2091
Just a reminder (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 159 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I love how the propagandists just keep beating the same drum after the Biden administration has constructed a ceasefire deal which has received unanimous UN Security Council support, and did appear to be moving forward until about 14 hours ago. (Edit: It might still, that's not over yet.)

It's almost like if the US just turns its back on Israel, we'd lose our leverage to press a negotiated agreement, which would surely not end with Israel digging in their heels even further. (/s) It's almost like geopolitics are - wait for it - complicated.

Second Edit: Let's also not forget that Israel is a nuclear power. What do you think happens when Israel's back is against the wall, they're running out of conventional weapons, and Iran and/or other groups decide to take advantage?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 81 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It was unanimous because Russia abstained. Putin loves the refocus on Israel while he continues his genocidal war crimes in Ukraine under the US media radar.

For those who haven’t been keeping up, Russia has abducted 700,000 Ukrainian children to be raised as Russians in foster homes since the war began. It’s genocide on a scale 20 times larger than Palestine, and isn’t making national headlines in the US due to the focus on Israel.

The US formally declared this as genocide in the House of Representatives with a 390-9 vote in April by invoking the UN Genocide Convention, and the ICC has issued arrest warrants. Did you see any headlines about that?

Russia is also the largest investor in the sanctioned Iran economy that is directly funding Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.

[-] Kellamity@sh.itjust.works 31 points 5 months ago

I was sceptical of this claim so I did some research - 700,000 is almost certainly too high, but other than that it's disturbingly true:

The 700,000 number comes from a Russian parliamentarian in 2023, and refers to orphaned and abandoned children Russia has 'protected' from conflict zones in Ukraine. A later Russian report walked this back a bit, and claimed that most of this number were children accompanied by family voluntarily escaping the fighting by feeling into Russia.

Obviously we should be sceptical of what Russia says about this, but this is not the same number as the number of children abducted - not even Ukraine alleges it to be this high.

The number of children abducted and forcibly deported was officially reported by Kyev to be 19,000 to 20,000 at the time of the above claim based on the data (nearly 30,000 now). The real number is almost certainly higher - many Ukranian officials believe the actual amount is higher, with one saying it may be into the 'hundreds of thousands'. A US report in 2022 estimates that Russia has "interrogated, detained, and forcibly deported... 260,000 children, from their homes to Russia"

Even if we take only the low amount that can be fairly positively stated as abductions, that's nearly 30,000 children. Various reports have shown some of these children being given new Russian identities and false birth certificates, and being put up for adoption in Russia. Some have testified to being indoctrinated and shown pro-Kremlin propaganda.

This broadly constitutes Cultural Genocide - whether it technically is or not is for academics to argue over, because the legal definition of genocide is complicated and so much is unkown.

Whether or not you want to call it a Genocide, it is undeniably a War Crime. The ICC has issued arrest warrents for Putin and Russian Children's Rights Commissioner Maria Lvova-Belova over this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jumjummy@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

And yet not a peep from these “Genocide Joe” people. They’re either Russian disinformation agents, or useful idiots.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (41 replies)
[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

But hey, some rando with literally no national attention is polling at 3% in a couple of safely blue states, so definitely don’t vote for GeNoCiDe JoE! /s

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 43 points 5 months ago
[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Oh I’ve noticed. The way I see it, there are three options when it comes to the “both sides”/protest vote camp, every single one of them is one of the following:

  • a bad faith actor cosplaying as a leftist
  • an accelerationist
  • a misguided idealist who legitimately believes a non-mainstream candidate could win and/or completely disregards the cold hard fact that FPTP means a third party/abstain vote simply endangers the lesser of two evils candidate while empowering the greater of two evils candidate

No matter what I will never stop throwing shade at that crowd hard and heavy. The first two on that list will never change. I do hope, however, that continued social pressure on that last type of person will make some of them realize that voting is just as much a responsibility as a right, and consider that maybe there’s a good reason their views are so unpopular.

Edited after a good point made by samus12345.

Also I noticed the single downvote on every one of my comments. I know who you are lol. Glad to see I’m still living in your head rent-free.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm absolutely voting for Biden and everyone should, because he is the best viable candidate on literally every issue, including Palestine.

That said, he has openly and loudly taken Israel's side for months. As a result, he's made himself an avatar for all the other US institutions that are openly against any criticism of Israel or support for Palestinians. Even if he has secretly been doing everything he can to stop the killing all this time—which I doubt—he had still fucked up massively when it come to avoiding the blowback from other groups' attempts to crush anyone who speaks out, including agencies his administration controls.

load more comments (29 replies)
[-] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 82 points 5 months ago

Both sides do suck. but only one is trying to get an orange dictator elected. I'm still voting Biden. Democrats aren't perfect but it's the only choice we have.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

You elect Biden to live another day to fight him, you vote for trump and you shoot yourself in whatever genitals you have before we go full dictator for life, immunity for all crimes (and none of those things for you)

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

This. I f*cking HATE having to vote for Biden. I've hated voting for Democrats for the last 20 years. But I'll vote for him this year because right now, our choices are between boring corporatists and 100% concentrated evil. I may hate my government but I love my country and I don't want it to end.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 74 points 5 months ago

The only person who can so militantly cling to the idea that both sides are exactly the same is the person for whom the outcomes are exactly the same.

IE the person who needs to do a lot more shutting the fuck up and listening to the people for whom this shit is life and death.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 68 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

100% true. "Both sides" arguments exist SOLELY to deflect from awful things done by Republicans, or detract from positive things done by Democrats.

Not once have I seen it deployed for any other purpose.

Edit for the pedants: I should probably have not led with "100% true" before the sentence where I clearly stated my position. Although I think the delta between what I wrote after that and what is in OP is a difference without a distinction, if some of you want to feel like you really got me, you go right ahead.

[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

You're 100% assuming motives. "Deployed", lol.

This is like saying that because we know smoking causes lung cancer, that the ONLY reason anyone smokes is because they're trying to get lung cancer.

Review Hanlon's Razor, and stop thinking there's sinister conspiracies everywhere, it's bad for your mental health.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 65 points 5 months ago

I do think there is a constructive way to talk about how both sides accommodate the interests of the ruling class. We are at the point where our choices are corporate shills and fascist corporate shills. I am going to vote for the non-fascists every time, but don't tell me I am harming the conversation when I expect the corporate shills to be better too.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 60 points 5 months ago

both sides aren't bad.

one side is bad. the other side is a comically evil, fucking nightmare that is going to make sure all future generations for the foreseeable future will suffer things that can be avoided by voting for the "bad" side.

don't be stupid. one side is banning abortion, is going to go after simple contraceptives next, and will certainly ban gay marriage as soon as possible. their obsession with trans people is just a foot in the door.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee 57 points 5 months ago

Sure, both sides are not the same. But the "good" side is still part of the system that allows the "bad" side to exist.

So by all means, vote for the party that will do less damage in the short term. But oppose FPTP voting at the same time.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 54 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Absolutely correct. And when you see them here on lemmy, and there are a TON of them suggesting not to vote-

CALL THEM OUT.

I would LOVE to see a movement form to start pushing these bad actors out of here.

[-] kevindqc@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

They don't care and double down. I tag them as "Pro US Fascism" and move on.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And to say bOtHsIdEsSaMe you have to simplify to the point of stupidity to try to equate them. There's no detail or nuance. The world is a million shades of grey but they can only see black or white.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Of course, because when you lay it all out, there’s an obvious difference.

Biden rejoined the Paris Climate Agreement, revoked the Keystone Pipeline permit, created a 13 million acre federal petroleum reserve for Alaskan wildlife, greatly increased oil site lease cost, signed $7B in solar subsidies, enacted the Inflation Reduction act to support clean energy, leveraged the NLRB for an FTC ruling that eliminated non-compete agreements, forgave billions in student debt from predatory loans, created the CHIPS Act to improve reliance on domestic technology, reinstated Net Neutrality, repealed Title 42, ended the Muslim Ban, reinstated the law prohibiting Israeli settlement on Palestinian territory, signed the Equality Act for LGBTQ+ rights, restored gay rights to beneficiaries, reenacted trans care anti-discrimination law, signed the Respect for Marriage Act, enabled unspecified gender on US Passports, rejoined WHO, rescheduled marijuana, reducing drug costs with the American Rescue Plan Act…

Trump repealed 112 climate regulations, left the Paris Climate Agreement, disbanded the pandemic response team stalling national pandemic response, left the WHO, repealed trans care anti-discrimination law, repealed gay rights to beneficiaries, enacted Title 42 and the Muslim ban, repealed laws on Israeli settlements on Palestinian territory, repealed Net Neutrality, provided tax cuts to the wealthy that further widened our already exploitative wealth inequality, increased tariffs on goods costing the consumers, repealed the ACA without replacement, seated the conservatives in SCOTUS that repealed Roe v. Wade…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mydude@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago

Both sides are bad, votes third party.

[-] absentbird@lemm.ee 23 points 5 months ago

When it comes to keeping republicans from taking power and enacting Christian nationalism, how is that different than not voting?

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago

Don't forget, Trump said if minorities vote, Republicans will never win another election. Republicans are doing what they can to stay in power and make it harder for people to vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] audiomodder 35 points 5 months ago

Boy this rhetoric sounds familiar. “Democracy is under attack by Republicans”. Oh right, it’s the exact same goddamn thing Democrats have been saying for the last 15 years. And yet even though they’ve been in power a significant part of that time, somehow we keep inching towards fascism.

At some point you realize that the only real question is do we want fascism next week, or do we want fascism next month? And while I agree that voting for Drumpf is a much worse choice for the country, maybe if Democrats actually did stuff to make every day citizens lives better then maybe it really wouldn’t be much of an argument.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

even though they’ve been in power a significant part of that time

Since 1981 Democrats have had control of the Presidency and Congress a whopping 4 years. One 2 year period under Clinton and one under Obama. That's without factoring in the ability to fillibuster in the Senate. In over 40 years they've only had control 10% of the time.

maybe if Democrats actually did stuff to *make every day citizens lives better

That period of filibuster-proof control during Obama's term is why we have the ACA. It was ~70 days and they passed the largest healthcare overhaul in generations.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

maybe if Democrats actually did stuff to make every day citizens lives better

$150 billion student loan forgiveness, first big action in climate change ever in US history, CHIPS act, infrastructure act, huge increase in corporate taxes to fund all that stuff, activists in charge of NLRB which gave fuel to all these union gains we've seen in recent years, recovery from covid like it never happened which basically no other first world country was able to do, gain in wages for low-income workers even adjusted for fairly massive inflation, medical debt off credit reports, net neutrality, plus also obviously not the end of democracy in the US is a nice bonus

(Not to say it isn't a problem the Democrats' general level of money-in-politics corruption, or their willingness to continue dogshit US policies like support for Israel. Both of those are massive problems. But saying that they don't do anything to make everyday citizens' lives better is, at least for the last few years, absolutely objectively false.)

The main problem isn't anything about what the Democrats actually do. It's that the priorities of the people who own the news, and the bots that run social media influence campaigns, are not at all aligned with those every day citizens, and so nobody even knows that any of that big list even happened.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"both sides" arguments exist to remind us that neither is our friend. Yes, there are clear differences between the two, but I'm not going to sit here and pretend that one is the "good guys" and ones some unfathomable evil entity.

Neither side is my friend, and I aim to remember that. It doesn't mean I'm going to not vote. It doesn't mean I'm going to encourage others to not vote. It's simply an expression of "I am voting now under duress. None of these options appeals to me, but I must participate in the system lest I be consumed by it."

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

But both sides ARE bad. Still, go vote.

It's ok to be critical of our politicians regardless of which "team" they're on. We should all be holding their feet to the fire every day.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago

Vote.

And vote down-ticket. Your local elections are far more important than the presidency.

[-] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 30 points 5 months ago

Bro vote democrat this time. I'm sure next elections the republican candidate will be better when they inevitably win. I'm sure the democrat candidate will be better too, bro, I swear, just vote. The spiral towards right wing because of the recurring "lesser evil vote" will get better bro I swear.

[-] ahal@lemmy.ca 27 points 5 months ago

In politics all parties are bad, each in their own unique way. It's just that they can be bad to vastly differing degrees.

Unfortunately lots of people struggle with continuums and see only black and white.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 25 points 5 months ago

Ah, I see, we've come from "vote for the lesser evil" to "anyone claiming that the democrats are bad is on Putin's/the Repuplican's payroll".

Or how else should we interpret that "specifically designed" part?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 25 points 5 months ago

No. They have plenty of voters. I'm so tired of this liberal bashing of people with fucking empathy and a tired deposition towards the apathetic unhelpful political parties in charge, as your way to get more votes.

I get that we have a binary decision with our presidency election but no, this is not an effective method other than to piss off people you are essentially stating straight up you think of as lesser.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
2091 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5498 readers
1783 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS