710
submitted 2 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Hopefully the mods are okay with a little journalism about journalism so that people know where Politico stands in terms of being a trustworthy source.

The headline in question:

‘Next question’: Harris evades questions about her identity

The background to the headline is from Harris' recent CNN interview:

“I want to ask you about your opponent, Donald Trump,” Bash said to Harris. “I was a little bit surprised. People might be surprised to hear that you have never interacted with him, met him face-to-face. That’s gonna change soon. But what I wanna ask you about is what he said last month. He suggested that you ‘happened’ to turn Black recently for political purposes, questioning a core part of your identity.”

“Same old, tired playbook,” Harris replied. “Next question, please.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 163 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honest question from a European: Do you guys still have journalism somewhere? It all seems to be political propaganda or outrage clickbait with you guys.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 144 points 2 months ago

Point of order from an American: Politico is a wholly owned subsidiary of German multinational Axel Springer.

[-] ceiphas@lemmy.world 74 points 2 months ago

Didn't know that (i'm German), but Springer ist known in Germany to outright lie to push rightwing agenda

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Better regulation in EU and Germany. And better freedom of speech too.
Many Americans confuse the right to lie with freedom of speech.

[-] paw@feddit.org 12 points 2 months ago

Touché (I'm German, btw)

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Do they own Spiegel?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 94 points 2 months ago

Very little, but there is NPR, which generally attempts to do real journalism.

https://www.npr.org/

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 49 points 2 months ago
[-] protist@mander.xyz 34 points 2 months ago

ProPublica, PBS, and don't forget the Daily Show

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I wouldn't say the Daily Show does real journalism. They do make important stories public, but they have a clear slant both in terms of politics and in terms of making it funny.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Jon Stewart would agree. Not sure if Norm would, but probably.

[-] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Daily Show and Last Week Tonight have staffs of ardent pursuers of truth.

A lot of study & journalism goes in to the jokes & it shows.

Both offer a succinct wrap of the daily (or weekly) news.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Study and research, definitely. But I still wouldn't call it journalism. It's satire based on research. When going for a joke over necessary details, they will often go for the joke. And if you read the story elsewhere, you will see that something important has been left out because of it.

I love The Daily Show and Last Week Tonight a long with A Closer Look on Seth Myers' show and I regularly watch all of them, but I still wouldn't call them journalism. It's well-researched extremely topical comedy. And that's fine. That's a good thing. People can get their information from comedy too. It's just that you shouldn't necessarily turn to them for a full picture of a story.

That said, I would say that's much less true of Last Week Tonight because they go in depth into a subject. The Daily Show and A Closer Look spend at most 6 or 7 minutes on a subject and have to fit in a lot of jokes.

[-] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

And that's why I (& sounds like you, too) watch them: as you said they bring valid topics to the table. If they're skewing the facts severely, they make it pretty obviously part(y) of the jokes. Doonesbury was always more of a news media than national inquirer.

Comedy delivered from a proper court jester beats the telltale gossip rag for actual useful information every day of the week.

That in mind, Late night, Tonight shows, daily shows all do a better job of delivering news than Fox.

Plus, they tell you it's only part of the story or give multiple takes on the situations.

Fox, not so much. Some experts agree... Valid topics are only those approved by Sun times & RT.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I don't disagree with anything you're saying. I'm just saying it isn't journalism. It's informational, helpful and sometimes even profound- but it isn't journalism. It's just not journalism when you sacrifice information for humor.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Mother Jones remains my favorite publication, I think.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Which is precisely why Musk has flagged it as possible misinformation on Xitter.

[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Agree, though their coverage of Bernie's 2016 presidential run towed the DNC party line, which made me less sure about their neutrality. Now I tend to hit up the BBC if I want US news coverage and I don't have time to ingest multiple sources.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

A lot of British people can tell you all about the BBC's toeing the government line. But both are a lot less biased than many other Western media sources. NPR's biggest problem is similar to what the NYT and WaPo do, just to a lesser extent- overcompensating and causing an imbalance toward conservatism in an attempt to look unbiased. WaPo and especially the NYT are far worse though.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 months ago
[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Local affiliates and independent papers tend to be much better.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

Until they get bought up by Sinclair or Gannett.

[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

This is extremely dangerous to our democracy

[-] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

"This is dangerous to our democracy."

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Was gonna say, "they still exist?" Lol

[-] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

There are a lot of 'content creators' that pose as journalists.

There are journalists that do great work but since their stories can run counter to a narrative, it can be more difficult to find those articles.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

Specifically, "Good Work" and "Some More News" spring to mind as producing well researched pieces - they're both highly specialized and only deliver occasional focused news rather than a continuous spread of general goings-on... but given how many outlets are happy to spam low quality continuous bullshit I consider that a good thing.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

This is the culmination of unchecked capitalism having full control of the media. The truth hasn’t mattered for a really long time – only which words are most profitable.

[-] casmael@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Related question: what do you guys think of the associated press?

[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

American here: their goal is clearly factual reporting, and I don't see too often where they've missed the mark. Nobody's free of bias, but they're pretty good at balancing theirs out.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

We have it less and less too here in the EU.

IMO.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

We have capitalism that is regulated less and less with every Repub admin, so no, unfortunately.

[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

Drop Site news, 404 media, Pro Publica, Vox is occasionally good.

Short answer is “not much.”

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

I just had an article removed today from Drop Site news because it had been posted on their Substack. :/

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Most of our real journalism lives online or is parroted from foreign journalists

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

This is your future if you can't stop the liberals.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago

Liberals... Those who want liberty

[-] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

They are a known troll. Just keep that in mind if you continue to engage with them

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

thanks for the info

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Liberty for whom?

The rich, the powerful, the Elect. They want the freedom to own and control anything, even the truth. The """Liberty""" they seek is total privatization of everything, and journalism is part of that.

Politico's bullshit is your liberty. You're free to be lied to by anyone you want!

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Hey, remember when you said you'd vote if Biden was replaced? Good times. How's that going?

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I get most of my news from Reuters (which is UK-based I think). I used to read NPR but I think Reuters has more quality content. Beyond that, the Associated Press I guess, and that's all I really trust.

The Onion too, for when I need to forget how fucked we all are as a species.

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
710 points (100.0% liked)

News

23353 readers
2740 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS