296
submitted 1 month ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 98 points 1 month ago

The #1 thing to note is that Trump didn't win the last debate, Biden lost it. There's a difference.

Trump's performance was inchoate, but Biden looked like a lost little boy and that's something the leader of the free world can't recover from.

Harris is not going to have that problem.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I don't see Harris ending an answer with "we finally beat Medicare."

I think I had an aneurysm that night.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Me too, and that was just from my friend group sending despairing texts to each other because half of them were watching it. I couldn’t bring myself to watch it myself because I was afraid of how Biden would do, and my concerns were fully justified.

So glad the DNC was able to pull out of that tailspin.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Debates mean nothing in presidential elections. Several losers have won and winners have lost in the past.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

And some led to candidates dropping out.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 66 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“I think he’s gonna lie…”

Does ~~a bear shit in the woods~~ Trump shit in his pants?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 1 month ago

“Does the pope protect pedophiles?”

[-] tiefling 7 points 1 month ago

Does ~~a bear shit in the woods~~ Trump shit in his ~~pants~~ adult nappy?

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 month ago

I'd say "he's gonna lie" is the free space on the bingo but there's a lot of competition...

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago
[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

The Trump bingo card is actually a 3d block with a six sided free spot.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago
  • something racist
  • something sexist
  • accordion hands
  • stupid nickname
  • bigly / the best
  • ”Our great, great . . .”
[-] Kadaj21@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Came to me crying saying “sir….”

[-] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Big man, strong man, tears running down his face...

[-] antaymonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I can't not hear Seth Meyers.

[-] downhomechunk@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

Are we doing bingo or a drinking game?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Whatever Gets You Through The Night

It's all right

It's all right

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago

She needs to hammer him on his rich tax cuts and the state he left the economy in. There way too many people who believe everything was better under Trump and only care about money and earning.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago

I really want "Under your administration, people didn't know where their next roll of toilet paper was coming from..."

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

That is what needs to be repeated. Every conservative has forgotten that.

[-] downhomechunk@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

That was China's fault, or the democrats. Not Trump. Remember when he went to Puerto Rico and threw rolls of paper towels at hurricane survivors?

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

In other news: The ocean is salty

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Debate hype is at 11.

Vice President Harris on debating Trump: "He plays from this really old and tired playbook, right? There's no floor for him in terms of how low he will go and we should be prepared for that. We should be prepared for the fact that he is not burdened by telling the truth, and we should be prepared for the fact that he is probably going to speak a lot of untruth." Via The Rickey Smiley Morning Show

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I think he's going to lie

You think he's going to lie? Anyone who doesn't know with 100% certainty at this point that he's going to lie has either been living under a rock for the better part of a decade now, or they're effectively braindead. Trump lying every time he opens his mouth is approaching death and taxes levels of certainty.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago
[-] Delta_ 11 points 1 month ago

It’s so obvious

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I'm amazed this jpg isn't more common.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 month ago

I don't disagree but her saying "I know he's going to lie" would be really dumb. Saying "I think he's going to lie" leaves open the possibility that he will overcome his lying nature (which would be a win for Harris anyways) while also reinforcing how predictable is.

It's a good statement as-is and anything stronger would have been unproductive.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I disagree, this smacks of the same limp wristed response that Democrats have been using for decades now. That's how we ended up in this situation in the first place. It's beyond time everyone stop pretending the emperor has clothes and actually acknowledge it. Trump lies. He always lies. I don't think he's ever given a single speech where he hasn't lied at least once. There's a reason his lawyers will move heaven and earth to prevent him from testifying in front of a jury in all his legal cases, and it's because doing so would be an absolutely guaranteed way to catch a perjury charge.

So yes, she should have just said "Trump will be repeating lies during the debate, so we're preparing to counter them. At this point everyone knows all his favorite lies, so we've got a pretty good idea of what we need to be prepared for."

That would have been an actually good statement that clearly sets expectations and shows an understanding of the situation. Soft peddling anything with Trump and the MAGA crowd just wastes time and makes you look indecisive.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 20 points 1 month ago

That's not as memorable as a short sarcastic jab that says exactly the same thing as what you said. The real point she was making is that they are preparing for Trump to be Trump. Simple as that.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The problem is a "sarcastic jab" is only one way of interpreting that statement. It also comes across as a mild but politically deniable statement of the sort that politicians have been criticized for making for nearly as long as politicians have existed. This is just the latest in a very long line of responses to Trump that stop short of actually saying what needs to be said. It's the equivalent of news companies peppering "alleged" and "accused" throughout their reports. Most of the time that's a good thing, but Trump has long since burned through whatever good will he was due. Stop treating him like a reasonable functional adult. If you give him and his followers (as well as the boot lickers over on fox) any wiggle room at all they'll take advantage of it.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago

You should read everything she said and not just the title. Context is everything, and she said plenty of other things that showed she wasn't playing nice but being sarcastic.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I did read all of it.

tends to fight for himself, not for the American people.

This was a great statement. More of this.

I expect that he's gonna, you know, I think he's gonna lie.

This is far too weak, and doesn't come across as sarcasm when printed. Maybe in person hearing her tone it would, but printed it's too ambiguous. I'm just absolutely fed up with people soft peddling around Trump. He's a habitual liar with at best a poor grasp of reality, who has run cons and scams for nearly as long as he's been alive. It was one thing when he was just a scummy business man, but with his turn to politics and dictatorship we can't afford half steps anymore.

[-] laranis@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Ready for the worst down voting of my life but I'm with you, orclev. Harris can and should do better. She needs to call him on his bullshit relentlessly, unapologetically, and with no regard to decorum. You know, like we should have done eight years ago. Don't play games. Call a spade a spade and save our fucking democracy already.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Are you mansplaining political reality to a presidential candidate? You should make shirts with that guy who told pope to go read the bible.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

No I'm criticizing a weak wishy-washy statement of the kind that has been made repeatedly for decades now and allowed Trump to happen in the first place. We need to stop treating Trump like an adult and start treating him like the petulant child he is. He deserves absolutely no respect. People need to stop being afraid to speak the truth about him.

There are only two kinds of people in Trump's orbit, morons, and grifters trying to exploit the morons, with Trump occupying the point in the Venn diagram exactly in between the two.

[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I preview my plan for all of next year: "I think the sun will rise at least once."

[-] Solitaire20X6@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago
[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

CNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNBC:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/09/09/harris-trump-debate-interview-preview.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago

Telling the truth isn't even how you win a debate. Seems like the MSM is setting the bar for Kamala Harris pretty low here.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
296 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3837 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS