1190
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 174 points 1 year ago

I mean, Trump is also defending genocide too though...

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 141 points 1 year ago

Trump being worse deosn't mean we can't criticize Biden right now as the sitting president. I have been very supportive of the need to vote for Biden over Trump, but the Democrats need to stop doubling down on denying the atrocities in Gaza already.

Like they aren't even using nuance or anything at this point. Threateninng the ICC is absolutely ridiculous.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 year ago

This is unilaterally discrediting our country on the world stage. Trump was bad enough, but we could tell the world over half the county opposed him, and that he lost the popular vote.

This guy won the popular vote, and he's out there supporting genocide. What a fucking embarrassment to humanity these "leaders" are. Fuck them both.

Obligatory yes, I will be voting for Biden again to fend off Trump. I'll like it even less than I did last time, though.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 27 points 1 year ago

You are absolutely not obligated to say who you will be voting for.

If anything you've undercut your 'fuck them both' by following it with 'but of course I will be supporting THIS ONE SPECIFICALLY'.

Do what you want at the voting booth but don't undercut your own message by announcing your hand.

[-] BallotOrTheBullet@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Might I add, you will also undercut the concerted effort to supress DNC turn out. Just like every other election remember the ground rules; be cagey; be indirect; accuse people of moral failings; and never ever compromise or adjust your position.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

the ground rules; be cagey; be indirect; accuse people of moral failings; and never ever compromise or adjust your position.

Yes those are the rules of being a politician (gotem)

Why is it always the risk is suppressing VOTER behavior, and never a risk of intentionally suppressing the politician's genocidal desire? If it's a covert strategy to suppress voter turnout to raise the expectations of the voters, how does any protest ever effect change?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BallotOrTheBullet@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Buddy, our country is not so great on the world stage. You honestly think we can sink lower?

We've been down this road so many times and it's always a kick in the pants when we get hung up on it again and again. To properly take a moral stance you need to gain momentum before the primaries. Biden has not been shy about his stance on Isreal and bibi has been chasing this car like a dog on crack.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Buddy, our country is not so great on the world stage. You honestly think we can sink lower?

Oh, absolutely.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

First things first.

Criticizing Biden is fine, and everyone should, for the first three years and six months.

Also, if it wasn’t clear, Biden is super pissed off at Bibi for all his shit. But once trump is defeated we’ll all dogpile on. (Agree dissing ICC is vr bad as well fwiw)

Until then, there is not much difference between “not voting bc genoside” / “grr biden genocide democrats” and https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/09/16/1035851/facebook-troll-farms-report-us-2020-election/

I can only think people either are very aware of it (because it’s exactly right) or not aware of it at all, possibly their first time eligible to vote.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 40 points 1 year ago

But once trump is defeated we’ll all dogpile on.

So one of the other things that is very frustrating is always being told that we just need to wait until after the next election to criticize anything. Our election cycles never seem to end.

[-] androogee@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah man life is really fuckin frustrating. Welcome to earf.

[-] eltrain123@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

You absolutely should not be waiting until the next election cycle. You should be voicing your opinion, voting in off-cycle and local elections, and voting for the least harmful option in every election, including the presidential election. It’s a huge machine and voting once every 4 years for the pre-packaged candidate isn’t an effective strategy if you actually want things to change.

Vote for people that make things better in your community, city, county, state, and then think about federal elections. Displacing the trove of do-nothings or detrimental actors in the smaller elections will change sentiment in the parties and will change the candidates they put through in the primaries… but it will take years for that to happen.

Either that or revolution… but that’s going to be a whole lot worse for everyone for a few decades, best case scenario.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

That’s the problem. Most of the far left idealists don’t give a shit between elections. This happens every cycle. And every cycle they never learn.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

That's kind of how 'self rule' works. You're supposed to pay attention to politics.

People not voting is how we got in this mess in the first place.

Why do you think the GOP's final defense is always "both sides do it?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago

Bibi may lose this election for Biden, and spiral the world downward. This will only strengthen the ties the US has with Israel, however. Trump would absolutely throw a ton of weight behind them, and perhaps even involve the US directly in the genocide.

Bibi doesn't give a shit about Biden, and Biden is showing an astonishing amount of weakness by not standing up to him. I'm fucking embarrassed for him, and the entire democratic party.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago

If the only possible outcome is a strengthening of relations with a genocidal colonial project then the American democratic experiment has been dead for a long time

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Agreed. If the Bushes hadn’t fucked us up so much in the middle east already we’d have maybe at least one or two more options, but right-wing assholes like GDubz and Bibi ruin everything.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Bull, to the fucking shit. Genocide isn’t just something you can fucking put off. Unless you don’t really care about the genocide. Seems you’re more upset at the optics. And let’s also mention that Biden is not any more angry at the genocide than you seem to be. All his moves are token and theater and even that was only bought with mass protests and plunging confidence numbers.

People are being genocided ‘TODAY’

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Seems you’re more upset at the optics.

I’m more upset that in roughly twenty weeks’ time there is a critical, no-shit, very real existential threat to the actual democratic system that underpins this entire country, which as it happens supports much of the rest of the world, and a bunch of opportunistic yahoos would happily ignore it to bitch about one of the most progressive presidents we’ve had in forty years about an entirely different country’s genocide whose policies by the by is supported by that same existential motherfucking threat he’s fighting! For goddamned fuck’s SAKE what the hell is wrong with you.

