[-] tty5@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago

Historical definition of decimated: reduce by 10%. Not to 10%.

Modern definition: reduce by significant amount.

[-] tty5@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

There should be calls to toss him into a volcano and they should be getting serious traction

[-] tty5@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

She'd lose battle of wits against a stuffed iguana. She's essentially unarmed

[-] tty5@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

This. I bought 500 feather blades for $40 (which is more of a steal than a deal) in 2013 and they will last me many more years

[-] tty5@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

I'll be really surprised if arm manages to get 10% by then

[-] tty5@lemmy.world 55 points 6 months ago

Yes. PSN is only available in about 70 countries (out of 190). E.g. in the entire continent of Africa only one country has access.

Even some members of European Union don't get PSN.

[-] tty5@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago

I've had a company require employees to install MDM on personal phones (remote control/management) to be allowed to use them for 2fa app or email access.. there was a surprised Pikachu when I refused. Eventually they issued me a company phone, because it was impossible to do most tasks without 2fa. That device was on 9 to 5 only.

[-] tty5@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

Netflix limits you to 720p even on windows, unless you are using Edge: https://help.netflix.com/en/node/23742 (expand HTML5 browsers and scroll down).

This limitation doesn't apply to all content - it's the worst case scenario if copyright holder really put their foot down.

[-] tty5@lemmy.world 225 points 11 months ago

I don't see how an email that has no proof of delivery (could have ended in spam for example) would be legally binding.

Accepting a ToS update simply by virtue of no action is also questionable unless provisions permitting that were in the ToS you've accepted and even then it would not work in the European Union, because that's listed in the forbidden clauses registry.

[-] tty5@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In some places such tests are recommended if not mandatory for all controlled substances, even if their potential for abuse is minimal - vyvanse is an amphetamine precursor, so it's classified like that. It's a class above antidepressants for example - more tightly controlled.

I've had to submit to a drug test on most refills and I've had it explained using the exact same wording, so I suspect that was a standard script he was following (in Ontario). There was even a difference when getting the pills because of their legal status: pharmacy was allowed to courier antidepressants for another family member, while vyvanse was in person pickup only from the same pharmacy.

Also AFAIK Vyvanse can have a nasty interaction with meth.

tl;dr; this is likely a standard procedure they use for all controlled substances

Edit: I just remembered my doctor showed me he literally had a checkbox in their filing system to confirm a drug test and it only showed up when a controlled substance was prescribed.

[-] tty5@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Now make a $12,000 version with door locks and a basic AC and I'll buy one this week. I miss 4th/5th gen Hilux

[-] tty5@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Space jews, you know the ones with lasers causing wildfires

view more: next ›

tty5

joined 1 year ago