653
submitted 3 months ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/technology@lemmy.world

We’ve been anticipating it for years, and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the extension will soon no longer be available because it “doesn’t follow the best practices for Chrome extensions”.

Now that it is finally happening, many seem to be oddly resigned to the idea that Google is taking away the best and most powerful ad content blocker available on any web browser today, with one article recommending people set up a DNS based content blocker on their network 😒 – instead of more obvious solutions.

I may not have blogged about this but I recently read an article from 1999 about why Gopher lost out to the Web, where Christopher Lee discusses the importance of the then-novel term “mind share” and how it played an important part in dictating why the web won out. In my last post, I touched on the importance of good information to democracies – the same applies to markets (including the browser market) – and it seems to me that we aren’t getting good information about this topic.

This post is me trying to give you that information, to help increase the mind share of an actual alternative. Enjoy!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] underthesign@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

Firefox needs to work on ensuring seamless compatibility with more websites, web apps and so on, because I'm personally very bored with my kids' schools and related services sending out emails and forms with links that simply won't open in FF but are clearly expecting Chrome or Edge where they work fine. Yes, this is on the lazy developers, but if FF want wider scale take-up outside of geeky niche groups then this is the stuff they must fix.

[-] gerbler@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago

I've said it before and I'll say it again. If your site doesn't work on Firefox your site doesn't work. As web developers your job is to develop applications for the web not for one specific browser. This goes double for essential services.

[-] Marx2k@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago

My job requires login to most internal websites via Microsoft Azure AD SSO using Kerberos authentication using passwordless, smart card auth.

This switch happened this week. Up until yesterday I was 100% Firefox until this.

Firefox for MacOS is not able to do this. I spent an hour or so looking for solutions. Chrome on MacOS also doesn't. Safari does and now I have to fucking use Safari FFS.

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Could be worse. You could have to use Chrome.

[-] Marx2k@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

I read this in my history and for a second thought it was in response to my other comment, which also is true

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/14163106

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago

Internet Explorer has entered the chat.

[-] MintyPhoenix@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Check some of Firefox's about:config flags. A number of years ago I enabled something related to Kerberos for my previous company's (simpler) Microsoft SSO on a Mac, it may still be available and enough to work for you.

[-] Marx2k@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

I did. Unfortunately for the Mac it's a no-go. It was a good 10 year run :(

[-] FitzTheBastard@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[-] Marx2k@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago
[-] FitzTheBastard@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Just tryna save you from the failed abortion that is Safari

[-] Rykzon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 months ago

Doesn't really matter to a regular user, in that case it's"Firefox doesn't work"

[-] figaro@lemdro.id 6 points 3 months ago

"ugh just use a normal browser"

  • everyone
[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's some BS. You and i both know that Chromium has the largest share in the browser business, so it makes sense from a development perspective to develop websites that will reach the most people. It's on Firefox to optimise their browser so that it can run these sites as well.

[-] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

A single company shouldn't be able to dictate how the web works.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 3 months ago

But they said they wouldn't be evil!

[-] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Shit. You got me there. Carry on I guess.

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Well too bad, because that's how things are

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago
[-] Exatron@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Wrong again, sparky.

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 months ago

On the same line of thought, we should remove sidewalks and bike lanes because cars use the road more

[-] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's a pretty crooked line of thought

[-] onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

line

I see what you did there...

[-] sibachian@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

firefox uses the standard, chrome are adding some non-standard crap to be anti-competitive. same shit microsoft did with internet explorer and caused it to eventually be replaced by chrome waybackwhen once law finally told them to back off.

it's not up to firefox, it's up to the law to step in and prevent google from doing anti-competitive non-standard shit.

[-] yoasif@fedia.io 25 points 3 months ago

Firefox can't fix all the broken sites in the world, but they do investigate issues reported to https://webcompat.com

You can help by reporting sites that don't work for you.

[-] fxdave@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 months ago

Slack calls disabled for firefox users, but if you change the user agent to chrome it works...

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 11 points 3 months ago

Almost like it does work on Firefox but for some reason they don't want you using it. Honestly it's so damn weird, why do that? Is there some incentive for them?

[-] tehmics@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Okay that's fine, but when websites are effectively writing

if user_agent_string != [chromium]
     break;

It doesn't really matter how good compatibility is. I've had websites go from nothing but a "Firefox is not supported, please use Chrome" splash screen to working just fine with Firefox by simply spoofing the user agent to Chrome. Maybe some feature was broken, but I was able to do what I needed. More often than not they just aren't testing it and don't want to support other browsers.

The more insidious side of this is that websites will require and attempt to enforce Chrome as adblocking gets increasingly impossible on them, because it aligns with their interests. It's so important for the future of the web that we resist this change, but I think it's too late.

The world wide web is quickly turning into the dark alley of the internet that nobody is willing to walk down.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I can't think of a single example where a web page doesn't work on FF.

if FF want wider scale take-up outside of geeky niche groups

Lol. I remember when FF was the most popular browser.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

I just need a „install as app“ Feature in Firefox, that is not as pain as the webapp Manager app we currently have

[-] kava@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

What do you mean "install as app"?

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Install PWA so that you can start those as normal native apps without it looking like a website in a browser (remove unnecessary window decorations) and cache js for ever, so that the PWA can be used offline, if features are not dependant on API calls

[-] XaiwahBlue 2 points 3 months ago

On mobile it's the three dots then the install button that has an image of a cellphone?

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I guess, I only know the way on iPhone using “add to homescreen”

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

There was a point in time where Firefox had the most market share? When was this?

[-] kava@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Around 2009~2011 if I remember correctly. Back then it was either IE or FF. Then Chrome came on the scene with their fancy marketing ads and blew up very quickly to overtake FF.

At the time FF felt bloated compared to Chrome, so Chrome was like the fresh new and faster alternative.

[-] menemen@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Can you send me an example? I don't think I ever really encountered those sites and I use FF almost exclusively for ~20 years.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 3 months ago

Yeah, unfortunately the next step will be sites rejecting "unsecure" browsers because they want the ad money.

This is going to get worse, not better.

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

Firefox needs to work on ensuring seamless compatibility with more websites, web apps and so on

Care to share some examples Firefox has trouble with? The only issues I have with websites is due to my aggressive use of Noscript.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There's some streaming video sites that deliberately block Firefox. It used to be that Firefox didn't support the necessary web standards, but now it does. The site put up blocks telling you to use Chrome, and never got around to taking them down.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I'm on a Surface Pro, which is a somewhat weaker device. For whatever reason, Microsoft Edge (Chromium) runs YouTube and Twitch much better than Firefox. This might be due to efficiency in the browser, or the site video code itself being built for it.

[-] jinarched@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

What to do when the site is not compatible with Firefox: Alt + ←

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago

It's pretty trivial to just use an alternate browser for the garbage sites that don't support FF.

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 1 points 3 months ago

If I create a blank HTML file, every single web browser will open it perfectly fine. If I add browser-specific things that firefox doesn't have, it is my responsibility to create an alternative that keeps the site working. A user shouldn't have to switch browsers due to incompetence of webdevs.

[-] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I just want my modern codecs to function. Why can't I play .mov or h264??

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
653 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

61346 readers
3606 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS