784
Yes (programming.dev)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wolo 142 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

my website's backend is made with bash, it calls make for every request and it probably has hundreds of remote arbitrary code execution bugs that will get me pwned someday, it's great

edit: to clarify, it uses a rust program i made to expose the bash scripts as http endpoints, i'm not crazy enough to implement http in bash

it behaves like a static file server, but if a file has the others-execute permission bit set it executes the file instead of reading it

it's surprisingly nice for prototyping since you can just write a cli program and it's automatically available over http too

[-] camr_on@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

For my own sanity, I choose to believe you're lying

[-] PupBiru@kbin.social 74 points 1 year ago
[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

These wounds appear to be self-inflicted.

[-] wolo 16 points 1 year ago

i thought it was neat how php lets you write your website's logic with the same directory tree pattern that clients consume it from, but i didn't want to learn php so i made my own, worse version

[-] technojamin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

That’s a pretty reasonable reaction to the proposition of learning PHP.

[-] Fashim@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago

I pity the hacker who ends up in your system

[-] agilob@programming.dev 50 points 1 year ago

You live like this?

[-] wolo 11 points 1 year ago

I've taken some precautions, it's running in a container as an unprivileged user and the only writable mount is the directory where make writes rendered pages, but i probably should move it into a vm if i want to be completely safe lol

[-] sdw@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago
[-] wolo 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe I'll finally move it into a VM so I can send a link to it here without tempting people :P

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 50 points 1 year ago

I designed a chip architecture that runs bash code on silicon.

I reimplemented x86 assembly in purely bash script.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago
[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

Set -e, please for the love of god, set -e

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] agilob@programming.dev 115 points 1 year ago

Before nginx was a thing, I worked with a guy who forked apache httpd and wrote this blog in C, like, literally embedded html and css inside the server, so when he made a tpyo or was adding another post he had to recompile the source code. The performance was out of this world.

[-] Schmeckinger@feddit.de 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are a lot of solutions like that in rust. You basically compile the template into your code.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yeah, templates can be parsed at compile time but these frameworks are not embeeding whole fucking prerendered static pages/assets

[-] sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago

They are nowadays. Compiling assets and static data into rust and deliver virtual DOM via websocket to the browser is the new cool kid in the corner.

Have a look at dioxus

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Does a file lookup really take that long? Id say the trick was to have just plain old html with no bloat and you're golden.

[-] agilob@programming.dev 29 points 1 year ago

Blog content was stored in memory and it was served with zero-copy to the socket, so yea, it's way faster. It was before times of php-fpm and opcache that we're using now. Back then things were deployed and communicated using tcp sockets (tcp to rails, django or php) or reading from a disk, when the best HDDs were 5600rpm, but rare to find on shared hosting.

[-] THE_STORM_BLADE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Couldn't the html be loaded into memory at the beginning of the program and then served whenever? I understand the reading from disk will be slow, but that only happens once in the beginning.

[-] bazsalanszky@lemmy.toldi.eu 13 points 1 year ago

This reminds me of one of my older projects. I wanted to learn more about network communications, so I started working on a simple P2P chat app. It wasn't anything fancy, but I really enjoyed working on it. One challenge I faced was that, at the time, I didn't know how to listen for user input while handling network communication simultaneously. So, after I had managed to get multiple TCP sockets working on one thread, I thought, why not open another socket for HTTP communication? That way, I could incorporate a fancy web UI instead of just a CLI interface.

So, I wrote a simple HTTP server, which, in hindsight, might not have been necessary.

[-] fireflash38@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago

What if, get this, we put the bash scripts in yaml. And then put it in kubernetes.

[-] PupBiru@kbin.social 59 points 1 year ago

well now you’re just describing ansible

[-] Vash63@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Very, very bad Ansible.

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 27 points 1 year ago

Have you considered embedding python in those bash scripts? I have done this, and it is glorious.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 year ago

I wrote my webserver in pure bash.

bash -c "python -m http.server 8080"

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 year ago

This is false, you also need vim and tmux

[-] Rin@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago

Idk about you but I use echo and sed to edit my files.

[-] clearleaf@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago

Let's just get this out of the way

[-] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

I'm currently trying to relearn all my advanced bash in python.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just don't call it with #!/bin/sh. Because that's POSIX shell, not bash.

[-] philm@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

but effectively it's bash, I think /bin/sh is a symlink to bash on every system I know of...

Edit: I feel corrected, thanks for the information, all the systems I used, had a symlink to bash. Also it was not intended to recommend using bash functionality when having a shebang !#/bin/sh. As someone other pointed out, recommendation would be #!/usr/bin/env bash, or !#/bin/sh if you know that you're not using bash specific functionality.

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Still don't do this. If you use bash specific syntax with this head, that's a bashism and causes issues with people using zsh for example. Or with Debian/*buntu, who use dash as init shell.

Just use #!/bin/bash or #!/usr/bin/env bash if you're funny.

[-] wolo 9 points 1 year ago

#!/bin/bash doesn't work on NixOS since bash is in the nix store somewhere, #!/usr/bin/env bash resolves the correct location regardless of where bash is

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago

No no no no no, do not believe this you will shoot yourself in the foot.

https://wiki.debian.org/Shell

Beginning with DebianSqueeze, Debian uses Dash as the target of the /bin/sh symlink. Dash lacks many of the features one would expect in an interactive shell, making it faster and more memory efficient than Bash.

From DebianSqueeze to DebianBullseye, it was possible to select bash as the target of the /bin/sh symlink (by running dpkg-reconfigure dash). As of DebianBookworm, this is no longer supported.

[-] SurpriseWaterfall@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

It is a symlink, but bash will automatically enable posix compliance mode if you use it. So any bash specific features will bomb out unless you explicitly reset it in the script.

[-] UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wut that is not even the case for Ubuntu. You're probably thinking of dash example:

sh -c '[[ true ]] && echo ya' 
# sh: 1: [[: not found

bash -c '[[ true ]] && echo ya' 
# ya
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

All you need are Bash scripts with chroot and cgroups and some ssh access.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Never sed when you can bash.

[-] einfach_orangensaft@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

i feel this

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
784 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

19804 readers
455 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS