711
submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

If Biden stepped down and Warren was on the ballot again I would definitely vote in this upcoming election.

[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago
[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

You’re brainwashed. The system is the problem. They want us peasants playing the imaginary game fighting with each other instead of unifying and making real change. You’re a pawn.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Nice not-fighting there, idiot.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ad hominem. I don’t participate in fear based politics or hate based discussion. Try again.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Ad hominem is when you try to attack someone's ideas by attacking their character instead. I'm not doing that. I'm just calling you an idiot.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That’s not the definition but using ignorance to fit your narrative just like a politician. Nice.

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Unifying and making real change means coming together and voting against the fascist that's going to make everything worse.

Feeling righteous about not doing the one thing that can actually help is immature and stupid.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ad hominem. I don’t participate in fear based politics or hate based discussion. Try again.

[-] doubletwist@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

If you're not either participating in politics by voting, running for office or campaigning; or actively attempting to overthrow the government, then you are accepting whatever government we have and whatever government gets voted in.

There's nothing morally wrong in voting for the less-bad of available. options now, while still working toward changes that give us better choices in the future. If nothing else, if you really cared about how this country and world runs, you would at least be voting for whoever you think will give you even a SLIGHTLY better chance of allowing or enabling the change you want to see.

The absolute least useful thing you could possibly do is throw up your hands and give up and not participate. As a matter of fact, that's exactly what extremes on both ends of the political spectrum want you to do. The fewer people who participate, the easier it is for them to get away with all the money and power.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It’s the opposite. They need your participation to keep the machine churning. The more you care about red vs blue the more money they make and the longer the system prospers with little real change. Another 4 years of Trump is what the Democratic Party needs to get off their asses (no pun intended) and actually give us somebody who’s gonna make real changes.

It’s all business, you’re the consumer and our lives are the currency. If you’re not buying what they’re selling, they’re gonna need to give you what you want.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 2 years ago

So close but still framing it as "Blue needs to save us so we need to punish them with Red", which is still red vs blue thinking

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

nope, they're right. I'd vote for Warren and I'd drop my prohibition against voting blue in any race. I don't love warren, but I think she has virtues, I'd be voting for something, and I could at least half hope that the things I'm voting against wouldn't happen if she won. plus she stands a much better chance of actually fucking winning; non-trumpers dont hate her.

I will not under any condition vote biden, and if the blues run him, a D by your name gets you the same treatment as an R in my book.

dangling us over a fascist cliff is not endearing behavior. I will not vote for a terrorist.

[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

You're still the problem even if you pretend to be above it. Trying to prop up your argument with the morality of not choosing the lesser evil does nothing but make you feel better about yourself in "refusing to compromise your principals". This is reality and the reality is we live in a two party system. By not voting for one you are actively supporting the other.

So rather than three paragraphs of idealistic bullshit you should just truncate it down to:

"I support Trump" -melpomenesclevage

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm not refusing to compromise.warren would be a compromise.

biden is making trump more of a threat to get himself elected. that's not okay. if he doesn't step down, he's okay with that wager, and I don't want him near power.

fascist edging is irresponsible and not something I'll vote for. especially if it doesn't even stop the genocides!

[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Is voting Warren for president an option? Quit being a jackass.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

its not.because of Joe biden.

again, I don't even like biden. don't worry, I'll stay politically engaged; I just won't be wasting my time at a voting booth.

[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Cool. So what you're saying is you are perfectly ok with Trump being president, just so long as you don't have to vote for Biden. That is the reality we are staring down the barrel of. You might not like having to vote for him, but if there are not enough votes under the Biden column then we will have a second term of Donald Trump. Keep what-ifing and patting yourself on the back.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm saying biden is threatening me with a trump presidency by not stepping down. I'm not okay with that.

I thought this was a jokefour years ago,but you people really are just as bad.

when your only point of favor is 'they're worse' you can't really avoid the comparison.

[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

You. Do. Not. Get. To. Choose. Who. Runs. For. President.

Rather than accepting that reality, you're choosing to sit and watch as a Trump presidency happens and say "Whelp. My hands are tied" rather than do your part in voting in the far superior option.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Don't bother. They want fascism, they're just too cowardly to admit it.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

There was a primary. She didn't run.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

because the party would take it as an insult, and her career would be over.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Sounds like you've made a compelling argument as to why what you're demanding isn't a real option, so you'll need a better excuse as to why you're refusing the only rational option you have.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ioughttamow@kbin.run 44 points 2 years ago

Vote against trump then? Unless you never want to vote again I guess

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago
[-] HandMadeArtisanRobot@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately that's not how our system currently works. The least you can do is undo one Nazi's vote

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I’ll vote for any candidate who wants to change the voting system. RCV or some other alternative voting method. Changing the electoral college vote. I’ll vote for that. Not about fear-based voting. Good luck in this upcoming election!

[-] cori 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Trump's first term resulted in abortion bans that are actively making women die. Next targets on the list will be banning birth control and GAHT. These will also cause people to die. That's not to mention how much worse Trump's positions are on Israel/Palestine and Russia/Ukraine. Is it worth it to you to stand by and watch innocent, marginalized people die in the name of your personal political ideals? Elections are about way more than the idiosyncrasies of the political process. Literal human lives are on the line.

[-] brianary@startrek.website 13 points 2 years ago

I'm pretty sure they only care about their performative solipsism.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I’m pretty sure you only care about the political circlejerk you subscribe to. Cum-stained high fives all around with your cronies. Demand real change. Don’t play into fear politics.

[-] brianary@startrek.website 4 points 2 years ago

Touché. Hit a nerve, I guess.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Neither candidate cares about people’s lives. Biden could have expanded the court but let Roe/Wade happen. His foreign policy is going to put us in the middle of a war. No different than Trump. We could have already had RCV or some other voting system that allows us to vote for who we actually want instead of fear based voting. Biden could have stepped down and given people a candidate they wanted to vote for. Anything that happens is theirs and your own faults for letting them spin you in hamster balls or decades and scaring you into demanding change. They’ve forced your hands every time and now you’re crippled by the system. Demand change. Don’t play the game. I don’t subscribe to fear politics. Good luck.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

You think first past the post voting is something that gets changed in a presidential election? Really?

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

No. I’ll vote for somebody who wants to change it while in office. Surprised you would think otherwise…

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Well now I'm even more confused, no you don't think a president's going to be the one to change first past the post, but yet you want to vote for someone who will? So you're just straight up saying you're never going to vote? This makes no sense.

When you stop letting anything excuse your apathy, maybe you'll be able to start understanding that to change first past the post you have to work at the local levels first. Which I'm sure you don't do because apathetic people don't get involved in local politics passionately.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It’s a constitutional issue if you knew anything. It can happen federally like Roe/Wade or it can be at the state level like many states have done. President can push to make it happen while in office. Not during this current election year.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HandMadeArtisanRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Somebody with a mind of their own! Nice to meet you!

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

Vote for not criminalizing human being? Vote for not giving tax breaks to the wealthy?

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You can vote based on fear. I’ll sit this one out until there’s a candidate I actually want to lead our country.

[-] HandMadeArtisanRobot@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

It sounds like you're looking at this like you're choosing someone to marry. I'll wait for the one. I don't want to settle. Etc... but you may never, ever get a candidate you like. Instead, I suggest you think of it like picking a city bus. Is this one going where I want to go? Probably not but it's closer. And unfortunately, in this metaphor, you have to get on a bus anyway. "Sitting this one out" just means getting on someone else's bus.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

It's okay, when the Nazis come, they'll realize that he is a purist and will not do anything bad to him.

this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
711 points (100.0% liked)

News

36201 readers
2710 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS