147
submitted 10 months ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

They finally busted him. Russell Laiosa. I know the NY Post is a rag, but it's the first article I found confirming an arrest.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Unpopular opinion: Anyone that does repossessions of any kind is a class traitor. Let the rich collect their own debts.

[-] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 19 points 10 months ago

It'd be fun to see some lady in a suit hooking a Dodge Ram to a tow truck as fast as she could.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 10 months ago

This guy parked in a no parking zone. This wasn't a repo.

[-] deltapi@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

And allegedly had over $1300 in parking and other related fines unpaid

[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Idiots shouldn't buy things they can't afford. I have no sympathy for someone that buys a gigantic overpriced truck and gets it repossessed because they're not paying the bill.

[-] Steve@startrek.website 9 points 10 months ago

They’re being paid to do a job

[-] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 10 months ago

So were the Pinkertons. That doesn't mean it's morally justified.

[-] figjam@midwest.social 19 points 10 months ago

Another unpopular opinion. If you borrow money, pay it back. Regardless of who loaned it to you.

[-] SoJB@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Damn life must really be easy for you with such a simple mind

[-] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah why would anybody agree to make life more difficult merely for moral superiority that doesn't do much?

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

You're really going to invoke the Nuremburg defense for a vehicle theft?

[-] Steve@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago

Recovery, not theft. Be an adult.

[-] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago

Do you really expect bankers to jump in a truck to find cars? Do you really want to deny someone that employment?

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Forcing bankers to do it would really advance tow truck technology much faster.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

unpopular opinion: On street parking is a mistake.

It creates problems like this and takes way too much policing to prevent streets from looking like dumps, disrupts visibility and results in overly large streets that require oversized, polluting stormwater solutions while limiting space for buildings and people.

[-] einlander@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

The problem with removing on street parking is the cars have to go somewhere, most likely larger parking lots. Now if they made more bike lanes and better public transportation alternatives we wouldn't have this problem.

[-] lapping6596@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

I haven't dived into the article, but it is about NYC where public transit is good enough that owning a car just isn't necessary like most of the US.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Depends on if you work or live in Jersey or the surrounding suburbs

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Multi story parking structures exist.

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

On-street parking even exists in Amsterdam, it's definitely less than in cities with less bike lanes/sane infrastructure but there's still some pretty much everywhere.

[-] MightyCuriosity@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I mean they're starting to implement car-less city centers. Im all for it! Have a big (free) car park near a train/metro station and take public transport into the center.

[-] PixelTron@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago

I think I saw a documentary about a similar incident recently… it had two sports drink salesman in a minotaur truck badly parked getting towed & they drove it away while still attached & crashed. Long story short they had to do community service looking after kids to be role models & hilarity ensued…

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Please, what is the name of the documentary?

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Thank you!

Edit:

spoiler

Oh, I get it now.

[-] Tiefa@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Taste the beast!

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Wow a Role Models comment in the wild

[-] FundMECFSResearch 17 points 10 months ago

can we not post right wing tabloids

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 10 months ago

I try to avoid low-quality publications. But hey, sometimes they have the scoop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CTDummy@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

“He said the tow truck was unmarked, the guy made threatening comments to him and he thought the guy was robbing his truck,” he told The Post.

Oh yes, the guy getting towed totally thought he was getting robbed. A car thief that brought a… tow truck. In broad daylight. Is there a gang a car thieves out there intentionally trying to get locked up? Or is this as shit a cope for a 55 year old as it sounds?

[-] samothtiger@pawb.social 11 points 10 months ago

Let’s be real, towing a car is theft.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 18 points 10 months ago

I feel like maybe you aren't actually familiar with the issue you're commenting about here. Maybe you should read the article and watch the video before defending this guy.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 15 points 10 months ago

Maybe if you're a legitimate tow truck operator you should have details on your truck and try really hard not to threaten the owners of vehicles you ~~steal~~ tow.

But let's also be clear this truck owner acted like a truck owner and everything went exactly as well as you could expect.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah I mean, the towtruck owner was not without fault by all I've read but even so, the guy stole a truck and caused a lot of property damage and that's a jailable offense no matter the circumstances.

[-] walden@sub.wetshaving.social 9 points 10 months ago

This was a repossession, so unless the repo guy made a mistake they were really far behind on payments. For a car to get repossessed, the loaner needs to get to the point where they know there's no way they're ever getting their money. They would much rather have the guy try and catch up on payments, maybe come to some sort of repayment plan, even something reduced from the original loan, etc. They want money, not a truck.

Otherwise, boots are definitely the way to go if possible, but most of the time a car gets towed because its parked illegally and shouldn't be there. You can't just move it off to the side, so they have to take it to the tow place. It's expensive and it sucks, but I don't know of a better solution.

[-] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

and toeing the car is a fetish.

[-] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Let's be real parking illegally or not paying your debts is bad.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 10 months ago

Towing a vehicle like that is definitely criminal.

[-] anton 2 points 10 months ago

We should just set fire to cars parked illegally instead.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

this doesn't solve the problem of the car taking up the parking spot (or whatever the offense was that's getting it towed from the lot.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I don't think we do a very good job of handling vehicle delinquency.

If you don't pay for your vehicle it's down to the company that you owe the money to to get it back. If you don't pay them, and you don't get caught, there's almost no downside for you. If it was a jailable offense it would happen a lot less often we would be able to remove the entire repo industry.

[-] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 10 months ago

So you're advocating for like... A debtors' prison?

[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Sounds like he wants a debtor’s prison, indeed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Did I say prison? Because I'm pretty fucking sure I didn't say prison.

We don't need bounty hunters in society. Using a bounty hunter to recover someone's property who didn't pay for it is the worst, well second worst outcome.

Right now there is no straightforward repercussion for it. If you sign up for a loan to buy a car you sign up for an agreement to pay a bank. A car is not a primary possession they are allowed to recover their product. They are allowed to hire some lowlife who can afford a tow truck to come and try to steal it from you. We're just begging for people to shoot people.

How about the company who owns the truck gets a warrant to recover the truck, you hand over the truck, or you go to jail to await trial and post bail if you can. There's simply no freaking way you can say that that's better than hiring a bounty hunter to come and steal your shit.

[-] catchy_name@feddit.it 2 points 10 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
147 points (100.0% liked)

News

31130 readers
2833 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS