957
submitted 6 months ago by makeasnek@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tyler@programming.dev 150 points 6 months ago

Man people really set up the strawmen here. Congress has literally said it’s about foreign influence, not about protecting children. It has absolutely nothing to do with kids. It has to do with China influencing the citizens of the United States to do things that are beneficial to China, against the interests of the US government.

It’s not a ban, if China gives up control of the app to a United States entity then there’s no problem. It has absolutely nothing to do with protecting children.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

Congress has literally said it’s about foreign influence

Which is also a lie. The likes of Twitter, Facebook and Google are just as beholden to foreign governments such as the fascist regimes of India, Israel, Myanmar and others. They pay the people in Congress a lot more in legal bribes, though, so they can basically get away with anything.

It’s not a ban, if China gives up control of the app to a United States entity then there’s no problem.

Imagine the uproar if China demanded that Google stopped being a US military contractor..

What the whole thing is about is empty symbolic rhetoric and xenophobia in an election year and oppressive measures to go with it.

[-] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Google was blocked in China in 2014 for refusing to censor search results. Now search results are censored and must go through their Hong Kong subsiduary. The last part is what the US Government is asking for TikTok to do right?

China already bans and censors loads of apps and websites already so I don't think looking at what they do in this instance is a good idea.

[-] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

China did that. We criticized them for it. Now we're turning around and doing it. "We should get to do it because insert dictator here does it" isn't a great argument.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] borari@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 months ago

Imagine the uproar if China demanded that Google stopped being a US military contractor.

China is actively demanding that all Chinese companies excise American hardware and software from their technology stacks. They know that they can’t divorce a US tech company headquartered in the US from the US intelligence agencies, so it is the next best option. This is colloquially known in China as “Delete A” or “Delete America”. Who is being xenophobic again?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Ok, China is a bad example, except as what not to do.

As you pointed out yourself, this bill is Congress acting like the oppressive Chinese government rather than the liberal democracy the US likes to pretend to be.

[-] borari@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Preventing an oppressive government from exerting undue influence on another sovereign nation’s citizenry is an oppressive act itself?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] turkishdelight@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 months ago

Americans are so racist that they can't accept the fact that non-American companies can be successful.

[-] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

Short answer: No

Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooo

[-] declination@programming.dev 20 points 6 months ago

Its worth adding, TikTok in China (it's called something else, I'm blanking) is entirely controlled on the state and there is absolutely no way that it would be permitted to host any political discussion or advocate mass action not approved by the state. Their "Hey call your congressman" stunt was the most idiotic PR move ever, because they demonstrated that this company is willing and able to leverage the userbase in the US in ways that would never be permitted in "West Taiwan".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Who are they worried China is going to influence? Children, right? If it's adults, that's almost more insulting, they think we don't deserve to be able to see all sides of an argument and are too stupid to discern fact from fiction. We may as well dispense with free expression entirely at that point because the government can just say "you're too stupid to read this and we're worried you'll be influenced, so you can only read the books we've pre-approved for you"

It is every American's right to think freely, to speak those thoughts to others, and to have others have the opportunity to hear those thoughts whether or not they are "good influences" according to govt. It is wild how easily people are willing to throw that right away for fears of "foreign influence". What's next, banning TV shows from foreign countries because they might "corrupt our culture"? Banning books with subversive topics because they will "give people bad ideas"?. This is how the road to fascism begins.

[-] borari@sh.itjust.works 37 points 6 months ago

Who are they worried China is going to influence? Children, right? If it's adults, that's almost more insulting, they think we don't deserve to be able to see all sides of an argument and are too stupid to discern fact from fiction.

Yeah fam, you and me are definitely way too smart to ever be manipulated by military units whose sole job is to effectively manipulate large swaths of the population.

The answer is everyone. They’re worried about anyone and everyone, because they do it also.

https://youtu.be/VA4e0NqyYMw?si=u_d-eDOMYA-FetVn

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Reucnalts@feddit.de 10 points 6 months ago

You are asking if banning books is the next thing. Isnt it already happening in the schools in some parts of USA?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Obonga@feddit.de 60 points 6 months ago

"What about the people on epsteins list" is gotta be the most generic strawman.

[-] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Cna you believe that they haven't arrested every single person who ever made social contact with epstein and arrested them for rape, despite a lack of any supporting evidence that they committed a crime?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de 55 points 6 months ago

Let's ban TikTok while our kids are dying because of guns. It's like they're doing everything they can to lose an election.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmc2201761

[-] eatham@aussie.zone 48 points 6 months ago

Holy shit America is crazy. How do you get to the point where more kids are dying of guns than cars in a country with too many cars. And why has poisoning gone up so much?

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 months ago

It's poisoning and drug overdose. I can only assume fentanyl is the reason for a huge spike in that area.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 months ago

And giant cats it seems.

Also wtf is going on with drugs since 2019. Is this all fentanyl?

[-] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Spike@feddit.de 41 points 6 months ago

What in the tankie fuck am i reading

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

They aren't wrong though. Every time they want to screw with us they trot out the children. From gun control to banning transgender care.

[-] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] antidote101@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago

Because it's not a list of rapists, just a list of people Epstein was interested in having influential control over.

...and even going to the Island just meant he was trying to influence you. He was looking for whatever leverage he could find over people.

[-] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Agreed. Its a list. Anyone can make a list of people. They can even put people they've never met on the list.

I can make a list, put your name on it, label "bad people" and leave it for the FBI to find. Does that prove you're bad?

For those who have truley committed the crimes suggested by the "list", I vote for a beheading (not the one attached to the neck).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] solarvector@lemmy.ml 29 points 6 months ago

How is this itself not a fake argument?

The arguments in support of tick-tock are a bizarre amalgamation of just about every category of bad faith argument. I haven't seen one that suggests tick-tock it's actually a net benefit.

[-] redempt@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

it's not that tiktok is good, it's that banning it sets a bad precedent and will be used to justify further control and censorship of the internet

[-] zovits@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

I'm all for setting a precedent if it's about banning chinese spyware and propaganda weapons.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SexWithDogs@infosec.pub 10 points 6 months ago

Whataboutism is a form of informal fallacy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BluJay320 26 points 5 months ago

Fuck TikTok, but I’m sick of hearing “BUT THE KIDS!!!” As an excuse for constantly trampling everyone’s freedoms

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Agrivar@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

I may have missed something in civics class, but since when is access to a crappy social media site a right?

[-] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Since when is reading newspapers your government doesn't agree with a right? Since when is communicating with people your government doesn't like a right? Since when is publishing whatever you want a right? Since approximately 1776. It's such an important right that it's literally the first one in the constitution. Because our ability to speak freely and criticize the government is one of the rights that underpins all others. The medium shouldn't matter, speech is speech whether it's an app, website, chat server, newspaper, bulletin board, code, painting, drawing, whatever. If the government can just shut down any medium or venue they don't like because "it's propaganda", that basically closes the door to any open criticism of the government.

We've tried not having those rights for the sake of convenience, expediency, or social pleasantness. Tends to not end well. Ask people in Russia or Iran how that "government gets to dictate where and how you speak" thing is going for them. Insane bootlicking going on in this thread.

[-] borari@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mean I’m not saying that this is being gone about the right way or for the right reasons, but when an adversarial nation-state is working to undermine US economic interests within its borders is there really anything wrong with punching back? I personally don’t think so, but I’m fully aware that I’m probably in the minority on this here.

https://twitter.com/lizalinwsj/status/1765615508357779477

(paywalled article from author above https://www.wsj.com/world/china/china-technology-software-delete-america-2b8ea89f)

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

If the "protect children" politician does nothing about school shootings, you know they're a PoS.

[-] thorbot@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

This is fucking retarded

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 months ago

The "for the children" arguments are almost always misleading.

Don't get me wrong, there's stuff that's genuinely "for the children", but the vast majority of the time they're doing something for the children it's not.

Bluntly, the core of the argument for a lot of the online stuff for the children is reported as protecting them against would be child molestation or dangers of some similar variety. In tiktok's case, here's a platform that has huge potential for revenue due to its popularity, and has an established user base. I'm certain that many of the so-called upper class/elites/capitalist pigs/owners of the country, are salivating at the prospect of getting a piece of that. It was said, in the open discussion for the bill to ban tiktok, that they want to "make" tiktok "better". Not better for the people using it, better for the people who could profit from it. Several of these shit heads have already, formally and publicly stated that they have an interest in acquiring the platform, because the bill says: tiktok will be banned unless it sells to an American owner. So the only way for tiktok to operate in America after the bill is passed, is for them to buy it.

The legislation isn't for the children. The legislation is the people who actually hold power, making the government do a thing so they can reap the rewards.

They want to profit off of the children. Because mind raping them at a young age into a life of consumerism and spending, while earning money for that privilege, is a capitalists wet dream.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 6 months ago

But Black Dynamite, we're on Epstein's list.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
957 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45148 readers
1898 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS