717
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
717 points (100.0% liked)
politics
23387 readers
3078 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lol, as if Harvard were liberal
they're infamously, thuggishly conservative
By Nazi standards, conservatives are too far left.
And North Korea is obviously democratic!
Oh, wait, no that's fucking retarded.
Nazis were not socialist lmao
https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/the-origin-of-the-term-nazi.html
Yeah dude, we know what the word means.
Literally the next sentence from your source:
Emphasis mine.
Yes is the article written in present day, but I'm saying they called themselves socialists not that they aren't right. Nazi politics are not easily put on the left-right spectrum. Which is why I say conservatism and nationalism is usually right
Socialists (and trade unionists and yes, communists) were among the first groups the Nazis targeted.
Hitler hated that term but the party was already formed. Put the emphasis on the National part of national socialism.
Socialism was also popular at the time and they were using that to increase their appeal.
They hated socialists and beat them up in the streets.
Yep. Hitler also hated Christianity IIRC, but allied with the church for their financial aid and the support of religious voters. They definitely weren't above using the name of something that they hated and actively attacked to allow them to grab more power, and it makes them neither socialist nor Christian to have done so.
Seriously? They didn't start street brawls with the church and kill them. They did that with socialists. There was no teaming up, there was no alliance, there was no marketing trick. You're making up revisionist history and you seriously need to learn what happened and stop spreading misinformation.
Which wing of parliament did the NSDAP sit on, the right or the left?
If we're gonna play bullshit word games, at least sitting on the right is relevant to the original definition of right wing.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/29/greenes-ahistorical-claim-that-nazis-were-socialists/
They called themselves socialists, the word changed meaning over time so you might argue they wouldn't be considered socialists right now, but they sure as hell were considered socialists then. From the same source:
The word socialist very much had a very well established meaning at that point (definitely more established than it currently is in the US).
Everything you're saying is ahistorical. Why aren't you at all interested in the reality of what happened?
It's not that the meaning of "socialist" changed but that the Nazis were never actually socialist despite their deliberately misleading name, and Hitler had anyone in the party with any socialist tendencies killed off. You seem not to be hearing what everyone in the thread is trying to say to you. The Nazis were straightforwardly fascist, far right, and never anything to do with socialism or the left.
This is a fascinating conversation to follow. The Nazi's absolutely were not left nor socialist, but there might be a history class difference. American hatred of socialism is soo deep and history textbooks are so useless (since most are made in Texas and cater to those politics) I remember a HUGE emphasis on Nazi being National Socialist and another example of why socialism never worked. It starts early here man. I think we're seeing a lot of the effects these days.
Wow, I have come across this inaccurate talking point from right-wingers on many occasions, but I never realized that Americans were being taught these lies in school. Well, we are really seeing the effects of all this propaganda now the fascists are in power.
It is especially bad in the deep-red states. The Tulsa race riots are still often lied about in Oklahoma depending on the school. Basically they said, "it worked on Native American history, so just do that for everything we don't agree with."
Right, the Nazis were socialist in the same way North Korea is democratic.
They appropriated the term "socialist" as a marketing mechanism.
A couple of articles debunking the claim that Nazis were socialist:
No, the Nazis Were Not Socialists
Were the Nazis socialists?
It was in the name of the party, north-korea's official name is Democratic People's Republic of Korea it happens more often that countries and parties choose a name that's not representative for what they really are
Aye. "Democratic Republic."
I see plenty of people covered the whole nazis =/= socialist thing already, so I'll abstain there. I didn't see anyone mentioning that left-wing nationalism CAN be (but usually isn't) a thing too. Nationalism is not inherently a conservative thing. Vietnamese nationalism would be a form of left-wing nationalism - pretty much for them, just the idea that the Vietnamese people should be the ones in charge of Vietnam, not some other country.
That sounds more like self-determinism than nationalism.
This is exactly why they complain about liberalism and just added another slimy definition. (Not left, but looks like people pointed that out already.)
American conservatives are supposed to be liberals, as in people that believe in ideological liberalism.
If someone tells you they hate liberals and socialists, believe them, and recognize what that means they are.