497
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

I thought this was dumb as fuck, but I think I understand what Microsoft is trying to do here.

What might not be obvious is that this "Windows" app is for iOS, Android and Linux - yes, it's a replacement for remote desktop but it's specifically a remote desktop app to connect to Windows machines.

So while I still this this rebranding is entirely unnecessary, I can see that they are trying to clearly distinguish "I'm not on windows and I need to do something on windows so I'll use the windows app for that" .

It also means less confusion when "remote desktop" doesn't let you connect to your Mac or whatever.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

One year from now: web search "Windows App broken" and then starting cutting myself.

[-] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Something tells me the community forums will still refer to it as remote desktop or RDP anyway

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

But not all Windows apps can be run via Wine, at least some apps related to some tools I’ve had to use were not available

[-] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You can if it's a protable software, you can "acquire" portable softwares on appnee

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago

Then spin up Windows in a VM. It is painless and has unattended installation

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Is this like windows in a window, windows in the cloud, or a dual boot situation?

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

It's like Windows in a window. Not just Windows, but you can run many other operating systems in a VM too.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Yup that’s what I do

Edit to say that there’s some mouse drivers which don’t work in a VM, at least from my experience but maybe I didnt try hard enough

[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 1 points 20 hours ago

True I wanted to run affinity I couldn't do it I apparently need a custom version of wine

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Ya but they won't run in that app either I bet (like photoshop or 3dsmax).

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Maybe, I’d like to see if there’s a difference, but you’re probably right

[-] SnotFlickerman 97 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's really more like Remote Desktop+. It has some additional "features" (slight retch) on top of traditional Remote Desktop features.

Let's wait and see if it's actually more secure than traditional Remote Desktop.

(and I'd still rather use Wine)

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

Did they invent X11 Forwarding over the network?

[-] Samsy@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 day ago

Btw. when we get wayland forwarding over Network?

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 31 points 1 day ago

waypipe exists, but it's still not perfect.

[-] Samsy@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

Never heard about this. Thx.

[-] d_k_bo@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago

Unlike X11, Wayland was never intended to be network transparent. As others say, solutions like waypipe and more tradionally RDP and VNC exist.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] db2@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Btw. when we get wayland ~~forwarding over Network~~?

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

/c/foundthenvidiauser

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

X11 can render individual windows (Xclients) through the network on another Xserver since decades. With XPRA you can even buffer them, to move them from one Xserver to another or make sure they survive network disconnect. It's very cool, but not widely used.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] germanatlas 37 points 1 day ago

What the fuck is that title

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Some journalist memeing

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uranibaba@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago
[-] cheddar@programming.dev 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As I understood this is some remote running layer, while WINE is an emulator.

[-] Bezier@suppo.fi 55 points 1 day ago

WINE is an emulator.

ಠ_ಠ

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Wine Is Nothing but an Emulator

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago

Wine Is Naturally an Emulator

[-] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Wine Is naturally Not an Emulator

WINE

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fluxc0@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Oh dear cheddar, what does WINE stand for?

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 28 points 1 day ago
[-] prole 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

(best quality I could find)

[-] notaltaccountlol@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 20 hours ago

Wine's Independent New Energy

[-] witty_username@feddit.nl 21 points 1 day ago

Let me guess. It won't support directx calls?

[-] infeeeee@lemm.ee 39 points 1 day ago

It's a remote desktop client, so it won't. OP read only the title of the article

[-] RelativeArea0@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

HyperV4every1 version whateverthefuckitis

[-] partizan@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Sounds awful lot like Citrix...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
497 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20774 readers
962 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS