371
submitted 2 months ago by Zagorath@aussie.zone to c/games@sh.itjust.works
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] themoken@startrek.website 114 points 2 months ago
[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago
[-] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

did you know that there's a button on each comment which is purpose built for you to express this exact sentiment? i've provided a helpful diagram:

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 68 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Engaging with other people on this small platform makes it feel less empty. There aren't many people here, so I go out of my way to talk to people instead of just interacting with the number beside their comment or post.

[-] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

"there's not much meat in this stew so i added sawdust" really isn't the slam dunk solution that you think it is.

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago

Your username is fitting.

Believe it or not, some people like making casual conversation with other people, even if it's just idle agreement.

Hope you have a nice day.

[-] match@pawb.social 56 points 2 months ago
[-] Vittelius@feddit.org 12 points 2 months ago

I can't find it

(Exploration: I'm using thunder, which is gesture based, you swipe to upvote rather than pressing a button)

[-] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

what app is that? looks sharp

[-] match@pawb.social 10 points 2 months ago

connect for lemmy!

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 months ago

You know if you don't think a comment adds to the discussion there's a purpose built button for you to express that exact sentiment? It's right below the one you pointed out in your very helpful diagram.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Catoblepas 25 points 2 months ago

It’s okay, the internet drought is over, we don’t have to ration posts anymore.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ok this got a chuckle out of me. But yeah, I don't see any problem with people expressing agreement verbally.

Imagine a real conversation where you're only allowed to agree with someone with nods, never saying "yeah I agree completely" or any other verbal feedback.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 19 points 2 months ago

Up and down votes are not a "agree / disagree" button. They are for dis/encouraging posts. You can upvote a post you disagree with but can see that it is useful for the discussion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Arbiter@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

omg, so true

hard agree

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 53 points 2 months ago

Man, I'm getting tired of everyone and their cat saying shit like "AI will...".

With how loosely defined "AI" is, it probably will at some point. But that statement is also completely worthless.

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

It's impressive how many Ls one man can take while still getting media coverage

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 33 points 2 months ago

When an AI is able to take and write every single line of code, generate all the art, and debug it just by having someone as code dumb as a CEO type in a prompt, I'll believe his words and eat my shirt.

[-] mutant_zz@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

The thing is even if AI could do all that (which is doubtful in my life time), you would still need someone to prompt it with something interesting. And CEO types have never had an interesting idea in their lives

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

And all they'll have to show for it is a mediocre pile of garbage

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

Man I thought he got better after he admitted that NFTs were a mistake, he can't help himself.

What a shame, I was ready to forgive the dude and play Masters of Albion, I loved black & white and there aren't any clones of it.

[-] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

He always apologizes before pushing his next scam.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago

There's a source port of Black and White that is in early development. Just had it's first alpha release.

So there might be a modern way to play it in a year or two. Hopefully modding too!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 months ago

you guys joke but AI npcs have the potential of being awesome

[-] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 25 points 2 months ago

A really good place would be background banter. Greatly reducing the amount of extra dialogues the devs will have to think of.

  1. Give the AI a proper scenario, with some Game lore based context, applicable to each background character.
  2. Make them talk to each other for around 5-10 rounds of conversation.
  3. Read them, just to make sure nothing seems out of place.
  4. Bundle them with TTS for each character sound type.

Sure, you'll have to make a TTS package for each voice, but at the same time, that can be licensed directly by the VA to the game studio, on a per-title basis and they too, can then get more $$$ for less work.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

they too, can then get more $$$ for less work.

I'm pretty sure it'll be less money for less work, at least after the first few titles. Companies really don't like paying more than they have to.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

They won't because of hallucinations. They could work in mature games though where its expected that whatever the AI says is not going to break your brain.

But yeah a kid walks up to toad in the next Mario game and toad tells Mario to go slap peaches ass, that game would get pulled really quick.

[-] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 11 points 2 months ago

I just re-read my comment and realised I was not clear enough.
You bundle the text and the AI-TTS. Not the AI text generator.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] c0ber@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

ai being used for good may unfortunately have to wait till the destruction of capitalism

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Bro still out here overhyping, he can't help himself.

[-] copygirl 12 points 2 months ago

There is a possibility something like this will be possible in the future, but it's not going to be an achievement of AI, it's largely going to be the achievement of regular developers creating a general-purpose game engine that can be used to put together a game block by block, which can be utilized by both human game designers and AI. (Likely to better effect by the former.) I can imagine Entity Component Systems will play a big part of that.

One of the biggest blockers for AI making games is going to be testing it to select for better performance. With text it's relatively easy to see if some text an AI produced is plausible. Images are also plentiful, but that's a lot more subjective. With both of these it would also not take a massive amount of time to add a human element. It's quick to check if a paragraph or image looks like it is a good response to the input promt. A game, however? How long do you need to play it to see if it's fun? At best, perhaps, you can write an AI to control a bot character to see if it's technically playable.

I don't want to even think about the electricity that wlll be wasted training such models.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago

Grifter gonna grift.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Who is still giving this man money?

[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 8 points 2 months ago

Capitalists don’t know shit about what the working class wants. These video game folks continue to prove this true.

[-] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

25 years might actually be a potentially realistic timeframe for that. But I'd still bet on a little longer myself. I hope it happens within my lifetime.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

This is one of the best titles in a long time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
371 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16689 readers
309 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS