787
submitted 6 months ago by juicy@lemmy.today to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Coach@lemmy.world 277 points 6 months ago

Lacy said the family also reported that after the shooting, the family was forced out of the home while officers “rummaged through their house looking for any justification for shooting and killing Ryan”.

Not a good look.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 51 points 6 months ago

Yet it happens every fucking time. 😡

[-] crossmr@kbin.social 23 points 6 months ago

Probably should go watch the actual video: https://dailycaller.com/2024/03/11/ryan-gainer-video-deputy-fatally-shooting-15-year-old-boy-autism/?utm_source=ground.news&utm_medium=referral

He's told to drop it, and literally chases the officer out of the house with it trying to kill him. Bodycam from 2 angles.

[-] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 75 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Edit: Ok, I read the article. Yeah, him charging at the cop with that tool was a really bad move. I still think the situation could have been handled differently. Could have.

Tasers, batons, or just run away. Diffuse the situation. Imagine a judge saying "You charged against a cop with a gardening tool? Sentenced to DEATH!"

The boy didn't get a fair trial. He was murdered with no justification.

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

That's basically what their elected prosecutor will say, I've seen it a lot. They'll say "he has a weapon and was committing a crime, so the shooting was justified." That's what they said when my local pd shot a kid in the back when he was running away. He hadn't done anything but run away and was killed.

[-] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 24 points 6 months ago

He was murdered, if you shoot someone in the back while they are fleeing you are a murderer.

The cop that shot him is a murderer and a coward.

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Yeah, and the states attorney started her excuses with "he was committing a crime" as if execution is the correct answer for running away from police.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Edit: Ok, I read the article. Yeah, him charging at the cop with that tool was a really bad move. I still think the situation could have been handled differently. Could have.

Police in other countries are constantly able to non-lethally subdue people wielding knives. Do not normalize this reaction.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 51 points 6 months ago

As a father of a child with Autism I feel I am more than adequately equipped to respond to this.

I don't think many, if any, neurotypical people understand how Autism can impact a person's ability to process the world in a way that is deemed "normal". This child may not be verbal, may have aggression issues, may have a learning disability, etc.

The last thing that should have happened is someone pulling a gun.

I cry thinking something like this could happen with my son. All it takes is one bad interaction with someone who has absolutely no experience with Autism and this can happen.

For anyone reading this, do yourself a favour. Volunteer with autistic people. It could be at school or in the community but you all need to learn that Autism does not look like the doctor in The Good Doctor.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Saw body cam footage like that once. Guy is on the ground bleeding out and the cop is searching the car for the gun that will justify it. Guy was bleeding out because when asked for his ID reached for his wallet

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 109 points 6 months ago

I didn't even have to open the article to see the boy's skin color. And I'm not remotely shocked.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 88 points 6 months ago

There are great questions as to whether it was appropriate to use deadly force against a 15-year-old autistic kid who was having an episode,

[-] RinseDrizzle@midwest.social 74 points 6 months ago

Ooh, I can answer this one:

No

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] taanegl@lemmy.world 86 points 6 months ago

Another child murdered.

I will not shed a single tear for when cops get shot and killed.

[-] qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee 65 points 6 months ago

US cops really have stored up an incredible amount of badwill, haven't they? Now, I can't help but see Nolan's Batman film (whichever the one is with cops in tunnels), Brooklyn 99 and others as straight up copaganda. Just zero sympathy. The balance will shift at some point, it has to.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

To be fair Brooklyn 99 dunks on cops. Like a lot.

[-] kureta@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 months ago

Final. season was really interesting I that regard. Real cop propaganda is The Rookie. It is shameless.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

The final season was less humorous about it. But even in the earlier seasons, the vast majority of cops outside of the 99 are incompetent, corrupt, or both. Comparatively, Wuntch is one of the least bad in the force.

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 12 points 6 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 76 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Cops killing children dealing with mental help episodes and get rewarded with more funding is something that makes me sick. Body Cam footage shouldn't depend on if cops feel like releasing it should be sent to an independent party automatically. RIP Ryan.

[-] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 62 points 6 months ago

So if a cop, afflicted with PTSD from shooting teenagers, points a gun at me and I kill him in self-defense... Do you think the criminal justice system will hand-wave it away as easily as this?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

So if a cop, afflicted with PTSD from shooting teenagers, points a gun at me and I kill him in self-defense…

The thing is, liberals want to see this as some kind of exercise in fairness. "Oh if can shoot me then I can shoot them!"

No. This is a gang-violence thing. The MS-13 gang member can shoot you because he's got a gun and years of psychological scarring and a willingness to kill to survive. You can't shoot the gang member, because all his buddies will show up at your house, hold you down and skin your dog alive while you're forced to watch, then bust out all your teeth and hang you out to dry as an example.

Cops work the same way.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Vespair@lemm.ee 49 points 6 months ago

For some reason this is unpopular, but I don't think a police officer should be allowed to remove their firearm from its holster until actual assault has occurred, unless non-police citizens are in danger.

A cop merely being scared should never be a reason somebody dies.

If you can't handle the pressure, don't be a fucking cop.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

… and I can’t believe I have to add this, but not obeying is almost never a valid reason to just start blasting. If no one is in danger, police have the power of radios, time, reinforcements

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] _lilith@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago

This piece of shit couldn't fight a 15 year old with a hoe? What a coward. One gut punch and the kid would have folded like a lawn chair.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Aleric@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago

Poor kid must have been planting oak trees. The pig thought they were preventing a future massacre.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago

Let's list all items that do not look like a gun during a police encounter. I'll start:

Small puppy Couch Basketball Bucket full of fruit Ice

I can't think of anymore at the moment. There's bound to be one or two other items.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago

So for context my local PD dealt with a fine gentleman who attacked a security guard in his car dual wielding a hatchet and metal pipe. They spent several hours trying to talk him down before charging him with a shield and arresting him without much further ado. If you guessed he was white you guessed correctly.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

Society failed this boy. More spending on medical research, and care could have prevented this event. But instead we spend way more money on killing more people in other countries. And the medical research could help those who serve in the military as well. But no, must cut those costs as much as posdible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago
[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

TLDR: What is the "5 foot garden tool"? That's all I want to know!

So many details and blame thrown about, but suddenly vague on "gardening tool?" It was 5 feet of something. A rake? A scythe? A stick?

It sort of matters what is in your hands when you approach police; not that that's ever a good idea. Even with a disability, he could be dangerous.

I'm astounded by The Guardian. How does an article explain is such detail the events of an altercation and aftermath yet space so terribly on such basic information?

[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 88 points 6 months ago

Maybe don't take a job of protecting and serving if a kid with a gardening tool is a bit too frightening for you to handle non-lethally.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 73 points 6 months ago

Yeah, the kid didn't have something dangerous like an acorn.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 36 points 6 months ago

Too bad he wasn't a big white man with a knife! Then the cops would have tried to talk him down!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Aren't police carrying non-lethal stuff like tasers and trained in deescalation techniques that could be used to subdue someone without shooting them?

Edit: not 'desecration', although maybe they are

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 6 months ago

Some do carry batons, pepper spray, or tasers. All carry guns.

Some might be trained in deescalation. Some might be trained in "killology": https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/08/warrior-cop-class-dave-grossman-killology.html

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

Whatever happened to tasers? I guess it's not that convenient for the police to have someone capable of suing back, makes one wonder how many cases aren't able to get the attention this kid is.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Nonononoki@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Kid ran towards the officer with an axe, don't run towards someone with an axe if they have a gun.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 20 points 6 months ago

You saw everyone else getting downvoted to hell for this bad take, and decided you wanted some too huh? Much obliged.

[-] _lilith@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

It was a hoe. Capital punishment for an episode in the garden is probably a bad take

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
787 points (100.0% liked)

News

22896 readers
3639 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS