Tried this with Bernie... The DNC rigged the primary... first goal needs to be to take over the Dem party. Which would actually be pretty easy since like 5 people show up to those elections, but only insiders really ever know about them.

If you're curious, every state, and many towns/counties have their own Democrat party... Find yours, figure out who the shills are and get like 10 people to vote for you to replace them during their next elections. The DNC leadership is elected by the state Dems, so once you've taken over your state you can start taking over the DNC.

This is a video... Unless you're suggesting that it's a deep fake, we absolutely know what happened here... What we don't know is what led up to this guy hulking out about Palestine... But it really doesn't matter. There is no justification for it. This is not normal or okay behavior under any circumstances. This guy is mentally ill and needs serious psychiatric help.

I nominate Cheney... Bring him on stage like she's going to thank him for his endorsement, then punch him in the face, then have a bunch of kids from Iraq and Afghanistan kick his ass. I'd watch that.

If you put some bacteria in a petri dish, they might even up creating a very complex system... But they'll always be constrained by the petri dish. We can look at the petri dish and say it's having XYZ effect, without necessarily having to get too into the weeds about the complexities of what's happening inside the dish.

One major problem with our current economic system is that it allows a small group of people to limit resources that would not naturally have to be limited (false scarcity). Sort of like if the rules called for throwing baseballs at people's heads to see the effects of TBIs.

The economy is not a natural phenomenon, it was designed... Economists explaining "how things work" is like someone explaining how baseball works... That's great, but it's time to change to an entirely different game, so you telling me how baseball works is worthless

Ugh... We need ranked choice so bad

"The war to end war" (also "The war to end all wars";[1] originally from the 1914 book The War That Will End War by H. G. Wells) is a term for the First World War of 1914–1918. Originally an idealistic slogan, it is now mainly used sardonically,[2] since not only was the First World War not history's final war, but its aftermath also indirectly contributed to the outbreak of the even more devastating Second World War.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_war_to_end_war

Imagine if all those people stood together against genocide instead of dividing over it. Women alone are like half the population... Why are they siding with genocide? They could elect anyone they want. Anyone with health insurance? That's almost everyone. Bam, anyone they want. If a gay person votes for genocide how much should I really give a shit about them? There's no "meaningful choice" because the libs get out early saying so... But if it's not this election then certainly by the next one, millennials and zoomers are gonna be done with the old boomer parties.. And good riddance

They've probably also figured out how many people saying that will actually fold with a little arm twisting. Would be super interesting to see those numbers.

Maga: don't threaten me with a good time

The war to end all wars!