1164
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kinther@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago

Do you know how a first past the post electoral system works? Or are you young and naive, thinking that politics isn't about compromise?

[-] hark@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Seems like compromise is "the political party does whatever they want and you guarantee your undying loyalty to them with your vote". You speak of youth and naivety, but only an idiot would accept such a "deal". If our votes have power then we should wield it.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The fact that you think voting is an undying loyalty and not a simple strategic decision baffles me, and embodies the exact argument I keep seeing on here. You know how you wield the power of your vote? USE IT. Voting 3rd party is really dumb right now but in theory okay. Not voting simply means you don't care.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

I don't think voting in general is undying loyalty, I think guaranteeing your vote to a party no matter what they do is undying loyalty. That's what they demand and expect because the other guy is worse, but if that's the strategy then they have no need to ever actually improve things because the other guy will always be worse.

[-] kinther@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

You have a choice between two candidates who can win the election. There is no third party who can win. You speak as if there is one in a first past the post electoral system. There isn't. If you have a way forward that doesn't further slide us into fascism and also isn't supportive of genocide, please enlighten me.

Sadly our only option is to not for for Trump, and the only other viable candidate is Biden. I don't like it anymore then you do, but until we replace our electoral system with one that is more fair, it's what we have to work with.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

If the threat of withholding your vote does not scare the party that is supposedly saving democracy, then they probably don't actually care about democracy, especially when they prioritize genocide over getting those votes.

[-] kinther@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I'd much prefer a ranked choice voting system where we had viable third parties. At the end of the day, one of two people will win the election. If you make one issue your entire focus, you lose sight of the big picture. I'll just say this - genocide is not a joke, it's fucked up, and I believe Israel is committing it in Gaza.

Putting that aside for now, do you care about anything else politically? Do you believe a woman should not be allowed to have an abortion, or do you support further tax cuts for the billionaires?

[-] 0xD@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago

You're arguing with basically bots.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Politics is absolutely about compromise, but Democrats never really compromise with progressives. The most we get is putting weed in the hands of the pharmaceutical companies, Yippee.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Sigh. They compromise with Republicans because they don't have all three of the house of representatives, the Senate, and the presidency. You want them to not compromise with Republicans? Give them all 3 consistently and overwhelmingly.

[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So, your only solution to fixing the country is to win a super majority every single election for all time, lest the next time the Republican wins, we will be a fascist dictatorship. Well, that doesn't seem very tenable, does it?

Guess we're just boned, right?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I'm saying if you want progress, then give Dems overwhelming and consistent victories.

You need to twist that to 'lest we be fascist dictatorship'. We'll see what happens after Trump, if the Republicans continue on that path. But whether they do or don't, we're back to progress and if you want progress.

[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I posits that Democrats are not the party of progress as long as they ignore progressives.

Im politically homeless.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

They can't be progressive when they keep losing any of the 1) House of representatives, 2) Senate, or 3) Presidency. You want progress? Give them all 3 consistently and overwhelmingly.

[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So literally what I said, we have to win overwhelming super majorities and every single branch where there's no hope for the country. Got it, untenable.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

your only solution to fixing the country is to win a super majority every single election for all time

Wow, the strategy of consistently voting for the party that most aligns with your values? What idiots!

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago

So that's a no then? About principles?

[-] kinther@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

So you're saying that... I should abide by principles... by allowing my country to further descend into fascism... by not voting for a politician that could prevent that...

...right. You're a smart mother fucker.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago

Don't be mad at me because I forced you to confront your own lack of principles. I've got a principle, personally, that won't allow me to vote for a genocidaire. I don't think that's a very high fucking bar. If we have found ourselves at an election where our choices are between two fascists, then we are already in fascism. If there is no way to vote for "no genocide" then there is no serious reason to vote.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

I’ve got a principle, personally, that won’t allow me to vote for a genocidaire. I don’t think that’s a very high fucking bar.

Pretty clearly it's not a very high bar, since you're supporting an intensification of that genocide and the commencement of several others. That's a bar too low to limbo under.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

Yeah man, I'm sorry but if you're doing a genocide, fuck you. I've got nothing but hate for you. I don't care who you are, or who might also do the same thing. I'll hate them too. That's what a principle is. If more people had such a principle maybe we could make real political changes instead of giving "political capital" to war criminals.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah man, I’m sorry but if you’re doing a genocide, fuck you. I’ve got nothing but hate for you.

It's a shame you hate yourself so much. Wait, if you're pursuing multiple genocides, as you are by furiously seeking a Trump victory, is your hate multiplied?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Looks like you lost another one.

Ready to shift that full throated rhetoric yet?

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

"Lost another one"?

What are you on about?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

I made the point earlier about how your approach to rhetoric is counter productive.

You've argued in just about every subthread of this entire post. You go down each one and there is @PugJesus@lemmy.world trying to convince someone that they should support Biden. But you haven't convinced a single person that your stance is a stance they should adopt. In fact, when I review the threads, it looks like they've moved farther away from the position you want them to take.

Maybe its you, the basis of your argument, and your approach to rhetoric that's at issue.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

What makes you think I'm trying to convince them? I've explicitly said otherwise elsewhere. I don't believe fascists can be saved. They've already dipped down into embracing genocide, and nothing will wring that wretched stink out of them.

But demonstrating the horrendously immoral implications of the talking points they parrot can show others who have only considered the surface of the talking points what absolute genocidal dogshite they're peddling.

In fact, when I review the threads, it looks like they’ve moved farther away from the position you want them to take.

lmao, what, they decided that instead of supporting more genocide, they'll support more genocide even harder? Doubt.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

You are completely lost if you think you are arguing against genocide.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Okay, you’ve hit on exactly what I don’t get.

Most Federal elections aren’t about good vs. bad. They’re about choosing the lesser of two evils. That’s important to remember.

As I see it, a vote for Biden OR Trump is a vote supporting genocide. On that one issue, sadly, there’s no real choice.

However, voting for Trump also brings with it sexism, racism and an inevitable threat to democracy - in addition to genocide. Crucially, changing the system for the better would become MUCH harder under Trump. Choosing not to vote at all (or voting for a 3rd party candidate with no real chance of winning) helps Trump. It would be giving up on yourself, and society as a whole. It would be saying that things are too broken to be fixed, ever, so it’s okay to let future generations suffer.

I don’t see the moral benefit in failing to choose the lesser of two evils.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 months ago

A system that only allows you to choose between two enthusiastic war criminals should be given up on. There is no saving or reforming such a system. An election boycott and riots in the street are a preferable choice as far as I'm concerned.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Well? We're waiting.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

What are you doing about electoral reform, I'm curious

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

I'm not doing shit about electoral reform. I would like to understand exactly the kind of optimism it takes to believe that meaningful electoral reform is a real possibility. Give me your realistic roadmap to a materially better system, accomplished through reforming the current one. I don't expect a detailed plan, but what are the broad strokes?

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

So you refuse to engage in the system and refuse to try to replace it? What the fuck are you doing here complaining? You have no right to complain, you're literally doing nothing and watching the ship sink around you and shouting "hey! This sucks! I sure wish it was different!" How about you help fix it? Literally what are you doing like why would you do this you're wasting everyone's time

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

What do you want me to say? I do what I can. I could tell you at least some of what I do, but I doubt it would satisfy you. Hell, tbh it doesn't really satisfy me. Are you satisfied with what you are doing? I'm assuming you're doing more than just guaranteeing Biden your vote and arguing with me. If I'm wasting anyone's time it's my own, you are free to scroll on.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] hark@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

When full support for genocide is "the lesser of two evils" then you've already lost. It's straight up evil.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

It can ALWAYS get worse

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

They’re about choosing the lesser of two evils. That’s important to remember.

Which is why evil always wins.

[-] theonyltruemupf@feddit.de 9 points 6 months ago

So you base your voting decision on an abstracted philosophical argument? Maybe take a good look at the US voting system and ask yourself what happens when Trump wins because people like you upheld their "principles".

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago

I don't understand why it is so hard to grasp that opposition to an ongoing genocide is not "an abstracted philosophical argument". Wake the fuck up. It's real, and it's happening right now. The guy you insist I vote for is angry at the idea that anyone (not even himself) be held criminally responsible!

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

It'a abstract because you aren't considering the consequences of your vote. Here are your choices:

  • Genocide, unions, anti-monopoly actions, infrastructure, healthcare, loan forgiveness, an excellent cabinet, and some other things that I would consider generally good

  • Genocide, insurrection, corruption, hypocrisy, and literally so many negative things to list that I'm not capable of enumerating even a fraction of the total list

  • Either of the above is fine, pick whichever

Those are your ONLY three options. It does not matter why you choose one. It does not matter what you believe, what principles you hold, or what you personally would do as president. The future that we find ourselves in comes down to this choice and this choice only. I cannot understand how a good person who understands this would make the wrong choice, so my goal is to make it as easy to understand this as possible.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago

Your argument is the abstract one. You are laying out what I think are mostly bullshit choices, based on hypotheticals and assumptions (abstract). I am talking about what is happening right now (not abstract).

I am definitely not going to get drawn into the finer points of what Biden has or hasn't done or even more lamely, what he might or mightn't do, but I will say this: I do not give one fuck about anything in your list compared to genocide. Like are you for real? Genocide but at least some loan forgiveness? Gross.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

The options are genocide and loan forgiveness, or genocide and no loan forgiveness. Also nice job picking the least important item in that list.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

Nice job including it in the list. I think it is sick to try to bribe me (with any of those things) into supporting genocide. Also, be honest with yourself, out of all those things you listed do you genuinely think Biden would somehow deliver on any of them (except the genocide)?

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Nice job including it in the list.

I mean, I think it's cool and good, but it was still lame to downplay the importance of the choice of your vote by choosing it.

bribe

How

supporting genocide

Again, I've laid out in great detail why I think it's the least genocide-supportive action possible for us to make at this time* and therefore why it is explicitly the opposite of supporting genocide.

* voting + direct action would be better, but since that includes voting, it doesn't matter for my point here

Also, be honest with yourself, out of all those things you listed do you genuinely think Biden would somehow deliver on any of them (except the genocide)?

I really don't want to have to keep a list, because I think this stuff is obvious, but I feel like at this point I should.

Unions: Biden is the most pro-union president in history. Example:

https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/joe-biden-labor-union-endorsements-donald-trump/?intcid=CNM-00-10abd1h

"Nearly all the major labor unions have endorsed Mr. Biden. The board of the AFL-CIO, which represents 60 unions and has over 12 million members, was one of the first to endorse him in June last year, 17 months before the general election.

Over 30 organized national labor groups have endorsed Mr. Biden, including LiUNA, a construction workers union with many Latino and Black members, and the United Auto Workers (UAW). Many endorsed Mr. Biden in 2020, and exit polling shows he won 56% of union households nationwide, compared to 40% for Trump, nearly double 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's support."

Anti-monopoly actions: Within about one week, the following anti-corporate actions occurred:

These aren't all anti-monopoly per se but I had this list on hand and it's similar enough imo

Infrastructure: See the infrastructure bill and its effects

Healthcare: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/03/06/fact-sheet-president-biden-takes-new-steps-to-lower-prescription-drug-and-health-care-costs-expand-access-to-health-care-and-protect-consumers/

Loan forgiveness: This happens like twice a month, most recently today!

https://apnews.com/article/biden-student-loan-cancellation-debt-forgiveness-60ffeaec17737d6317b4aee188893cc4

An excellent cabinet: idk literally just google them. I'm not explaining how what we have now is better than Betsy DeVos & Co. Biden picked a cabinet and he chose well.

And many other good things that aren't exciting but are extremely important (here's the most recent Biden article I've seen): https://lemmy.world/post/15676395

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theonyltruemupf@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago

The only other option is indefinitely worse, so the responsible thing to do is voting for Biden. You can still oppose the war on Gaza. Protest it. Be loud. Fight to change the shitty undemocratic voting system of the US. Not voting Biden will not save a single life in Gaza. You are the one who needs to wake up.

this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
1164 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5491 readers
1838 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS