[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 87 points 7 months ago

Congrats, you just entered the running to become the next CEO of Boeing. :-|

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 75 points 7 months ago

omg

I wonder if somebody shot the guy?

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 72 points 8 months ago

Nice try, but you can't fool me!

ing

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 79 points 8 months ago

(1) ngl that is amazing, a heart-warming story

(2) still fuck Elon Musk

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 88 points 8 months ago

"I speak alternative facts, making others do the work of figuring out what I meant."

vs.

"I have researched in-depth and know what I am talking about and why."

Tbf there are probably far-right people who are more like the latter. Just b/c I do not recall ever hearing those arguments does not mean that they don't exist!

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 79 points 8 months ago

It is like arguing with a toddler - they KNOW, they are just trying to see if they can get away with it.

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 88 points 8 months ago

Can I just appreciate for a minute how this background is in dark mode rather than blindingly bright white? I cannot say how happy that makes me...

Well, I can try though:

img

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 78 points 8 months ago

Their corporate website mentions that they use the data for marketing purposes. Whatever type of face they see - e.g. male or female, large or skinny, etc. - gets correlated with what was purchased, and then they sell that data for marketing purposes. Exactly like Google selling your search history, except with likely fewer restrictions in place.

Their website doesn't mention how often they get hacked to give away that data for free - to be clear, that data meaning A PICTURE OF YOUR ACTUAL FUCKING FACE. I don't know what resolution, or even what someone would do with it later, I am focusing here on the fact that the picture taking seems nonconsensual, especially for it to be stored in a database rather than simply used in the moment.

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 70 points 9 months ago

1979 was Jimmy Carter, a Democrat. Reagan did not start until 1980, and while he is famous for breaking the backs of unions, thus crippling their ability to fight back against this trend, he did not actually start it.

Before Carter was Ford and Nixon, both Republicans. Ford pardoned Nixon's crimes, supposedly to help "heal the nation".

According to Robert Reich's "Inequality for All" (free link) - he was the Secretary of Labor under Clinton and previously served under both the Carter and Ford administration so he was very much attuned to what was going on - this trend started due to the rise of corporations, which have super-rights that humans do not have. e.g., taxes on stock dividends were capped at like 13% while payroll taxes can go up to >35%, and while if a human commits a crime they would go to jail, but not so with a corporation. It's a great racket scheme for the rich to cover themselves in a legal fiction so as to avoid pretty much any responsibility for their actions. Hence why we see so many corporations acting so very boldly to destroy the planet - after all, why not? What's the worst that could happen to them in return?

[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 71 points 10 months ago

Holy crap that's amazing. Somehow it rings double knowing that he is of Jewish ancestry himself.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

OpenStars

joined 10 months ago