it just wants to keep you engaged using the platform, it will say whatever it needs for you to keep using it

i cant believe the Feds are blaming you for finding a vulnerability lol, rimu didnt even mentioned you in the post, what a fucking shitshow lol

is this mildly related to the other post from a few days about database simplicity/complexity?

i really hope deepseek helps change this, from the looks of it is way more efficient

i like how youre avoiding issues like carbon colonialism and ecological debt, or the common but differentiated responsibilities laid by the UN. but of course you need to spread your western propaganda

japanese formality system is not that hard, it's a couple conjugations and it pretty much doesn't change when it comes to gender, singular/plural, etc. it's really exaggerated how difficult that is. spanish doesn't have that many grammar rules for formality in that sense, but it adds another personal pronoun just for that.

also counters is also something shared among all languages pretty much. a school of fish? sure... it's just whatever word/ideogram the language speakers decided it was what's best to describe that group.

i'm not saying japanese is easy, just that some of those things are a bit not so much an issue as people make it seem to be. i am a native spanish speaker and i have practiced japanese for some time so i know a thing or two about that.

keep coping gringo

spanish could be considered harder because it has a shit ton of personal pronouns and a lot of verb conjugations based on formality, time, and a lot of other shit, so you need to remember a lot these which makes it quite hard. japanese has some verb conjugation but it's way easier in comparison to spanish. i say that if you'd remove kanji from the formulation spanish is harder, otherwise yeah, that complicates things a lot in japanese.

what happened?

what's a scenario where you could suffer from this vulnerability?

glad to see you're on our side comrade...

Use of AI tools for research and reverse engineering purposes is permitted. However, contributors are expected to fully own and understand all code they submit. Any communication with the team — including code, code comments, and GitHub comments — must come from the human contributor, not an AI agent acting autonomously.

We have unfortunately seen a rise in untested and unverified AI-generated slop being submitted to this project. This wastes maintainer time and, in worse cases, such changes get merged and break functionality for all users. Repeated violations will result in a ban from the repository. Please be respectful of everyone's time.

Pull requests opened by AI agents or automated tools must include a disclosure in the PR description stating the scope of AI involvement — which parts were AI-generated and what human testing or review was performed prior to submission. PRs that omit this disclosure may be closed without review.

If you are unsure about your work, open a discussion issue to talk it through with the team, or reach out to a maintainer on Discord.