275
Wasn't it Laura Loomer, who started the whole Kamala gave BJs to get to her position? I guess it was truly just projection.
🌎🧑🚀🔫👨🚀
Still gross to make that accusation about someone as reprehensible as Loomer. And it let's Trump off the hook. She's not traveling with him because of sexual favors, she's traveling with him because he supports her insane views.
Just because she's a horrible person doesn't mean he's not also taking advantage of her. After all, "When you're a star, they let you do it..."
It's not a gross accusation when it's a gross truth.
Right, but do you have any evidence? Otherwise it's just an accusation
She has apparently been spending some nights at Mar-a-Lago IIRC, and has also been traveling with him in his jet. Theres also quite a few pictures of them being really close. Sure, we don't have video of them having sex, but it's about as obvious as it can be without that. We all know how much Trump likes to take advantage of women and also likes sycophants, so it'd only make sense that he takes her in.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
“Traveling” 🤨
Yeah, that word is doing some real heavy lifting here.
How so? On his plane multiple times.
I've not heard it called that before.
Oh right, didn't get what was intended first time.
Walmart Stormfront
More like Firecracker I think.
I am really good at recognizing faces but every time I see a new pic of this lady I’m, "who the fuck is this?"
But the answer seems to be, a racist asshole.
I had never heard of her until this week. To me, she looks like they took pictures of every woman Trump is known to have been attracted to in his life, made an AI mashup of all of them, and dyed her hair dark just to throw us all off.
To be fair, with all the work she's had done she probably does look different every time you see her.
She's only 31.
Let that sink in.
Her face is fascinatingly odd and . . upsetting.
Born in Arizona in 1993, the self-styled investigative journalist has worked as an activist and commentator for organisations including Project Veritas and Alex Jones's Infowars.
BBC, don’t get played, man. That restraint you show with “self-styled” is just creaking terribly. Personally I would have gone with “considers herself” or “claims to be . . . despite [the obvious]”. Yeah yeah “objective”, look whatever you gotta tell yourself, man.
Self-styled means “that’s what she calls herself”. Otherwise they would not include the qualifier.
It’s also a “journalistically accepted” way to say “no she isn’t” while allowing that yes, she may be. My point is that they should lean harder into flat-out saying “no she isn’t”.
She's he's new cock socket. We all know it and see it. But the evangelical Christians will explain it away.
Can Trump even get it up?
That's why I said socket and not sleeve
Reminds me of Melisandre from Game of Thrones tv-series (havent read the books).
Red haired witch that acts as kings counselor.
Funny you said that. I saw her photo in the thumbnail, thought the same thing, and went down a Game of Thrones rabbit hole, came back, scrolled down and found your comment. Trump isn’t exactly a Stannis though.
I think that's giving her (and him) far too much credit. This is more like a couple of mentally unwell drifters hooking up in an alley in between grifting.
Didn’t Milesandre councel someone to burn their own daughter in sacrifice to a battle that guy lost?
The saga of Laura's "slashed" tire.
It's always amazing to me when these idiots show up in public again after something like that.
Oh, I remember this bitch now.
That was hilarious.
She "outed" Lindsey Graham too
Jewish white supremacists crack me up..
Her and Stephen Miller should get married. It would save us all a lot of trouble of having to deal with them because they'd be too exhausted from out-crazying each other.
looming lunatic
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
275 points (100.0% liked)
politics
24707 readers
2696 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS