I'm not the one murdering them, quite literally. Just like in real life, there is no mystical unstoppable force of nature in play. It's another person, like you. Their choices aren't your choices.
To put it another way, if you sold a kid a bike and he later crashes and dies despite the bike having no faults, are you responsible? Most would correctly identify that you are not responsible in that scenario, as the kid is responsible for what they did with the bike.
There already has been no restraint from Biden. Genocide is genocide, and Harris supports genocide.
I'm not voting for genocide, there is no moral argument to do so.
Well of the two candidates, Harris actually receives untraceable funding, and no Russian funds have been linked to stein.
Democrats have no interest in democracy or anything that weakens their corporate power, like rcv/star/democratic voting methods.
It's almost as if NK doesn't want war. Weird how they took a defensive posture in response to invasion of their territory by a country backed by the most war hungry country in the history of humanity.
I don't think any undecided voters are going to be moved by Michelle Obama, the definition of "only mildly appealing to center right wine moms as a vague topic of conversation."
The man who appointed Hitler wasn't a fascist.
I'm sure the Nazis that just voted felt the same way.
Obama still proving black men can be as racist as whites.
Have fun in international court.
Exactly, you think being a murderer is okay.
That is the core philosophical difference.
You are completely okay with killing innocent people. These people are not, normal people are not.
This difference cannot be reconciled. These people will never think the way you do, and thank every God ever imagined for that, as someone needs to be the moral party if only as an example of how normalized and justified pure evil is.
How is being genocided without restraint better than being genocided without restraint?