The unnecessary and confusing functions are horrible, yes, but I'd still say that the fact that they're wrong is the "worst" part.
Right, but saying "I hate the Prius" is not mockery.
His point is that it's fine to hate certain cars but that you still shouldn't mock the people driving them. I think that's kind of a dumb line to draw, but it's not hypocritical or inconsistent.
...he's talking about two different drivers.
The word "prompt" is used correctly here:
My college workflow was to copy the prompt and then "paste without formatting" in Word and leave that copy of the prompt at the top while I worked, I would absolutely have fallen for this. :P
That's the comment you originally responded to. It's two sentences (with a comma splice) and very clearly has nothing to do with AI.
Misreading this and misunderstanding it, as simple as it is, is embarrassing but understandable. Commenting "I hope you lose your degree" because you can't read 28 words of text without drawing completely the wrong conclusion is, again, embarrassing, but not dire.
Arguing in multiple comment threads about it, while your misunderstanding is repeatedly and clearly explained to you, and then saying you "stand by" all of this, makes it clear that you are a complete idiot.
Do you mean that you think a student not using an AI might do that by accident? Otherwise I'm not sure how it's relevant that there might be a real person with that name.
Holy shit, "prompt" is not primarily an AI word. I get not reading an entire article or essay before commenting, but maybe you should read an entire couple of sentences before making a complete ass of yourself for multiple comments in a row. If you can't manage that, just say nothing! It's that easy!
Wot? They didn't say they cheated, they said they kept a copy of the prompt at the top of their document while working.
Presumably the teacher knows which students would need that, and accounts for it.
...whose published work on the essay's subject you can cite?
This is the opening of both Blade Runner movies