[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 8 months ago

Taking funding from your biggest competitor is a weird business choice.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 8 months ago

This is nvidia exclusive right?

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 10 months ago

no dotted zeroes = no terminal use

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 11 months ago

that is such a bad response, mindboggling.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 1 year ago

Not written in rust, yuck! 😆

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 year ago

Its the best distro for gaming. Valve is using it, rolling distro.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 year ago

More upvotes needed.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 2 years ago

You probably never used fish shell.

55
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by dino@discuss.tchncs.de to c/gaming@beehaw.org

So yeah, I want to discuss or point out why I think Valve needs to fix Anti-Cheat issues. They have VAC but apparently its doing jackshit, be it Counter Strike 2 (any previous iterations) or something like Hunt: Showdown the prevalence of cheating players is non deniable. For me personally it has come to a point that I am not enjoying playing those games anymore, although they are great games by itself. But the amount of occurrences being killed or playing against cheaters is at a height, where I don't see the point anymore.

  • Why I think Valve is the only company able to something against cheaters?

Because they have the tools with VAC already aiming to prevent cheaters. Valve has got the resources to actually invest into something more profound which could be used for any game where anti-cheat protection needs to be implemented. And lastly Valve is the company which is interested in furthering the ability to gaming on Linux, the anti-cheat solution needs to work on both operating systems. Only Valve has the motivation and means to achieve that with their knowledge and resources. What do you guys think about the topic? Is the fight against cheaters hopeless? Do you think some other entity should provide anti-cheat protection, why? I skimmed over "anti cheat in linux kernel" posts in the net, but I have very little knowledge about the topic, what is your stance on it?

Edited: Mixed EAC with VAC. EAC seems to be part of Epic Company. Both of these tools seem unable to prevent cheating like mentioned above.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 years ago

a gun to the head

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

custom windows that rarely gets update...

sounds like an amazing idea.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 2 years ago

If a game doesn't work on linux, I don't buy/play it until it does. End of story. There is plenty of choice and time is limited, so having an extra filter is just helpful.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 years ago

Alpine was never meant as a desktop distribution.

view more: next ›

dino

joined 2 years ago