[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 19 points 1 month ago

“my favourite conspiracy theory is the one that Michelle Obama is a man.”

That isn't even a good conspiracy. (that is also why it is a dogwhistle, if you enjoyed those kinds of crazy conspiracies you would say 'transvestigations where everybody famous is actually trans' is my fave (and yes they do it to everybody, it is very dumb). Focussing only on Michelle is odd, and shows in the kind of environments you hang out with (My example would be Andrew Tate, but it also isn't funny, as it is part of the wider 'make trans people unsafe' campaign, and people should understand that))).

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 19 points 2 months ago

Sneerclub, forever hated for being right to soon.

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 19 points 4 months ago

Good news for women, less risk of the pool needing to be drained because someone crapped in it again.

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 19 points 7 months ago

There was research showing that every linear jump in capabilities needed exponentially more data fed into the models, so seems likely it isn't going to be possible to get where they want to go.

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This clip from bsky put it next to (I think) a clip from american history X, and he even pulls the same face

E: Dutch onion news site Historians: Hitler did the Musk greeting. lol. (The only 'news' in .nl which I so far have seen it call a nazi salute openly btw, so not going well here).

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 19 points 11 months ago

I just stumbled on this post on my “all” feed.

You are the problem here.

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What a bastardization of that post, and Scott's general views on the subject

Can someone summarize how this is a big misinterpretation or mistake?

I'm not in any way MAGA or trumpy or a culture war person [sure you are. E: one sort by controversial later and they are indeed a culture war person not a full time one but still], but I'm a long time SSC reader and I thought the post/article was about the fascinating and complete sorta morhph/takeover of the civic "ethos" or civic religion of the elite bluebloods of the USA.

From veneration of founders and founding fathers (up through Abe Lincoln, etc) as the sorta civic glue and religion that we are brought up on, to now embracing LGBTQ+ (not much emphasis on boring normal "L" and "G" [dog barks]) through parades, flags, police cars, crosswalks, holidayds, add campaigns, corporate slogans and logos, etc.

Is this not how most readers understood the article?

Hope this makes some sscers reconsider being a fan of scotts writing. (And yes there was pushback in the replies)

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 18 points 1 year ago

Puts down Snow Crash.

Ah look the torment nexus.

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Least controversial libertarian. (At least they picked slavery and not ... well you know).

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 19 points 2 years ago

Their next kid will be named Ultima Thule, and they will claim very loudly that this is just because they are so big fans of astrology and that they never heard of the controversy regarding the name.

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 19 points 2 years ago

Cstross was right! You tell everybody. Listen to me. You've gotta tell them! AGI is corporations! We've gotta stop them somehow!

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 19 points 2 years ago

That he called the blog post 'an incredible amount of research' is quite odd. Either it is a failed attempt at sucking up, or a sign Vlad has a very bad idea of what research is.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Soyweiser

joined 2 years ago