The ‘biden genicide’ crowd is absolutely performing the russian trolls’ jobs admirably. And seem to be proud of it.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Also, if it wasn’t clear, Biden is super pissed off at Bibi for all his shit.

It really fucking isn't. At all. He recently went full genocide denier on Bibi's behalf.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 15 points 1 year ago

Democrats have no choice but to condemn the ICC and deny the genocide is happening because for some completely unknown reason the electorate has been lead to believe Israel is a good, moral state actor with absolutely no ill-intent and has never done anything wrong that was unjustified.

Now if they ever lie to me about Israel and I find out about it....

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago

Every time Bibi claims that the IDF is the most moral army in the world I roll my eyes.

[-] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

This is the reasonable take.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

Yes, but Republican voters pretty much ALWAYS vote, and they vote R down the whole ticket. A large portion of people who vote for Democrats only show up to vote if there is someone they can get excited about. Establishment Dems should consider this a law of the universe; it simply is the way it is. Instead of continuously trying to bully these people into showing up to vote (which has the opposite effect) maybe they should start asking what would get these people excited to vote for Joe. And then get Joe to do those things.

They act like everyone owes them a vote. They don't. They are asking for something from the left, they need to start negotiating in good faith and expect to have to give something in return. Doing anything less than whatever it takes to get people to vote for Joe should be considered them trying to lose and get Trump elected again.

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Democrats fall in love.

Republicans fall in line.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think the die-hard Trump cultists are genuinely in love with him, though.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And yet Democratic leadership keeps operating under the assumption that they can order Democrats to fall in line.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 3 points 1 year ago

I have a question, seriously: why are we looking to the President - the Chief Executive Officer - to define our policy? Isn't he supposed to only implement the policies that have been enacted by Congress? Despite how Rs tried to portray Obama, and how Trump would act if given half a chance, the role of President isn't identical to that of King - just how much leeway does he even have here? When tRump tried to insert himself in the opposite manner way back in the day, we impeached him - the President can propose but not define policy, right?

On that note, he did try to halt funding to Israel. Republicans in Congress overruled him. Ofc the reality is far more complex than what I am portraying here, b/c while he must enact existing policies, again he also should propose new ones too... which he isn't doing much of. But how could we even tell the difference between Biden attempting to "work within the (existing) system", set forth by our behind-the-scenes overlords and Congress + Supreme Court (heavy sidenote: with its current make-up, that Trump put into place), vs. him not really caring that much about the issue at all? Or really, at the end of the day, is there even a functional difference between them?

I don't know. I truly don't know. All I know is that while Biden may not be as liberal as people would have hoped, tRump is actively anti-liberal. And those are our two choices. :-( If we want better, perhaps we need to put forth some effort to make it happen. Like step up and actually run for office - and then dodge all the literal death threats + attempts that would result from conservatives for doing so. Otherwise, we get whatever they offer to us - they meaning those who will actually act rather than simply talk. Which remember, Biden is one of them, and he even has already made it to the short-list of the only two candidates who matter, which isn't nothing!

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago

He also called the ICC warrant against Israeli leaders outrageous and is stonewalling every attempt by the UN to intervene against Israel.

I don't think he gets a pass on this

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] archomrade@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago

Is this 'bOtH sIdEs'? or 'wHaTaBoUt TrUmP'?

[-] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago

The way I interpreted their comment is that people often mention Biden supports genocide and some people may assume Trump doesn't - so it's worth mentioning that of course Trump supports genocide too (on top of all the other horrible shit he supports contributing to why he shouldn't be in power).

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago

I would be amazed if anyone on lemmy.world was at all unaware of trump's encouragement of genocide.

I am amazed that anyone on lemmy.world could have possibly thought people on lemmy were unaware of Trump's encouragement of genocide.

I am not surprised that it seems to be the only concern.

[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

If I’ve learned anything about people through the past decade of politics its that you can never ever assume anything about people being intelligent in any group.

[-] daltotron@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If I've learned anything about political discourse it's that you have to assume that some level of mutual understanding is possible for communication to be worthwhile, and for everything to not devolve into back and forth trolling. So, while you can't assume intelligence, sure, you also kind of have to.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I would be amazed if anyone on lemmy.world was at all unaware of trump’s encouragement of genocide.

Plenty seem to think there's no difference between the two, so they're either unaware or fascists.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago

I actually think the the problem is that most here think there is a difference between Biden supporting genocide and Trump supporting genocide.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

"There's literally no difference between the position of Trump and Biden on the Palestinian genocide" - A Very Serious Archomrade

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

"There's literally a big difference between supporting a genocide but not wanting to and supporting a genocide and wanting to" - A very serious pugjesus.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

"There's literally a big difference between limited support for a state committing genocide and unlimited support for a state committing genocide."

Sorry that the concept of More being > than Less is, for some reason, confusing to you.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago

Is 'limited support' supposed to be threatening to sanction the ICC for pursuing charges against Israeli leaders?

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You have a very limited imagination, I see.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

I'm actually kind of afraid of yours.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

So given it an election year you could agree that comparing both potential future presidents is a healthy option.

Guess your argument is self-defeating, I'm gonna go for a hike 🤷🌲🌲

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

In an election year I would agree that agitating complacent liberals into caring about warcrimes is a healthy option

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
1190 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

9092 readers
2142 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS