[-] paw@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago

European here. Is this actually true that waffle houses can get violent? If so, is there any explanation? I like waffles and never associated them with violence. Never been to a waffle house, though.

[-] paw@feddit.org 12 points 3 weeks ago

Touché (I'm German, btw)

[-] paw@feddit.org 24 points 3 weeks ago

My understanding of the whole "being beneficial for humanity" is that:

  1. It's kind of a meme that you need to have as a silicon valley start-up. Like Google's niw dropped "don't be evil".
  2. If the founders and the investors, the share holder, get rich or richer, then this is already beneficial to humanity. In a net positive way similar to trickle-down-economics. At least thatvis what I think their line of thinking is.

Having said that, I think LLMs or Machine Learning can be used for useful things but I also think - as stated - the message " being beneficial for humanity" is hollow in a broader sense.

[-] paw@feddit.org 15 points 3 weeks ago

I find Zig a language wuth very good WASM support out of the box and it is mostly imperative in nature.

It is currently pre 1.0 and has some rough edges.

[-] paw@feddit.org 18 points 3 weeks ago

And I was always taught that capitalism allocates the resources ideally. /s

[-] paw@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago

Neovim maybe? 😉

[-] paw@feddit.org 42 points 1 month ago

I wonder if I'll see it say "from lemmy" someday?

That's the spirit!

[-] paw@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago

The "basic" strategy for RoW is, imho, to upgrade it so much that you find your endgame equipment with it. Thus means upgdraded Tier-5 weapon and upgraded plate armor. To clarify: you find these items already upgraded. You also should hoard some scroll of transmutations because you then transmute the RoW when you no longer need it. The upgrades of the RoW scales similar as with weapons or armor. This means as wutg weapons that +1 reduces the strength requirement and then +3 again, as +6. This means the upgrades that are interesting for an RoW are +1, +3, +6, +10, +15, +22. Each if these levels may yield upgraded weapons or armor. As far as I remember (and it may have changed) a +1 RoW can drop +1 equipment, a +3 RoW can drop +2, a +6 can drop +3.

Let's assume you upgrade to +10. this should eventually drop +4 weapon and +4 plate armor and then still having +5 SoUs left to either upgrade tge weapon, the plate armor, another ring (+4 rings could drop as well). Just to finalize tbe example: We use the 5 SoUs to upgrade the weapon, then our final equipment is: +9 weapon, +4 plate (maybe the smith can upgrads to +5) and a +10 ring, that was the RoW before transmuted. This is a good enough equipment in my opinion.

So, tl;dr: +6 or +10 is what I would do. +15 for the fun of it.

A final reminder: The equipment still needs to drop, which is random. So you may just die before anything useful drops. And you need a lot of Scrolls of Curse Removal, since you usually fund a lot of stuff.

[-] paw@feddit.org 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is an old paper that it explains the basics: https://www.eecs.umich.edu/courses/eecs588/static/stack_smashing.pdf

Today there are a lot of mitigations where the steps of the paper don't work anymore, but the general ideas should be still valid. I'll hope you find the example you are looking for in there.

On another note: What is your intention? And can I participate 😈

[-] paw@feddit.org 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The crowdstrike f*-up is so bad it travels back in time. That's my best guess

[-] paw@feddit.org 14 points 2 months ago

You are still reliant on the models trained by these companies. This training is very expensive. And yes there are ioen source models exist (thank god) but there are also closed source models that are very successfully advertised.

And self hosting requires money and skill. This means there is a lot of people who lack both and may then use closed source models.

[-] paw@feddit.org 30 points 2 months ago

First of all it concentrates power and wealth on the owners of the models (Microsoft, OpenAI) or the ones that provide the tools (Nvidia).

Yes, there is truth in it, that people who couldn't afford to pay someone to create art, or get consulting, can get this now to a certain extend (if they can afford internet access and pay the AI services they need). But this comes also at the price of lowering the income of the people who provided these services. They now need to compete in the business creation market and not in the market that they trained for. Not everyone can create and maintain a business with or without starting money, just from a skill point of view. Nor does everybody want to.

view more: next ›

paw

joined 2 months ago