533
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago

Did they invent X11 Forwarding over the network?

[-] Samsy@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 month ago

Btw. when we get wayland forwarding over Network?

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 37 points 1 month ago

waypipe exists, but it's still not perfect.

[-] Samsy@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

Never heard about this. Thx.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago

Neither was X11 so it's in good company

[-] db2@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Btw. when we get wayland ~~forwarding over Network~~?

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

/c/foundthenvidiauser

[-] d_k_bo@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago

Unlike X11, Wayland was never intended to be network transparent. As others say, solutions like waypipe and more tradionally RDP and VNC exist.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

Exactly. We won’t. We’ll get specialized video stream over network. I’m not happy about this regression. I understand that was a willing sacrifice to achieve better local performance, but I’m not sure it was worth it.

[-] MinFapper@startrek.website 7 points 1 month ago

Their reasoning was that X11 network transparency had been broken for quite some time. If you tried running chrome, most games, or anything with modern hardware acceleration over X11 forwarding, they wouldn't work.

So, IMHO waypipe is actually an improvement in terms of compatibility, rather than a regression.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

You always had the option to send frames over the net using VNC and such. But for many use cases, X over SSH was absolutely fantastic.

I remember using it on a very basic DSL connection to work remotely back in 2005, and it was almost like running local. You don’t get anywhere near the same performance with VNC or RDP.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

It’s more about security if I recall correctly

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

How so? Is there a way for malicious code to start injecting itself into calls to 127.0.0.1?

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sorry, I am not an expert myself, but I think there are some recourses about that in the internet

Or, this file on x.org:

“But the X protocol is still unsecure by design…”

https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2014/XDC2014DodierPeresSecurity/xorg-talk.pdf

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, to send it naked over the wire would be nuts, which is why everybody uses SSH. But unless there’s insecurity within the computer, that’s a moot point.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

X11 can render individual windows (Xclients) through the network on another Xserver since decades. With XPRA you can even buffer them, to move them from one Xserver to another or make sure they survive network disconnect. It's very cool, but not widely used.

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 10 points 1 month ago

Yes, the ssh -X flag forwards it.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I doubt it's nearly as secure as OpenSSH though.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

it goes through an SSH tunnel

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
533 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
1058 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS