960
submitted 7 months ago by fpslem@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Bumbling US cops who raided a medical diagnostics center thinking it was a cannabis farm got a gun stuck to the powerful magnets of an MRI machine, a California lawsuit has alleged.

The owners of the facility are claiming damages against the Los Angeles Police Department for an operation their lawyers describe as "nothing short of a disorganized circus."

Their lawsuit details how a SWAT team swarmed Noho Diagnostic Center after the squad's leader persuaded a magistrate to issue a search warrant.

Officer Kenneth Franco drew on his "twelve hours of narcotics training" and discovered the facility was using more electricity than nearby stores, the lawsuit said.

"Officer Franco, therefore, concluded (the facility) was cultivating cannabis, disregarding the fact that it is a diagnostic facility utilizing an MRI machine, X-ray machine and other heavy medical equipment -- unlike the surrounding businesses selling flowers, chocolates and children's merchandise," the suit said.

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 363 points 7 months ago

It gets worse:

Instead of seeking expert advice on how to retrieve the weapon, one officer decided to activate the emergency shutdown button.

"This action caused the MRI's magnet to rapidly lose superconductivity, leading to the evaporation of approximately 2,000 liters of helium gas and resulting in extensive damage to the MRI machine," the suit said.

The officer then retrieved his gun, but left a magazine full of bullets on the floor of the MRI office, the suit says.

[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 212 points 7 months ago

When you're never, ever, punished, eh who gives a fuck

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 107 points 7 months ago

Exactly, the city is going to be on the hook for this, at worst he'll get a talking to by the chief.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 71 points 7 months ago

I hope there are security tapes.

[-] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

TBF, If I saw a big red button labeled stop, I would have pressed it in that scenario, most emergency stops don’t destroy the entire system.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 111 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You would have pressed it to retrieve a personal item? Seriously? Like if you're visiting a factory and your phone fell on the assembly floor you would run to the first red button you could find and press it without asking anyone? If so, please never get on an airplane.

[-] parody@lemmings.world 27 points 7 months ago

I’m wondering the timeframe. Did the gun SWOOSH out of his hand and then he slammed the button right in front of him worried the gun was going to explode or something?

What’s unforgivable is cops in LOS ANGELES even using one penny of taxpayer dollars to even think about cannabis. I guess they’re protecting state coffers - illegal buds = no tax revenue.

I’d want them to respond to complaints about growers near schools or something… and try to be proactive I suppose if a residential neighborhood reeks…

But reviewing all business power consumption and going on fishing expeditions WTF?! In LA?!?

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

Like my redneck ass town wouldnt consider that enough due to the amount of folks qith home machine shops and specialist equipment. But somehow LA isn't supposed to have that.

[-] Lepsea@sh.itjust.works 43 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If it was me, i would ask the people there how to retrieve my stuff.... I might get into trouble but hey in this scenario im a police who lose their gun to MRI machine so I'll look stupid either way

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

The people there were probably handcuffed on the floor and not in a mood to help.

[-] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

With the benefit of hindsight we all would.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

Also, the benefit of common fucking sense to ask the professionals before just hitting an emergency button when there's no immediate danger.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 32 points 7 months ago

The ones I'm familiar with don't say stop on them and they have a plastic guard over them to make you be really sure you want to hit it. It also causes damage to our tools (giant electron microscopes) because it has to make itself safe instantly, which means neutralized a lot of electricity, various gasses, and mechanical parts in an instant.

[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 19 points 7 months ago

But it's also not unusual that E-Stops can cause severe damage to a machine when used. After all, such switches are meant to instantaneously bring everything to a screeching halt for safety reasons without worrying about the machine.

And in this case, the E-Stop is meant to prevent the MRI from exploding and sending pieces of shrapnel flying everywhere. MRI machines can be quite dangerous in operation.

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

MRI machines don't explode and send shrapnel everywhere lmao.

The quench button is used if a person is pinned by a ferrous object, or if there's a large fire in the room and firefighters need to get in the room.

The electrical E-stop button is used if the equipment is on fire, or if there's flooding.

[-] homicidalrobot@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago

MRI machines do explode and send shrapnel everywhere. Emergency stopping them causes the helium that's trapped in the part that rotates the magnets to become a gas, then expand as the magnets superheat. In some cases, this causes an understandable explosion.

Seriously happened once already this year https://healthimaging.com/topics/medical-imaging/magnetic-resonance-imaging-mri/mri-explosion-leaves-3-injured-including-2-hospital-staffers , the cop is lucky.

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

the part that makes the magnets rotate

The magnet doesn't rotate like a CT. But you're right that there is a vessel with supercooled helium.

But that's the first time i've ever heard of this... It's a philips, makes sense.

They're supposed to be designed such that it is impossible. Looks like there was a major recall. Because again, that's something that should never happen.

[-] Remoed@lemmings.world 2 points 7 months ago

I agree, imagine if you were just sitting around figuring out what to do and the gun went off in the MRI possibly killing someone. The mistake was entry in the first place, not this

[-] hate2bme@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Not sure why you are downvoted. I think a rifle getting pulled into an MRI machine is as good a reason as any to hit the big red button.

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

California still has a 10 round magazine capacity limit for ordinary private ownership, I believe. (Last I heard the ruling striking it down was stayed).

So, did this cop negligently just leave a super illegal thing (by California legal standards) on the floor for some medical technician to eventually pick up and get legally slapped for?

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago

a magazine full of bullets

I know this is just the reporter's ignorance, but I'm imagining a magazine full of bullets, no cases, powder, or ever primers.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 47 points 7 months ago

I don't know about anyone else, but comments like this make me want to use firearms terminology incorrectly on purpose.

[-] hate2bme@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Even gun guys don't think like this.

[-] Arcka@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

Sure they do. The gun clubs I've joined foster an environment that attracts people who demonstrate care and consideration in all aspects concerning firearms. If someone is lazy and imprecise in the manner in which they communicate about guns, that might also apply to their general demeaner. After speaking with some of these fellows during public range days, it's not surprising when later they're shooting holes in the shelter roof or bouncing ricochets off the top of the berm.

[-] hate2bme@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

You misunderstood what I was talking about. I am saying if a non gun person says bullets they know exactly what they are talking about about and don't feel a need to correct them. No need to be an asshole and say "Well ackshully". Nobody likes that guy.

[-] Arcka@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago

No misunderstanding - I get what you're saying and I disagree.

I also don't agree that expecting journalists to be accurate makes someone an asshole. If they were reporting on an automobile and wrote that the spark plugs make 500HP we could guess what they likely meant, but we'd also recognize the journalist's ignorance. They should educate themselves on their subject matter so they can do their job properly.

[-] Dave2 22 points 7 months ago

Forgive my ignorance but isn't a bullet made up by those things? Why would they need to mention the components of the bullet for it to make sense?

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago

The word they were looking for is "cartridges".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartridge_(firearms)

[-] lengau@midwest.social 6 points 7 months ago

Yeah, it was an issue of Gun Lovers Monthly

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

Are you going to write a correction letter to the editor?

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I get the feeling he was trying to get clear so he could deny he did it.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
960 points (100.0% liked)

News

29075 readers
3959 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS