214

Trial results for new lung cancer drug are ‘off the charts’, say doctors (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 5 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Doctors are hailing “off the chart” trial results that show a new drug stopped lung cancer advancing for longer than any other treatment in medical history.

Lung cancer is the world’s leading cause of cancer death, accounting for about 1.8m deaths every year. Survival rates in those with advanced forms of the disease, where tumours have spread, are particularly poor.

More than half of patients (60%) diagnosed with advanced forms of lung cancer who took lorlatinib were still alive five years later with no progression in their disease, data presented at the world’s largest cancer conference showed. The rate was 8% in patients treated with a standard drug, the trial found.

The results are the longest progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes ever recorded in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, the world’s most common form of the disease. They were presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (Asco) in Chicago on Friday.

top 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] quinacridone@lemmy.ml 54 points 5 months ago

I don't normally comment on news posts, but in this instance, FUCK CANCER

Fuck cancer for stealing my brother from me, and for taking half my bf's lung

I seriously hopes this works for everyone out there living with this disease, and for their families, friends, the people who love them....

.....and also for everyone who has died too soon and missed their chance for survival. Their donation of tissue samples and furthering the cancer research that ultimately wouldn't help them, but will help the poor bastards that are diagnosed today and in the future...It is bitter sweet

Fuck cancer

[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago

Fuck cancer all the way. Every step further in stopping it is a win. And this seems like it might be a particularly great step.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

Fuck yes.

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 17 points 5 months ago

It's the second major medical breathrough this week. If they both turned out true, that would be incredible.

[-] febra@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

What was the other one?

[-] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 5 months ago

I think it was a promising treatment for type 2 diabetes.

[-] Uriel_Copy@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Effectively a cure for Diabetes I believe

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

So... smoke 'em if you got 'em.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 21 points 5 months ago

Smoking can also cause cancer in the larynx, mouth, pharynx, esophagus, pancreas, bladder, stomach, colon, rectum, liver, cervix, kidney, and blood. It's by no means a free pass.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

I know, I was kidding. It's an old phrase from WWII.

https://armyhistory.org/reflections-smoke-em-if-you-got-em/

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Yes, I'm familiar with its origin.

[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 months ago

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Well that's a hilarious tinfoil hat theory- that lung-cancer-fighting drugs are financed by Big Tobacco as a way for them to sell more cigarettes.

And honestly, is there anything more late-stage capitalism than "who cares if this activity causes you cancer; you can just take a pill to make it go away!"

-The above post was brought to you by Lucky Strikes, the cigarette that causes the most treatable form of cancer!

[-] lady_maria@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

That's awesome to hear, but I'm sure it'll be unaffordable for many—if not most—people who need it... at least in the US. :(

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

It's great news for Europe, though! I'm glad for them.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 9 points 5 months ago

doctors further said that once the results where back on the charts it showed a beneficial effect.

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 1 points 5 months ago

I assumed their charts were showing real numbers and their numbers were imaginary.

[-] Stardust@kbin.social 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Lung cancer killed my pet and I imagine it killed many other people's pets too. Cancer also killed some of my other pets.

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 6 points 5 months ago

Pfizer to the moon!

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Doctors are hailing “off the chart” trial results that show a new drug stopped lung cancer advancing for longer than any other treatment in medical history.

The results are the longest progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes ever recorded in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, the world’s most common form of the disease.

“To our knowledge these results are unprecedented,” said the study’s lead author, Dr Benjamin Solomon, a medical oncologist at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne, Australia.

“You don’t need a magnifying glass to see the difference between these two drugs,” said Dr Julie Gralow, Asco’s chief medical officer.

Dr David Spigel, the chief scientific officer of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute in London, a world-leading clinical trials facility specialising in new therapies for cancer patients, welcomed the findings.

“Showcasing the power of cancer-growth blocker drugs, this study could present us with an effective way of stopping cancer in its tracks and preventing it from spreading to the brain.

The original article contains 639 words, the summary contains 161 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

As in good, right?

RIGHT?

this post was submitted on 31 May 2024

214 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39004 readers

2335 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.