1555
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 804 points 1 month ago

I don't understand you people in this thread.

Ever since the debate, people have been calling for Joe Biden to step down from the presidential race and give the place to someone else.

Now I read the comments and everyone is criticizing and accusing the Democrats of not knowing what they're doing? Are you for real? They're doing EXACTLY what people have been asking for. They're doing EXACTLY what needs to be done if they want to win.

Fucking hell you guys, make up your fucking mind.

Sincerely,

A Canadian with severe anxiety over your next presidential election.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 283 points 1 month ago

Well, to be fair, he should have stepped down a year ago, or at least 3 months ago. I vaguely remember him saying he was going to be a 1 term candidate in 2020.

Anyway, I respect Biden. I honestly think he was a better president than Obama, Bush, Trump and Clinton. Perhaps the best since Carter or JFK.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 142 points 1 month ago

I vaguely remember him saying he was going to be a 1 term candidate in 2020.

You're correct, he did. Everyone forgot that for some reason. Note that this article is from 2019:

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/11/biden-single-term-082129

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 94 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Another top Biden adviser put it this way: “He’s going into this thinking, ‘I want to find a running mate I can turn things over to after four years but if that’s not possible or doesn’t happen then I’ll run for reelection.’ But he’s not going to publicly make a one term pledge.”

That source does not say what you're claiming it says.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Which is ironic, because he picked Harris then used her as the bearer of bad news at every single opportunity.

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

So add those together and it implies he doesn't think Harris has the chops. But, to be fair, if that was actually the plan, they would've given her much more PR over the last 4 years.

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

If it weren't Trump running I think he would have stepped aside. He believed in 2019, and probably still believes now, that he has the best chance against Trump and that Trump is a singularly existential threat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 43 points 1 month ago

He very specifically did not say publicly that he would be a 1 term president. Talking through the idea with aides and someone leaking it does not equal a campaign promise.

This is a new decision, obviously. He is going to be a 1 term president. But he never promised it.

[-] bolexforsoup 11 points 1 month ago

Your own source contradicts this claim…doesn’t look like we forgot about anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

I vaguely remember him saying he was going to be a 1 term candidate in 2020.

He specifically denied that when asked. To be fair he did say he was a "bridge to a new generation" or something, that's where I think a lot of people are getting this one term commitment thing from.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/joe-biden-denies-mulling-term-pledge-elected-president/story?id=67662497

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 137 points 1 month ago

Those are not necessarily the same people.

But there is no good option here. The good option would have been to run a good candidate over a year ago. That time has obviously long since passed.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 month ago

The US "election cycle" is insane. You don't need to be running a candidate over a year before the election. 3 months is more than enough time to tell people who your candidate is and what they are running on, and you have more than 3 months.

Yes, it would have been better to announce earlier, but jesus christ he is too fucking old for this shit. Stepping back now is still better than pushing through.

[-] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

The longer the cycle is made, the more people can be distracted from the actual politics and the more it matters who gets the most money.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

You can't just launder $2B of campaign contributions overnight. You need a year or two to filter it credibly through pundits, consultants, pollsters, and advertisers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

Especially with how calcified the voting population is. Each candidate has something like a 44% floor of people who already know they're going to vote for "the Democratic candidate" and the only question is how many of them actually go to the polls and what the remaining randos decide. And only in a handful of swing states. Most of the system is already predetermined.

[-] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Bro, we start selling a Christmas decorations in July in the US. People need to be making money off this shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 month ago

The good option would have been to run a good candidate over a year ago.

"Eight years ago" is indeed "over a year ago."

dead horse pummeling sounds

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago

Many of the people involved in such agitation are not arguing in good faith. They simply want to attack the 'libs' at every opportunity, and reality be damned.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This was an astroturfing campaign covering our media and also via bots on social media.

I watched the debate and while he was slower, and mixed up words he actually was aware of US goals and challenges (despite what media tried to imply), trump was more energetic but he was constantly spewing nonsense, and while part of it was lying as usual, part of it was clear that he was actually getting lost.

I even wrote that in certain that if Biden steps down the same bots will start campaign how Democrats were cheated to discourage them from voting (like it was worth Bernie).

I'm definitively voting for Kamala now no matter what ridiculous bullshit they will come up on her on September-October (you can be sure there will be some scandal that will turnout to be nothing burger after election). I got fooled (like a lot of people) in 2016 to vote 3rd party and we got trump.

Republicans are actually a minority they can only win if they discourage enough people from voting. That's why they are against laws that that make voting easier.

I actually was hoping Biden would run as he has great experience with foreign leaders as well as very successful reaching compromises and passing bills that otherwise wouldn't fly.

As I say though I will 100% vote for Kamala (or whomever will be the democratic candidate), definitively not the fascist party and in fact anyone on Democrats side looks good.

[-] noisefree@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

I got fooled (like a lot of people) in 2016 to vote 3rd party and we got trump.

So rare to see someone actually say these words outside of pointing the finger at others. Kudos.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 month ago

One thing I appreciate about Canadian elections is how quickly they happen. An election is called, campaigning is like a month or two and then we find out the new government just hours after casting our votes.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Not speaking for the rest of the thread, but...

  1. Biden should have said he wasn't up for reelección since day 1
  2. The Democratic Party hasn't known what to do since the 2016 election... at least.
[-] projectsquared@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I haven’t known what to do since the 2016 election. The “Fuck your feelings” bunch are clearly in their feels and ignoring documented events in what most of us call “reality “.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Biden was perfectly fine and IMO and him and his team do an excellent job at governing l, both domestically as well as with foreign policy (this looks like it was mostly him). He just let go of the pressure.

I would vote for him (not just against trump, but I genuinely think he was good at his job), but will vote for whomever will be the replacement (because I don't want trump to win).

[-] bolexforsoup 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Democratic Party hasn’t known what to do since the 2016 election…at least

The Democrats have won nationally in 2018, 2020, arguably 2022, and like 85% of special elections since 2016. What the fuck are you talking about? They’ve been basically non-stop winning elections since 2016.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

And yet we still don’t have abortion protections, gunshot wounds are the #1 cause of death in children, the housing market is on fire, the “minimum wage should be $15” conversation has been going on for so long that it should be nearly $30 now, there is an activist republican supermajority in the SCOTUS, and there are openly fascist candidates as republican front runners because the Overton window has shifted so far right.

Democrats haven’t been winning elections because people have been excited about good democrat candidates; They have been winning because democrat voters are terrified of a republican in office.

[-] HiddenLife@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Not only that, Republicans often begin undermining their opponent's reputation from day one, spending nearly four years focused on convincing the public that Biden is ineffective. Now, all that effort is erased at the most crucial time of the election. They no longer have years to shape public perception. This sets the stage for a fairer fight, and Harris is a more compelling speaker than Biden. I believe It was a good play.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

I’m excited AF… maybe the people you’re reading are republican plants that are just trying to make it feel like chaos.

The fact that this happened the weekend after the RNC makes me feel it was very well planned.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 27 points 1 month ago

Ever since the debate, people have been calling for Joe Biden to step down from the presidential race and give the place to someone else. ... Now I read the comments and everyone is criticizing and accusing the Democrats of not knowing what they're doing?

Lol, you thought those people were arguing in good faith.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Yes some of us been paying attention to who is backing him and who wasn't. Some of us had noticed that all the leftists in the party were still behind Joe Biden while all the neoliberals weren't. Some of us have noticed that the president who has protected worker rights and expanded consumer protection and wants to tax the wealthy is getting pushed out by the corporate Democrats.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 23 points 1 month ago

None of those things matter if he can't campaign effectively to beat his opponent.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

That's true, which is why I'm voting for whoever replaces them. I just can't view this as a victory.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 24 points 1 month ago

It's been chaos in the comments for a while now this is just catharsis for a lot of people and reaffirming for some of the naysayers.
You are gonna see a lot of takes from a lot of terminally online types.

Now just comes the actual work and it's gonna look chaotic for a while. I hope we get it together.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago

Ever since the debate, people have been calling for Joe Biden to step down

Yes, some.

Now I read the comments and everyone is criticizing and accusing the Democrats of not knowing what they’re doing

Yes, others.

Different people speak up on different days. This is especially true in social media where often people won't speak up if they know they're going to get jumped on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] archomrade@midwest.social 19 points 1 month ago

You're seeing the people who either didn't agree he should step down or agreed but didn't think they'd actually do it.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

IMO what is happening are disinformation bots trying to discourage people from voting.

It was first that you should stay home and not vote, because Democrats put an "old geezer who is not aware what is happening around him", now the same bots will be saying how Democrats were cheated by deciding their candidate without input of the voters, trying to replicate the upset that was over Bernie in 2016.

IMO I think Biden was excellent at governing, and no one will be as good as him when taking with foreign leaders, as he knew them all and had a good relation with them.

Having said that I will be voting for whomever Democrats put up (Kamala or anyone). I already got fooled to vote 3rd party in 2016 and won't make the same mistake.

[-] Juigi@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

I mean many here openly support Putin too, what can you do

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

It's fun, Lemmy having an option for searching user comments. See a user make a suss comment? Search their comments for 'Ukraine'. If they're a fascist, there's a good chance they can't help themselves but start talking about "Russia's legitimate security concerns" or "2014 coup"

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

They're not the same people.

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

All of this should have been done a couple years ago for presidential hopefuls to gather resources and prepare for the elections. The assumption that Biden was seeking a second term stalled a lot of minor steps needed to build a campaign. Biden stepping down a month before the DNC is gonna be a shit show. Who's gonna run for becoming a candidate? How are they gonna fundraise quickly enough to get the word out? This is a clusterfuck of poorly timed decisions and I only hope the new candidate can gather enough support to win the presidential election. Given the Democratic party's penchant of favoring people from their inner circle, I doubt they'll be well received by the general public to begin with.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Kroxx@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

Personally the best news I've heard in a while. I think there is a little bit of a knee jerk reaction happening because a lot is on the line and people are scared because it's such an unknown right now. When things settle more and the smoke clears I think everything will be more positive.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I personally just said last week that I believed only Biden was capable of beating Trump, so I’m feeling pretty sick right now. God, I hope I’m wrong.

We haaaaaavvvvvve to see this example and set a damn age limit for people to hold such high positions in our country. Old dude may have very well just sent us down an irreversible and utterly destructive path by seeking the office in the first place.

I know Bernie Sanders is old too, but damn I wish he had won the nomination. We wouldn’t be in this crisis right now. Still though, it’s a gamble electing people who are already waist deep in their grave.

Man

What a strange and historic month this has been. We’re all living in a very big moment in history right now, just, all the way around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Lemmy, as opposed to reddit, has seemed to be very much on the Keep Biden train for some reason.

I for one will be happy with any candidate that can do two to three campaign appearances per day for the next four months and doesn't have the Genocide Joe baggage. Everything else is gravy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Americans aren't a monolith.

load more comments (47 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1555 points (100.0% liked)

News

22852 readers
3330 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS