725
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GoobyMcMooby@lemmy.zip 81 points 1 week ago

I think it’s about time the press and protesters start showing up strapped. These people clearly don’t have any fear and are just power tripping on people for simply being there. Put the fear of God back into these pigs.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago

Escalation to violence is exactly what they want. It gives them all the justification they need to invoke the Insurrection Act, declare martial law and suspend your Constitutional rights. And not just in California.

[-] GoobyMcMooby@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 week ago

I didn’t say start blasting. Right wingers show up strapped all the time showing they mean business and are given plenty of space as a consequence. The cops can do the same for other Americans. If they can’t then it shows the public that it was never about individual rights and all about allowing one group they favor to get away with it.

[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Protesters urged not to give trump administration pretext for what it is already doing

edit: Oh, what the hell. Let's add a snippet.

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass publicly urged protesters Monday not to give the Trump administration any pretext for what they’re already doing and will keep doing no matter what. “Angelenos—don’t engage in violence and give the administration an excuse to inflict all the damage they have been inflicting carte blanche for months on end,” said Bass, adding that Trump and his team are just looking for a reason to respond with violence, as they would have done whether or not any of this happened.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

That's an Onion article. You can tell because Trump hasn't been shooting protesters for months already. That's what comes next. And that's when it stops being a protest, and turns into a civil war.

Don't be so eager to make that happen.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago

It's looking pretty inevitable at this point.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Only if people go into this looking for it.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

You mean like the Trump administration?

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

All it takes is a single police officer to put on plain clothes and to throw a brick. They do that on the regular, let’s stop this “don't do ANYTHING disruptive or could be considered violent! It will escalate!” Nonsense

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He's already ordered soldiers in, who have shot journalists and protestors

[-] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

That was the police that shot them. Not soldiers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Maybe if we just ask nicely he will stop. Has anyone tried doing that?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 1 week ago

Why would I reject the good timeline where the fascist superpower has a civil war instead of destroying the world?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Where does the goal post moving stop? It’s not an escalation of violence if you don’t use it. It’s a threat to escalate to violence. If they aren’t afraid of you then they’re not going to change.

When they declare martial law are you going to be saying the same thing and hoping by just chanting loudly you change their mind?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 19 points 1 week ago

So what? Do you just watch until you're being herded into concentration camps anyway? This is the first instance of effective resistance to Trump (the April parades don't count) since January and they're calling in the Marines already. This was simply never going to end peacefully, because any effective act of mass resistance was going to be suppressed violently; avoiding escalation means avoiding resistance.

Edit: This person is not arguing in good faith. I cornered them in this thread and they claimed that ICE won't shoot people unless provoked and then that they're shooting people to provoke an escalation. Their argument seems to hinge on the idea that rubber bullets are harmless pranks you should just suck up.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Resistance doesn't have to include escalation. Leave that to them...they are going to escalate anyway. If the protesters are the ones doing it, then they just handed Trump exactly what he wants...a legal justification for his actions.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

Neither Trump nor his followers give a flying fuck about legal justifications, and any so-called moderate who cares about that is a fascist in denial. Solidarity is indispensible when fighting tyranny, and solidarity demands that when members of your community are being kidnapped by the Gestapo you fight back, not watch and cry about legal justifications.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Escalation to violence is exactly what they want.

Are you sure? It seems like the escalation is what they don't want. And that's why they're having to call in the marines to try and scare people back into submission.

Passive acquiescence and blind obedience is what they want. That's why the news media is so eager to label these protests as abnormal, intolerable, and anti-American. If the conservatives wanted protests, they wouldn't be so eager to censor the protests' advocates and so worried about valorizing these opposition efforts.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Is that why they're shooting random protesters with rubber bullets, even though there's no justification? What are they trying to "prevent"?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Further protest and disruption of ICE raids by protesters.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Problem is the situation won't improve without an escalation

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago

Californians have a right to defend themselves

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

If they want escalation then they can take it when ever they want. Police just wear plain clothes and throw a brick. Bam and done, at this point it’s best to just assume violence and act accusingly, it’s not like the media are impartial.

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

The people of sh.it.just.works and Lemmy.world both loved to try and act like I was out of line for calling for open carry the other night. Unfortunately California state law doesn’t allow for it. I think that it’s the only way to get them to back off with the Marines, the National Guard and with ICE though. If they’re not going to be afraid of us then they’re never going to change and the people saying “don’t give them a reason to escalate” will keep saying that up to the first battles at which point they’ll run and cower.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

Fun fact, the real wave of gun restrictions started with the Black Panthers open carrying in California back in in the 60s.

https://www.history.com/articles/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act

That led to the Mulford Act:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

I hope Newsom puts forward legislation to eliminate the Mulford Act. That would give the Neoconfederates serious pause.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago

The state law made by fucking Reagan and should thusly be ignored.

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Completely agree. We should have gotten rid of the law. It was born out of racism and restricts our rights in Cali.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Jury nullification, baby. Just make sure you're headed in front of your peers and not getting dumped into a concentration camp in El Salvador.

[-] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You're not wrong but you're on the wrong instance if your solution isn't just 'hold hands and vote for black trump with a d next to their name next election'.

[-] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago
[-] 0ndead@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago
[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago

Uncomfortable truth: violence has solved some of the largest issues across the history of humanity.

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

yeah its also created some of the biggest problems

all wars, all genocides ect, that's pretty bad stuff

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Violence didn’t create war or genocide, those are a result of nationalism and racism, respectively. Violence is the means used to accomplish the goal, but the motivation is what does the creating.

To be clear I’m not pro-violence or something, but it is kinda funny to me when you hear “violence is the answer” and open a history book to see time and time again that violence is the answer for quite a few problems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dinren@discuss.online 21 points 1 week ago

Your apathy is even less helpful.

[-] 0ndead@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago
[-] tonytins@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago

I'd prefer to not give Trump a reason to use the Insurrection Act.

[-] SnotFlickerman 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm not pro-starting-the-shooting either but let's be real, he will find an excuse to use it whether people fight back or not.

We can stop pretending he has any restraint we aren't even six months in.

[-] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Tell me how every dictatorship has been overthrown. I’ll give you a hint: those that chastize calls for retaliation tend to be labeled “fascist sympathizers” by history.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
725 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24209 readers
2430 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS