421
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world to c/onehundredninetysix
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lath@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

Why sly eyes? Curious or innocent would've been more.. apt.

[-] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 55 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I do not know where you're coming from here. Pinnochio wants to be a real boy. He'll be what he eats, so he's going to eat a real boy so he becomes one himself. Nothing about that matches curiosity or innocence. Pinnochio has a dasterdly, horrific plan, which he aims to enact. Sly is more apt, if not alittle understated.

[-] lath@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's only dastardly to those who know it's dastardly.

Pinocchio isn't human, doesn't know what being human means and barely understands the concepts of right and wrong as most humans ascribe to. Hell, even we disagree on some points in this regard, let alone a puppet made of wood whose own physical limitations are different from our own.

Even we still have isolated cannibal tribes who eat human flesh as a way of life. To us, that's evil and horrific, to them it's just life. So why wouldn't a being unbound by our moral standards take that sentence at face value and accept it as simple truth? Why must it be sly and conniving? Because we consider it to be as such? That's both a foolish and flawed way of thought.

There are many cultural differences around the world, some of which are fought over zealously, and I can't help but feel that they blind us to all the varied points of view which exist outside our own restrictive norms.

Sly might be the only way you see as horrific, yet your own way of life might seem horrific to others.

To me, the reason you don't see where I'm coming from is because as a reader, you restricted yourself to a certain perspective. Yours.

[-] 007ace@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 weeks ago

curious or innocent eyes? That would not imply that he was going to eat children.

[-] lath@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

On the contrary. Knowing it's a two-sentence horror fanfic provides the unsaid context.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you have to tell me your two sentence horror story is a horror story, it's not a horror story.

Kinda like you can't tell people a joke is funny when they don't laugh.

[-] lath@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Without the third comment in the screenshot telling us it's a two-sentence horror fanfic, would you have been absolutely certain this screenshot was about a two-sentence horror fanfic?

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes. I got the horror vibe from the first comment and didn't need to have it spelled out. Slyly looking at the elementary school obviously implies he's going too eat one or more kids to become a real boy.

This is classic 'show, don't tell' writing.

[-] lath@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Then i guess you are part of the intended audience.

[-] djsoren19 24 points 2 weeks ago

sure, but if you use sly you can get the joke without the unnecessary context.

The actual reason is probably the word's association with foxes. "sly fox sneaking into henhouse" is I believe the visual metaphor they were going for.

[-] lath@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Then I guess it's not an improvement, but a different way of presenting it.

Using sly suggests furtive intent. My alternative was intended as a matter-of-fact approach. The former looks to sneak as if to not get caught, the latter pursues openly as if only a natural course.

[-] elevenbones@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

Put the pipe down bud

[-] Philharmonic3@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Why y'all hating? This person is right! It's more Apt for Pinocchio to be curious, maybe "wide eyes"? I think it adds to the horror for Pinocchio to not know that it is evil to eat children

[-] derek@infosec.pub 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The suggested alternatives don't work though because they're superfluously suggestive. We have a few ways to fine-tune the story. I'm not sure there's an inarguable improvement but, to my taste, I see two.

"Well... You are what you eat!" She replied.

Pinocchio's gaze moved slowly toward the school.

  1. It doesn't matter who the speaker is. If the reader is familiar with the original story and they assume correctly that's fine. We don't need the information for our delivery though. Dropping the reference makes for a cleaner read.
  2. Ixnay the garnish. I considered "eager gaze" but that still felt clunky. Communicating the action in a way which mirrors the unspoken internal processing of the monstrous consideration itself leads to a more powerful realization for the reader. It now paints a scene instead of hinting how the reader should feel about it.

Part of my execution comes down to styling, and I'm particular, but packaging compact work for ease of digestion and letting the words rest as they fall leads the reader succinctly to our intended moment (which, as I understand it, is the purpose of the exercise).

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
421 points (100.0% liked)

196

4565 readers
1719 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS