204
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 81 points 7 months ago

Republican

In case there was any question.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago

But was he a drag queen? I keep hearing how dangerous they are.

[-] puppy@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

I was 99% positive. But thanks for confirming.

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Shocker. /s

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 71 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Dang, so they just swept all of this shit under the rug in return for him being dismissed from the police "quietly?" Dude threatened to rape, and kill the chief of police wife, and kids, before killing the chief himself. Abused his authority to engage in an inappropriate relationship with a 15 year old girl, all while his fellow officers actively feared for their lives due to his anger.

Their response? "Well we don't want him going psycho and killing us, so in exchange for him quietly exiting the police force, we're just not gonna hold him accountable for literally anything. Feel free to go off into the night, you violent, angry, pedophilic monster! Good luck everybody else!"

Then they elected him state rep! TWICE!

And not one single cop came forward to talk about this shit while he was seeking election.

Only a Sith deals in absolutes, but dang man. ACAB.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago

This is the exact reason ACAB. The others didn't directly participate in the actions but silence is complacence and when you're in the position of a police officer, who's job it is to uphold the law, there's extra significance to remaining silent. If they were civilians, they'd be called, "accomplices".

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 7 months ago

Obstruction of Justice at the very least. They shouldn’t really start prosecuting police forces like this for Rico though. They’re all in on it.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 32 points 7 months ago

Republican Rep. Jon Stone’s New Hampshire law enforcement career ended when he threatened to kill fellow police officers in a shooting spree, and murder his chief after raping the chief’s wife and children, all while he was already under scrutiny for his inappropriate relationship with a teen girl, according to the internal investigation reports finally released this week.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 7 months ago

Stone had a reputation for being aggressive on the job and had already been disciplined for assaulting a mentally disabled man during an arrest, and for failing to arrest an intoxicated driver who a short time later nearly hit a police cruiser in Vermont.

Totally normal.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 13 points 7 months ago

For a Republican.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago
[-] frunch@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

For real! This guy is a real piece of shit, i imagine Trump's other VP candidates are getting nervous

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

The (R)aping Kids party, for people who shout pedo and groomer they sure have a lot of pedos and groomers.

Every accusation is a confession

[-] Gorram_Reavers@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

He perfectly represents the people that voted for him.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 8 points 7 months ago

Prediction: other Republicans won't bat an eye.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is the most New Hampshire shit I've ever heard.

The icing on the cake is that after alleged statutory rape and threatening violent rape, murder, and a mass shooting, he is now a republican politician and gunstore owner: Black Op Arms in Claremont, NH.

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
204 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2352 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS