639
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] self@awful.systems 21 points 7 months ago

it’s very important to me that you don’t type the words “Blake Stacey” into a search engine while explaining quote unquote Quatnum stuff to them

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

it’s very important to me that you don’t type the words “Blake Stacey” into a search engine while explaining quote unquote Quatnum stuff to them

randoms from /all wandering into the vale of sneers: https://www.buttersafe.com/2008/10/23/the-detour/

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 7 months ago

many such cases!

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Oh I see... I didn't realize you were trying to tell me I was talking to Blake Stacey or that he was respected in Quantum Mechanics. I completely misinterpreted what you were trying to tell me. I blame it on the inability of text to properly convey sarcasm.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 7 months ago

you couldn't even be affronted with wit? dire

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I had mis-interpreted the comment to along the lines of something like "You're just copying and pasting what you heard of Spirit Science aren't you?"

My most humble apologizes. Maybe I just wasn't paying hard enough attention.

this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
639 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1489 readers
32 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS