Because if you ignore most details, you can go, "SEE THERE WERE FEDS IN THE CROWD ANTIFA ENTRAPMENT ANTIFA ENTRAPMENT" and pretend that you're still a good person, and get even madder at "the left" and "the deep state". See how right wing media reports this? A bombshell that there were plainclothes agents in the crowd during the riot - all technically true statements. You just don't mention that they showed up *in response to the active mob violence", and let your fans soak up that it was definitely a setup, based on the carefully curated truths and weasel words you give them.
After the shitshow started going down, as orchestrated by High King von Shitzenpants, the feds sent some people in about it, since, you know, there was a mob attack going on at the Capitol, which is the sort of thing that generally draws the attention of law enforcement.
What, by staying out of it?
Shit about "god emperor trump" was satirical right up until it wasn't.
We lived in the bay for a while. It's a bubble, with a skin made of rent prices.
Have ADHD, picking up a pencil intermittently when we have the executive function. Shit's harder for us but come on.
We'd mind a lot less if people treated it like getting a commission. Sure, it's cool that there's art of your character, but you didn't do the drawing, you just gave some specifics.
On priors, you're talking about the Cass report, which was in fact massively flawed, and I saw a great deal of discussion on it. Among other issues, they tossed out a lot of studies, and wrote the report from the stance that the only studies worth looking at would have been double blind studies. I'm not sure if you've considered this specifically, but it's pretty damn hard to blind starting to grow boobs or facial hair. Cass, the supposedly neutral party conducting the study, was handing out copies of "Irreversible Damage", a scaremongering antitrans book about how the poor helpless young "women" were being seduced by big trans. It was garbage, and there's plenty of writeups on it.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-u-k-s-cass-review-badly-fails-trans-children/
If they can't afford to maintain it in a changing world, perhaps we should nationalize the infrastructure that we all depend on.
If someone is in prison, IE, in the care of the state, and unable to choose their own paths, the state is therefore responsible for that person's well-being. In other words, the state is morally mandated to give that person food, medical care, etc.
If you don't want inmates "receiving better coverage and health care than a law-abiding citizen", fucking get law-abiding citizens, you dicksneeze!
Cue anyone sane: "Well-regulated."
view more: next ›
HopeOfTheGunblade
joined 1 year ago
Things are almost always more than one thing.