592
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

And this is why I don't have ANY moral qualms about pirating shit: they'd do it to us in a heartbeat if there was a buck to be made.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago
[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 100 points 1 year ago

Pirating Windows for your own personal, private use, which will never directly make you a single dollar: HIGHLY ILLEGAL

Scraping your creative works so they can make billions by selling automated processes that compete against your work: Perfectly fine and normal!

[-] experbia@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

bunch of fuckin art pirates. crying about software piracy while they have their own bots pirating everyone's art.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago

Sure bud, pirating some Microsoft Studio video games and windows ISOs right now. What? I found them on the open web!

[-] probableprotogen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago

Honestly just pirate their games since they keep buying every fucking studio they can get their grummy hands on

[-] bruhduh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, Xbox one/series recently got proof of concept jailbreak, so... I think many people are on board with your thought

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

DMCA for them, no DMCA for us.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 year ago

You're always morally justified to steal from Microsoft

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

So if I see it on the “open web”, I’m free to use it however I please? Oh, I get thrown in jail and everything I own taken away.

If companies are people per “citizens united”, why doesn’t the same apply to them?

[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

And if a company makes a negligent decision, which kills a million people over time, why is no one being put on death row? They can and do have it both ways, but I can still wish for a just world where if companies are people, they can be put to death for mass casualties caused by their decisions.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago
[-] cmhe@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Copying is theft" is the argument of corporations for ages, but if they want our data and information, to integrate into their business, then, suddenly they have the rights to it.

If copying is not theft, then we have the rights to copy their software and AI models, as well, since it is available on the open web.

They got themselves into quite a contradiction.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If copying is not theft, then we have the rights to copy their software

No we don't, copying copyrighted material is copyright infringement. Which is illegal. that does not make it theft though.
Oversimplifying the issue makes for an uninformed debate.

[-] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

any content you produce is automatically copyrighted

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Issue is power imbalance.

There's a clear difference between a guy in his basement on his personal computer sampling music the original musicians almost never seen a single penny from, and a megacorp trying to drive out creative professionals from the industry in the hopes they can then proceed to hike up the prices to use their generative AI software.

[-] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I'm not a fan of AI but I'm generally of the view that anything posted on the internet, visible without a login, is fair game for indexing a search engine, snapshotting a backup (like the internet archive's Wayback Machine), or running user extensions on (including ad blockers). Is training an AI model all that different?

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You can't be for piracy but against LLMs fair the same reason

And I think most of the people on Lemmy are for piracy,

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Womble@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Didnt you hear? We stan draconian IP laws now because AI bad.

[-] SnotFlickerman 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is it that or is it that the laws are selectively applied on little guys and ignored once you make enough money? It certainly looks that way. Once you've achieved a level of "fuck you money" it doesn't matter how unscrupulously you got there. I'm not sure letting the big guys get away with it while little guys still get fucked over is as big of a win as you think it is?


Examples:

The Pirate Bay: Only made enough money to run the site and keep the admins living a middle class lifestyle.

VERDICT: Bad, wrong, and evil. Must be put in jail.

OpenAI: Claims to be non-profit, then spins off for-profit wing. Makes a mint in a deal with Microsoft.

VERDICT: Only the goodest of good people and we must allow them to continue doing so.


The IP laws are stupid but letting fucking rich twats get away with it while regular people will still get fucked by the same rules is kind of a fucking stupid ass hill to die on.

But sure, if we allow the giant companies to do it, SOMEHOW the same rules will "trickle down" to regular people. I think I've heard that story before... No, they only make exceptions for people who can basically print money. They'll still fuck you and me six ways to Sunday for the same.

I mean, the guys who ran Jetflicks, a pirate streaming site, are being hit with potentially 48 year sentences. Longer than a lot of way more serious fucking crimes. I've literally seen murderers get half that.

But yeah, somehow, the same rules will end up being applied to us? My ass. They're literally jailing people for it right now. If that wasn't the case, maybe this argument would have legs.

But AI companies? Totes okay, bro.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] pewgar_seemsimandroid 43 points 1 year ago

so we can steal Microsoft's products?

[-] Zacryon@lemmy.wtf 19 points 1 year ago

Yes. Exactly. Although there isn't much left worth stealing from Microsoft.

(This was a low-key "Microsoft bad, Linux supreme", comment.)

(And now it's no longer low-key.)

(I'm using a touch-screen keyboard for writing this. And yet I can't open my doors using the keyboard. Ever wondered why that is?)

(Correct, because I forgot my keys at home and didn't put them on my keyboard.)

(Now it's just a –board.)

(Oral diarrhea over. Go get some guhd Linux!)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

It's okay to plagiarize books if they're in a library.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago
[-] ayaya@lemdro.id 22 points 1 year ago

If the model isn't overfitted it's also not even copying. By their nature LLMs are transformative which is the whole point of fair use.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] profdc9@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

In other news: we have lawyers to protect our copyrights, you don't. Suck it.

[-] ElectroLisa 27 points 1 year ago

Aight, I'ma steal leaked Windows XP source code :3

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago

There is a thing called usage licenses.

[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Just yet another proof, that the more 0's you have in your valuation, the less the laws apply to you

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago

So its no longer intellectual property if its on the internet? The nerves on this guy...

So you could just copy and use every single helpful support article from Microsoft?

Oh shit, there aren't any

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Apparently he thinks data is like the ducks you find in the park

[-] Capitao_Duarte@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 year ago

Wait, you can steal from those ducks?

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

No one ever tells you this, but you can just take the ducks. Just like with the city pigeons. Just make sure you don't take a government drone by accident.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Brickardo@feddit.nl 20 points 1 year ago

Does Netflix count as the open web? It definitely feels like so, but I'm ready for a wealth hoarder to tell me otherwise!

[-] bilb@lem.monster 17 points 1 year ago
[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Is his personal-information on the dark-web?

Is he saying that if his personal-information is on the dark-web, then it's perfectly-OK for everybody & their robot to be using it??

XOR is he saying that there are 2 kinds of law:

1 for protecting his entitlement,

the other for disallowing rights from the lives he consumes, through his beloved herd/corporation/pseudo-person?

( obviously, he's already answered the latter )

[-] nl4real@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Oh hey, Microsoft support moving away from copyright! Trollface

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

Its not stolen if it is still there afterwards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

He's right, information wants to be free. Don't support stronger copyright just to spite people it'll benefit

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

I think that with respect to content that’s already on microsoft.com, the social contract of that content since the ‘90s has been that it is fair use. Anyone can copy it, recreate with it, reproduce with it. That has been “freeware,” if you like, that’s been the understanding.

Yeah, that's how I've always thought of it.

[-] elias_griffin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So Mustafa steals from the entire world and justifies it by pointing to an abstraction that cannot be proven. It's already complete as they can admit it now and throw Billions at corrupt judges over a decade which will be too late.

These tech-god pyschopaths hate us.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
592 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72686 readers
2102 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS