419
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] player1@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago

For the millionth time it’s not that simple. Retrofitting commercial buildings is often impossible or more expensive than just demolishing and building new which is also ungodly expensive especially with how high interest rates are right now. Unless cities step in with millions of dollars per project it’s usually not financially possible.

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 34 points 1 year ago

If the problem is money then there is no problem. It becomes a necessity and you can't just not afford necessity. We allegedly are the richest country they need to figure it out regardless of cost. That simple.

It's like climate change, there is no issue with money it just has to get done. Pay for it regardless of the cost. It is necessary

[-] boreengreen@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

But what if we let the children pay for it when they grow up? Yes, the cost will be several orders of magnitude more, but we don't have to think about that now.

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Just jubilee the debt away? Bro money is fake, who cares?

[-] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, hopefully fewer people from the future generation will be homeless. It's pretty rough starting out now, especially if you aren't lucky enough to have a wealthy family.

What we've been doing for the last number of years just isn't working. The solution isn't to keep procrastinating it indefinitely. There has always been debt that's pushed onto future generations, but this debt might actually help them.

I wish that people started building more housing many years ago. If housing was cheaper, increased taxes wouldn't be as big of a concern. This is because there would also be more money available to spend. This means spending money for food, transportation, schooling, and more.

Instead, currently many people are using the limited housing as investments and retirement plans. Life expectancies are increasing, and births are still happening. Where do you propose people live if there isn't housing available?

Rural forests in uninhabited areas also aren't a legitimate option for most people. No running water, no heat, no medical care available, no pharmacies, no stores, no places to work, and nowhere to buy tools to build shelter. That sounds like a very bad time for most people.

Retrofitting commercial buildings is often impossible or more expensive than just demolishing

That sounds like a "them" problem.

They can watch their investments dry up and lose billions, or pivot to the new market. Not our fault they're stuck in the 80s.

[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I live on the North end of the SF Bay Area and literally every empty lot and a shit load of pasture land and open space is currently being developed into either low income apartments, high end apartments, town houses or track homes. It's honestly kind of shocking. Everywhere you go, new residential development.

Sonoma County supervisors were supposed to vote on a housing development plan in January, but failed to do so until August, and in the meantime there was a special rule that allowed builders to go ahead without most of the red tape they usually face. They took the opportunity and ran with it.

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

This is such bullshit. It doesn't cost millions of dollars to add new plumbing, HVAC, and interior walls.

[-] shutz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Say you have an average size house, with a 2-car garage on the side. You decide to change that garage into a small apartment for renting. You need to add a wall or two, add insulation, build up a kitchen area (with proper water and power) and a bathroom.

Imagine how much that would cost you for that single apartment. Now multiply that by, say, 50, to convert a large office building into 50 residential rental units. Even with economies of scale, that's still going to cost millions...

[-] CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Dude... you're arguing that it's better to tear down, and build from scratch then it is to retro fit. This is obvious bullshit. In your example it would be more practical to retro fit the garage then to tear it down, and build a new building. Like fuck man.

[-] player1@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/real-estate/why-empty-offices-aren-t-being-turned-housing-despite-lengthy-n1274810

“ In parts of the country where land is relatively cheap, it's far less expensive to build housing from scratch than to convert old offices.”

[-] Ashelyn 1 points 1 year ago

But high density residential operates to radically different specs. Proper fire escape routes accessible from each dwelling, at least one or more exterior windows to the outdoors per dwelling, individualized electricity and other utilities, and various other considerations. Retrofitting the electricity to get every unit on its own metered connection is a beast of a task by itself. You also have to account for the plumbing being used not only for the toilets/sinks, but also showers, baths, cooking, and junk getting dumped down the pipes in every unit.

[-] player1@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Actually it’s not bullshit. Most office buildings are designed with large core space where the elevators and stairs etc go. That’s not at all how apartment buildings are designed. Changing that is extremely expensive.

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
419 points (100.0% liked)

News

23207 readers
3052 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS