393
submitted 1 year ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

88 million didn’t vote at all

Sorry. I asked for a ballot with a non-genocidal name on the ticket and was told I needed to leave the building.

Friend tried to vote, but she didn't have a DL yet (chronic Metro rider) and her student card didn't count as a valid Real ID.

Mom voted in a suburb that was gerrymandered 55/45 Republican a few years earlier. She got to vote by mail because she was a senior citizen. But nobody younger than her has that privilege anymore.

Then there was the woman who issued a provisional ballot because she was out on parole and wasn't sure if she could legally vote again. Police arrested her for it.

Maybe there's a reason turnout has been falling that goes farther than "people had a case of the stupids suddenly".

[-] Steve@startrek.website 24 points 1 year ago

You were told not to vote as part of a campaign to get liberal voters to stay home. You fell for it.

[-] hildegarde 9 points 1 year ago

It was a campaign to stop a genocide. Harris chose to throw her campaign instead of winning votes.

[-] Soulg@ani.social 11 points 1 year ago

You chose to make the genocide escalate dramatically. You cut off Gazans noses to spite Harris' face.

[-] hildegarde 2 points 1 year ago

i don't work for the state department

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Can't be reiterated how many times Harris attacked her own base and ate away at the coalition Biden had used to win four years early.

But it's never the politician's fault for alienating the voters. It's always those stupid disloyal single-issue anti-genocide voters.

[-] Soulg@ani.social 15 points 1 year ago

It's both of your faults. Multiple things can be true at once; such as correctly understanding that genocide is bad while also simultaneously being too fucking stupid to vote against the obvious fascist.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It’s both of your faults

Why is a random person on the Internet held to the same level of culpability as a sitting executive branch official?

[-] piefood@feddit.online 3 points 1 year ago

I always find it amazing that people want to blame those that couldn't stomach to vote for genocide. Instead of blaming the ones with the money, the power, and the platform that chose to hand the election to Trump in order to keep supporting genocide.

[-] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

You ever get that speech on a plane about putting on your own oxygen mask before helping others?

[-] piefood@feddit.online 1 points 1 year ago

I sure have. I'm not sure how that's relevant to the conversation.

[-] cybersin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The Democratic party was told not to run disastrously unpopular candidates, they did so anyways, then blamed the electorate for their defeat.

Seems like you fell for it.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Sorry. I asked for a ballot with a non-genocidal name on the ticket and was told I needed to leave the building.

Man, you showed them, trump has been great for gaza.... how's it been working out for you?

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

Here's the thing though, the genocide was bipartisan. Voting literally didn't affect it. Also this hold hold your nose strategy doesn't seem like it actually works. Just straight up does not win elections and shame and voters isn't working. You should change up your tactics on the off chance we ever have elections again

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

the genocide was bipartisan

Liberals don't want to hear it. They refuse to believe their side was involved in the bloodshed.

They'll heckle you and downvote and call you a Russian bot for speaking any kind of truth on the Dems' enthusiastic participation in the Holocaust.

It's like trying to talk to a Catholic about the Nazis or the priest sex scandal. They will not listen.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Lol so you thought that trump would be better? Man you really showed everyone.... I'm sure Gaza is all "thank Allah they didn't vote in genocide joe again, it's so much better with trump"

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Lol

I keep seeing this response to a conversation about genocide

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yea because you idiots decided to protest vote in a literal nazi... who cranked up the genocide on gaza to 11....but somehow you still seem to think this was the smart thing to do.

[-] piefood@feddit.online 3 points 1 year ago

Which 3rd party voter said that Trump would be better? I don't think I've ever seen them say that.

I've only heard liberals who apparently are in support of genocide say that.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This election was not a "protest" vote election. This was a vote dem or get fascist who cannot give a single fuck about gaza...

[-] piefood@feddit.online 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, which is why we loudly told the dem to stop running an unpopular campaign. It seems like she decided helping out with a genocide was more important than winning the election

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And congrats you helped crank the genocide to 11...way to take the moral high ground. I'm sure everyone in gaza is just so happy to have trump in power.

[-] piefood@feddit.online 1 points 1 year ago

And congrats on voting for genocide. I'm sure that everyone in the US who is losing their rights are happy that your party chose genocide, over winning what should have been an easy election.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Lol yea cause me voting for dems was a vote for genocide.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

No, it's just that many people understandably have mass murdering millions of civilians as a red line. Like, if that's not a dealbreaker in a candidate, what is?

[-] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Fascism. In a first past the post electoral system, a non vote is a vote for the opposition.

[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You were fine with fascism abroad. It's only domestic fascism you have an issue with. Typical liberalism.

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 year ago

Maybe there's a reason turnout has been falling that goes farther than "people had a case of the stupids suddenly".

Sorry. I asked for a ballot with a non-genocidal name on the ticket and was told I needed to leave the building.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] FarmTaco@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Sorry. I asked for a ballot with a non-genocidal name on the ticket and was told I needed to leave the building.

wonder how thats working out for your ideals.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Great for them.

Everything's worse but at least they still get to feel smug. #winning

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

There's also the retraction of mail-in voting from 2020. That may actually be the major difference between 2020 and 2024

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
393 points (100.0% liked)

News

37727 readers
1075 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS