Even if it is damaged or broken, you'd be able to return it for the full price, because you did not get what you were promised (at least in countries with legal warranty)
If you actually calculate the maximum speed at which information can travel before causing paradoxes, in some situations it could safely exceed c.
For two observers who are not in motion relative to each other, information could be transmitted instantly, regardless of the distance, without causing a paradox.
The faster the observers are traveling relatively to each other, the slower information would have to travel to avoid causing paradoxes.
More interestingly, this maximum paradox-free speed correlates with the time and space dilation caused by the observers' motion.
From your own reference frame, another person is moving at a speed of v*c. The maximum speed at which you could send a message to that observer, without causing a paradox, looks something like c/sqrt(v) (very simplified).
Sure, it'd be a solution for five minutes until someone delids the secure enclave on the gaming card, extracts the keys, and builds their own open source hw alternative.
High-performance FPGAs are actually relatively cheap if you take apart broken elgato/bmd capture cards, just a pain in the butt to reball and solder them. But possibly the cheapest way to be able to emulate any chip you could want.
Das gibt weniger Fußgänger die durch Radfahrer verletzt werden als Fußgänger die über lose Gehwegplatten stolpern und sterben. Ja, es gibt Einzelfälle, aber die sind absolut zu vernachlässigen.
Ich selber fahre aus Prinzip nie auf dem Fußweg, aber damit bin ich halt alleine. Wenn ich in ner Gruppe unterwegs bin weigern sich die anderen aus Angst auf der Straße zu fahren und wollen entweder auf dem Fußweg oder gleich mit dem Auto fahren. Und ich kann von niemandem verlangen sich in Lebensgefahr zu begeben.
Die Polizei weigert sich, die Anzeigen anzunehmen, weil die Realität keine Fahrschule sei und ich nicht erwarten könne, dass Autofahrer die Regeln wortwörtlich nehmen wenn sie's eilig haben. Und so werde ich trotz Zeichen 277.1 an einer Baustelle bei jeder Vorbeifahrt ein dutzend Mal so dicht überholt, dass ich jedes Mal in den Bauzaun abgedrängt werde, und ich kann weiter nix machen außer zu zählen.
Weil man 90% der Straße eh schon den Autos gegeben hat. In Düsseldorf gibt's in der Fußgängerzone einen großen Fahrradstreifen wo die Fußgänger ständig drin rumstehen und sich aufregen wenn man dort fährt. Und auch bei Fahrradstreifen die neben dem Fußweg sind laufen die Fußgänger gerne mitten auf dem Radweg und regen sich auf wenn man dort langfährt.
Solche Begegnungen werden in diese Statistik gezählt. Aber wenn ein Fußgänger in gleicher Weise einfach mitten auf der A1 rumlaufen würde, würde seine Meinung nicht in diese Statistik zählen, sondern er festgenommen oder in die Psychiatrie eingewiesen werden.
"completely different environment", ah, since when is Lemmy US-only?
If you actually think about it, it's absolutely makes sense. The Autobahn has additional stopping lanes for broken down cars and several meters of grass to each side, which means you can safely drive hundreds of kilometers an hour while still being able to see obstructions early enough to brake in time.
Slower motorways have smaller setbacks, but still enough to keep their speeds.
City streets where you can't see people entering the road in time to brake usually have relatively low speed limits to reduce the braking distance as well as the damage caused by a collision.
But if the visibility or braking distance are affected due to weather or broken streetlamps, it's up to you to slow down accordingly. But even for situations like that traffic planners usually add additional signs, it's common to see roads with signs that say
/❄️\
(60)
to warn people to drive slower when the road is freezing or signs that say
/🦌\
(50)
[400m]
to warn of crossing animals in the next 400m and set a lower speed limit.
The same obviously applies when it's not crossing deer but crossing pedestrians.
He also uses his own http server that in turn queries the ldap server solely for the articles. The rest is compiled into the http server binary.
The big issue I see with YouTube premium (though I'm a paid subscriber) is that the bitrate is still far too low. Vimeo provided much better quality a decade ago for paid users and so do Nebula, Floatplane and all the other competing sites nowadays
Tbh das sieht eher nach Salt Bae aus als verkrampft?
,,7o
justJanne
joined 2 years ago
That's still not gonna help at all. There are already hardware cheats using an nvidia jetson nuc, an hdmi splitter, and a usb interceptor plugged between mouse, keyboard and computer.
Using just image recognition and slight adjustments to your mouse movement you can already get an impossible to detect aimbot.
Now the real question is: why are cheats bad? If a cheater is flying in godmode, sure, that ruins the game. But if the game forces cheaters to play the same way top human players are playing... If you can't tell the difference, does it matter?
By just running all simulation server side and banning superhuman reactions you can easily ban all superhuman cheats. Matchmaking will just sort players by skill and you'll have a peaceful game again.
If you're playing chess, you don't know if your opponent uses a chess computer or not. And it doesn't matter. The game is still fun.