364
submitted 3 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Bypass paywall: https://archive.ph/Kz2Sp

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 151 points 3 months ago

Lmao.

I'm sorry to laugh, but it's just the absurdity of it all.

The downward spiral of Boeing is insane.

[-] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

The irony of not being able to spiral downward, when spiraling downward.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 101 points 3 months ago

Why is NASA, a publicly funded science organization, fixing the mistakes of a for profit corporation?

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 107 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Because for goddamn reason we socialize the losses and privatize the profits

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 23 points 3 months ago

Those reasons being monopolies and greed and corruption and capitalism.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago

Read the article.

Boeing might opt to cancel Starliner and leave NASA with just a single provider of crew transportation. That would be painful for both NASA and Boeing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lemmeout@lemm.ee 63 points 3 months ago

But don't worry though, NASA says the astronauts are "not stranded".

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 months ago

Totally not stranded! The capsule that will bring them back just goes to another school.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

You wouldn’t know that capsule. It’s . . . It’s Canadian.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I am seriously upset. NASA press office seems to be telling lies left and right, and they think they're just pulling the old Washington spin cycle, but it's obvious lies. And they're easy out of line.

They issued a 248k "emergency" engineering study contract to SpaceX to support extra pax on the dragon. NASA press office claimed this award had absolutely nothing to do with Crew Test, but this was immediately contradicted by anonymous internal sources.

Heads need to roll at NASA PAO.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Totally not related. Just requested shortly after Starliner arrived at the station with issues. With an expeditious response. Totally normal procedures. Nothing to see here.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes, these headlines are continuing to say the astronauts are stranded, which really isn't the case. This vehicle is working well enough to return them at any time.

The thing is, there is something weird going on with some of the thrusters (of which there are many for redundancy) and this is their only chance to investigate the issue. If they were to return with the astronauts now, it would mean leaving the thrust module to burn up in the atmosphere, and then we wouldn't be able to test the problematic parts. We could still do that (leave now), but we'd miss out on this opportunity to test hardware and understand better why some thrusters failed.

On the other hand, this is still a huge waste of money and it's one more example of Boeing bungling things. So I'm not saying this is a great situation, just that the astronauts are not actually "stranded".

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sudo42@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Boeing doesn’t listen to their engineers, but we’re supposed to listen to their marketing department.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

They're not. Whether they return on Starliner is the question. SpaceX can send a Dragon up to bring them back easily.

[-] lemmeout@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

As far as the Starliner mission is considered, they are stranded. Dragon is the rescue mission.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] huquad@lemmy.ml 59 points 3 months ago

Two "not stranded" astronauts becoming increasingly stranded. More at 6

[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 58 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Holy shit. I got banned from reddit for saying the Boeing starliner astronauts should fear for their lives cuz Boeing. It was a joke, did not want it to become true! Hopefully they come home safe!

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wow that's actually crazy that they banned you for that lmao they couldn't make it any more obvious they got bought off by private companies, yikes. I'm glad Lemmy isn't prone to that, inherently by design.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

It was a joke, did not want it to become true!

Reddit is, in fact, a joke.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

A total ban like mine?

I got banned for going to sniffies and bringing people from there to r/Seattlegay, which I started during the pandemic.

They banned me site wise on all my accounts and all my devices.

[-] tiefling 9 points 3 months ago

They banned me site wise for saying that riot police should quit their jobs following RvW. But all the right wing trolls spewing vitriol were perfectly acceptable.

[-] 2lama@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I made a bunch of comments critical of the site and then banned myself (deleted account) before they could ban me. "You can't fire me, I quit!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago

When it had issues immediately post-launch, there were a LOT of Boeing-defenders: “oh no, keeping it there is a precaution, there’s nothing seriously wrong with it. They’re definitely not stuck on the station…”

Yeah. When this fucking death trap was launched WHILE HAVING ISSUES, I knew it wasn’t going to be a quick round trip. Frankly, I’d be amazed if those astronauts up there would be willing to take the return trip on it. NASA has a poor track record in that regard.

I absolutely love spaceflight and whole heartedly support programs. But Boeing needs to not be making spacecraft that humans fly on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

Y’know one of those “options” was not to send it after the leaks were discovered.

Then they were all like, “Pffft. It’s fiiine. Just go.”

Then they were up there all, “Okay, so, slight delay”

Then, “Okay well that’s borked, but don’t worry, it’s all being handled.”

Now it’s “Options, anyone? Yes, all of them.”

[-] dugmeup@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago

A top option should also be removing the current Boeing board and C suite. What a debacle.

[-] kinttach@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago

Your wish is granted.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/31/investing/boeings-losses-new-ceo/index.html

As announced earlier key board members are also resigning.

Have they rotated the deck chairs on the Titanic, or is this a meaningful change?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Skunk@jlai.lu 44 points 3 months ago

Wait what, they are still up there ?

Wasn't it supposed to be postponed for just a few days so they can analyze the leaks and 'please move along nothing to see here'.

[-] nulluser@programming.dev 16 points 3 months ago

I had the same reaction a couple days ago when I saw they were still there. Definitely not a good look for Boeing.

[-] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 28 points 3 months ago

They are considering sending a 737 max

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

It will certainly descend fast enough to get them home for dinner

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

I'm just glad they have a ready-to-deploy backup plan. SpaceX is nailing it. I just hope that the future will remember the terrific work that Gwynne Shotwell and many others did while "someone else" where busy tossing money away.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago
[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well, this was actually fkning concerning. Ofk is not like other Company aren't playing to launch thousand of satellites too. There should be a serious regulation and some heavy changes in the metal alloy used at very least. I'm sure that Trump already has a plan about it...

... ofk i'm fking kidding. Vote [everyone else] x president .

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

So we're starting to look at aluminum debris in the upper atmosphere, when are we going to look at carbon fibre debris? Or rocket fuel in the upper atmosphere? We dont know what any of that shit does. Im going to hazard a guess that it does nothing good.

If you were to light ten thousand Starlink satellites on fire in a bonfire on the ground people would put you in jail. When it happens in the upper atmosphere its called progress.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

It seems to me like we should be at the point where there should just always be a backup plan so the people taking the real risks don't have to sit around waiting for 8+ weeks as some people try to do best by them while others just try to cover their assess and pretend everything is ok because they are fucked if things aren't ok and might be inclined to risk lives in the hopes they get the good outcome.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Wired Magazine - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Wired Magazine:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.wired.com/story/nasa-boeing-starliner-return-home-spacex/
~Media~ ~Bias~ ~Fact~ ~Check~ ~|~ ~bot~ ~support~

[-] CyberMonkey404@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

boeing should have all contracts cancelled and be broken up. every gov't. official that OK'd the starliner and this mission should be fired and investigated.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

NASA spokesperson Josh Finch told Ars on Thursday evening, “NASA is evaluating all options for the return of agency astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams from the International Space Station as safely as possible. No decisions have been made, and the agency will continue to provide updates on its planning.”

A standard statement like this doesn't really warrant a news article.

[-] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

That is a notable change from "we're just double checking things on the Starliner, which we think we can fix. We expect them to ride it home soon" that has been the message for a long time. Now it's "we're looking at all options".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Well, time for the emergency knotted rope I guess.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
364 points (100.0% liked)

News

23266 readers
2679 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS