japanese formality system is not that hard, it's a couple conjugations and it pretty much doesn't change when it comes to gender, singular/plural, etc. it's really exaggerated how difficult that is. spanish doesn't have that many grammar rules for formality in that sense, but it adds another personal pronoun just for that.

also counters is also something shared among all languages pretty much. a school of fish? sure... it's just whatever word/ideogram the language speakers decided it was what's best to describe that group.

i'm not saying japanese is easy, just that some of those things are a bit not so much an issue as people make it seem to be. i am a native spanish speaker and i have practiced japanese for some time so i know a thing or two about that.

keep coping gringo

spanish could be considered harder because it has a shit ton of personal pronouns and a lot of verb conjugations based on formality, time, and a lot of other shit, so you need to remember a lot these which makes it quite hard. japanese has some verb conjugation but it's way easier in comparison to spanish. i say that if you'd remove kanji from the formulation spanish is harder, otherwise yeah, that complicates things a lot in japanese.

what happened?

what's a scenario where you could suffer from this vulnerability?

yes! competition! that's what makes capitalism great!

i hope they dont, so that their shitty software dies to hell

what deck do you play then? im using magnezone/ex

glad to see you're on our side comrade...

i understand where you're going but that it's because we're fucked up by capital, but once you get past that... i don't see china having a lack of beautiful architecture that blends modernity with traditional style and everything in between. sure, if the us decides to build housing for the people, do whatever you can to make that possible, but it's not like we only need to do that.

i much prefer what china does with these kind of people. i didnt read what's going to happen to her specifically, but i'm sure a couple millions to the judge, she's out in 2 years and she'll do some similar shit

Use of AI tools for research and reverse engineering purposes is permitted. However, contributors are expected to fully own and understand all code they submit. Any communication with the team — including code, code comments, and GitHub comments — must come from the human contributor, not an AI agent acting autonomously.

We have unfortunately seen a rise in untested and unverified AI-generated slop being submitted to this project. This wastes maintainer time and, in worse cases, such changes get merged and break functionality for all users. Repeated violations will result in a ban from the repository. Please be respectful of everyone's time.

Pull requests opened by AI agents or automated tools must include a disclosure in the PR description stating the scope of AI involvement — which parts were AI-generated and what human testing or review was performed prior to submission. PRs that omit this disclosure may be closed without review.

If you are unsure about your work, open a discussion issue to talk it through with the team, or reach out to a maintainer on Discord.