642
this places needs leftist rules
(lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
642 points (100.0% liked)
196
4661 readers
1791 users here now
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
More leftists, less tankies
Yeah, but they're also so authoritarian they end up creating a police state that is not too different from a fascist one.
Wrong, and may you never see the real difference
Truly whenever a government says things like "you can't have child brides or slaves" it is authoritarianism, big think
ok
Me when I'm up against Jordan Peterson in a Pretending To Not Understand Words Contest
As a general rule I don't engage in definition nitpicking arguments because they're almost universally fartsniffing contests between people with too high opinions of themselves. That's why Jordan Peterson does it all the time. There's a lot of cool information to be gleaned from etymology and linguistics, unfortunately most people only engage with the topic to use as a shiv for some other political point they want to make but are too insecure to directly engage with.
You clearly know what meaning was intended to be conveyed by the word. So if you know what people mean when they say something, why pretend like you don't? It's dishonest.
"All governments are inherently authoritarian. [...] I have no idea what this individual actually meant. That theyre mad they cant murder someone or theyre mad they cant vote for highly technical government positions that should be based on merit, not popularity."
See, there it is. You're trying to softball a political argument by pretending it's an linguistic argument, and I have no respect for this level of cowardice and dishonesty, nor do I have the patience to beat around the bush looking for the real argument.
Next time, if you want to be taken seriously, just own it instead of bullshitting. Say what you believe and stand on your principles.
Definitely not true for lemmy.
Not a lot of them, but they're really loud and prolific in their posting
Propaganda 101.
lemmy.ml? Opinion discarded.
Another opinion from a lemmy.ml user, opinion discarded.
Wow what a loser position to take.
Fuck China, long live Taiwan.
Fuck Canada, Long live Alberta.
I hope Alberta fucking leaves honestly. We'll trade the US New England for Alberta.
So instead of hoping for the best and wanting to improve the lives of your far right conservative, borderline nazi embarrassment of a province, you want to get rid of them?
You're literally worse than china.
It's not happening, think trying to convince Alabama to become a blue state. Their oil industry will keep them conservative. They want to join the US, I say let them.
Oh, so you do understand the taiwan situation, you just think the solution is making them suffer instead of trying to improve their lives.
The Taiwanese want to remain independent, this choice needs to be respected. Fuck China for trying to take an independent Taiwan by economic or military force, this is basically what the US is trying to do to Canada (economic force)
If the Albertans want to leave Canada, that choice should also be respected.
A/B: citation needed
C: Only if you believe their quality of life is dependent on being Canada, even against their own wishes.
The only way it happens is a referendum. So it will be clearly the will of the people. (Also ignoring the fact the land is technically owned by the natives).
Also, have you been to Alberta? I grew up there. It may not be a vast majority, but it's far from a loud small minority.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-janet-brown-may-2025-poll-separation-sentiment-1.7544074
3 in 10 think we should seperate, up from 20% in 2022
I guess we should rep up and coming empires instead?
I feel like Britain kinda had that, as did other less imperialistic countries in Europe that also fought the Nazis. Does that make the British empire any better? No, they were still an empire that did bad shit, and they're on track to lose all those gains to human well-being they've seen since WWII
Exciting, please name one
China is the biggest example. They might've been knocked down for a while by western powers, but they're on track to dominate the 21st century after exploiting global capitalism better than America ever did. They've been exerting economic coercion and disputing the borders of basically all their neighbors so much that many of them would rather ally with the evil empire just to balance things out. Russia also got severely curtailed following the collapse of the Soviet empire, but they're looking to rebuild it.
There are many other smaller scale forces that seek more local conquest and spheres of influence. Turkish nationalists wish to rebuild the ottoman empire, which is extra funny when you're in a federation with some of the places you're trying to conquer. India could be a major empire in the future, but they're not quite there yet. Israel is looking to carve out a Jewish ethnostate with the backing of western supremacists.
Of course, that's a bit more than one 😁
When the fuck did I say they were worse than the evil empire? It's definitely a better place to live for most people right now, but that's mostly incidental. Just like whenever the US or USSR were better in one context or another, empires can support themselves in good and bad ways. Fascist states are typically all bad, where liberal and Marxist spouting empires tend to have both genuinely redeeming qualities and broken ideals to their name.
There are no good empires, and the second you buy into one being fundamentally different you've eaten the propaganda. Many Marxists forget how imperialism is an evil that far predates capitalism, an evil necessary for allowing capitalism in the first place. Thinking that evil will meaningfully destroy capitalism is the greatest con imperialism ever pulled. Even the empires that actually rejected capitalism in the 20th century were big fans of genocide, violent repression, and cults of personality. Now those empires are all fascist or neoliberal.
Aside from naming China as imperialist. What I am interested in the idea of Russia wanting to rebuild the soviet union. I have no idea how you got to it, but the Putin government is more aligned with the spirit of the Russian Empire. In no way they want to come back to soviet union any more than to claim the nostalgia behind it and the achievements associated with it.
The Soviet Union was functionally a Russian empire. It centralized power around its imperial core, refusing to exist in a coequal federation with the other member states. It's why it fell apart and why Putin sees its collapse as such a tragedy.
China is imperialist without even considering Taiwan. They violate the sovereignty of all their neighbors in the same ways Chinese empires have done historically. They embrace social conservatism in their moves to take rights from women and suppress queer people. They play into nationalism more every year, not because they're a smol beans, but because they're embracing increasingly fascist strategies with the rest of the world. It doesn't make them unique, it makes them no different from the rest.
Assuming ideology trumps geopolitical "realism" is naive. Ideology is a inconvenient but necessary tool for building power in hierarchical systems.
The new silk roads are indeed an imperialist move…
More Allendes, fewer Fidels?
I'd rather have more Malatesta, Zapata and Ocallan.
Those have done ok locally, but there are reasons why such movements haven't aquired the importance or the results of other socialist experiments, e.g no rapid industrialization. I hope they never have to face open threats of genocide and extermination by capitalist armies as the Bolsheviks or the North Koreans did.