vote Greens or PSL.

Sorry, I'm not going to vote "don't care" on genocide no matter how many faux leftists pretend it's the morally superior option.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago

It's morally superior to vote for genocide but pretend your flavor of genocide isn't the exact same as the other flavor of genocide.

[-] lengau@midwest.social 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Look, if you don't care about LGBT folks, women who need abortions, asylum seekers, etc. you can pull that "don't care" lever. But "I care about making a symbolic, but ultimately toothless, gesture about Palestine more than I care about the lives of thousands, possibly millions of others" is what voting third-party is telling the system right now. If that makes you feel morally superior, we're at an impasse because I don't know how to explain to someone that an action to save lives is more powerful than an unrealistic gesture about saving even more lives, but which will realistically increase the amount of death and suffering.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Is there a red line for you in the sand, or would you vote for Hitler if 101% Hitler was running? When do you abandon hope in the Democrats, if being genocidal Imperialists doing nothing to help marginalized groups, and are running to the right of Trump in 2016 with respect to immigration, doesn't?

[-] lengau@midwest.social 14 points 1 month ago

That's a non-sequitur, because that's not what's happening by any means. But thanks for ceding the point that you're okay feeling morally superior by doing something that'll get more people killed.

load more comments (40 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 72 points 1 month ago

The US has two parties: center-right and far right.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago

(This is a lie internet lefties tell each other)

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 month ago
load more comments (23 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, this is literally where the U.S. falls on a global political spectrum. The Democrats would be considered center-right in most other nations. Even by their own historical standards, they're center right; if you took a Democrat from 1975 and transported them to 1995, they'd ask you why the party had adopted the Republicans' fiscal policies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml 70 points 1 month ago

I don't understand how the Democrats in USA can be considered left-wing. Sure, they are more left than the Republicans, but in my eyes they certainly not left-wing.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don’t know what country you are from or how your voting system works. But I will guess that your country has many parties and after the election, a governing coalition is formed.

In the US voting system, similar parties get punished by stealing votes from each other. So, in effect, we have to form our coalitions before the election and choose the single candidate that will stand for all of us. So, you can think of the Democratic Party as the Democratic Coalition, made up of some truly left-wing factions, as well as some not very left-wing or even centrist factions, and so our candidate will be much more watered down than what you’d see in a different system.

[-] DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

I am from Sweden. You are correct that my country has many different parties that together form a governing coalition.

Thank you for making it a bit clearer to me! I appreciate it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 month ago

You said it yourself, they are less far-right than Republicans, so Liberals get to pretend they are punks and rebels despite supporting the status quo.

[-] daltotron@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

basically, the US is a one party system, but it has two parties

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Easy. We set the FBI on all the actual leftists decades ago. So the movement is having to slowly rebuild itself in the US. As a result Progressives are the farthest left things most Americans have experience with.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Fickle_Ferret@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 month ago

The Left begins with anti-capitalism. If you aren't against capitalism, you aren't left.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago

Libs are seething at this absolute correct take. If you're pro free market, you're a liberal and thats as 'left' as you'll ever be.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago

Libs are seething, period.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 45 points 1 month ago

Won’t even draw a hard line at genocide

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago

It sucks. Liberals will be blaming Arab Americans going to Jill Stein if Harris loses, rather than Harris and Biden, just you wait.

[-] random 29 points 1 month ago

when they say they're left, but then they're authoritarian

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago

Marx and Engels were called "authoritarian" so frequently by their contemporaries that Engels wrote On Authority. What's considered "authoritarian" is a moving target, an arbitrary line in the sand just for people who succeed in revolution, or at least in throwing off western Imperialist powers.

If your argument is that Marxism isn't Leftist then that's hilarious

[-] random 15 points 1 month ago

my argument isn't that marx isn't left (especially since I've read his later works), nor that auth-left isn't left... just that I'm an anti authotitarian leftist

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

Gotcha, you're just anti-Marxist then. Can't say I agree with that, but that's less nonsensical than saying Marx isn't left.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] aiden@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago

Get your nasty political memes out of here

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 24 points 1 month ago

Fidel Castro and Che Guevara were ridiculously handsome dudes

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

Sankara too, holy moly

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago

Radicalization vs. sensibility

[-] SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't call Kamala a radical, but I guess I could see why you think that.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean she is very radical, in support of Israel.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago

"Sensibility" is maintaining a dying genocidal Empire?

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
530 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45655 readers
1260 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS