it was a single admin.

calling you out for being a dick while you are defending Zionist censorship isn't tone policing. you're not righteous. you're just being a dick.

conservative-style misdirection

pigeonholing also doesn't help your case

edit:

giving it back isn't hypocrisy. it's playing by the rules.

you know, you don't have to defend the admins. they're not going to suck you off.

zionism is obviously a political position, and the mods have feigned impartiality about it while moderating anti Zionist sentiment away. you are splitting hairs and it's unbecoming. your shitty attitude is also damaging your case here.

wow, this screed doesn't at all debunk the accusation of overt pro-zionist moderation

edit:

jill stein is anti Zionist, too

it's not a typo, but I can see the syntax is unclear

despite pretending neutrality, .world bases it's moderation on political motivations

edit:

love when they try to poison the well and encourage dog piling. shows they are truly grounded in good faith. /s

the tea is all over yepowertrippinbastards, and i gotta say i agree with the prevailing sentiment. mrkaplan is making a bad move, but its indicative of a pattern of politically based moderation that pervades .world.

copying isn't stealing

who was doing the shooting?

that's not fake money, and it isn't "for" criminals. it's real, and that's why criminals use it.

the co-option is a great reason to be suspicious of anyone flying that, just like the recently coopted symbol the "swastika"

fuck alito. fuck Christian nationalists. fuck the constitution. fuck the supreme Court.