70
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

I really don't get the fawning over PIC season 3. It was bad. I'd love to see more of Ryan in a new series, but only if they recruit writers on par with SNW and lose the phone numbers of those who did PIC.

[-] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I can’t wrap my head around it either. Easily the worst, most self indulgent season of Trek in my opinion.

But it had the TNG crew back aboard the Enterprise D so for a lot of people it’s hitting the nostalgia button.

[-] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It wasn’t great, but it was notably better than season 2 in that it actually felt like a season of a show with some thought put into some kind of continuity. Season 2 was a huge clusterfuck of awful

I would argue that even if season two's ambitions exceeded it's execution, at least it was trying to do something. Still not a season of Trek that I think deserves any real regard, but it did add something new and interesting to the fabric of Trek. And maybe at some point some comic book or novel will actually do something interesting with that thing, because I can't imagine we're ever actually going to see it revisited on screen.

Season three was exactly the dark, cynical mess that everyone complained season one was because Admiral Clancy cursed at their space dad. Jack Crusher is the infallible, ultra special badass everyone accuses Michael Burnham of being. Season three is ideas I would expect to find in someone's first attempt at writing fanfic, not the work of seasoned television professionals.

And, to be fair, both seasons two and three were made by the same people, so the fact that neither of them were particularly good should not be shocking to anyone.

[-] 1simpletailer@startrek.website 9 points 1 year ago

It was.... Okay. Better then the first 2 seasons of Pic by a mile at least. If it was just the first 5 or so episodes I might even call it good. Yeah it was big, dumb, and loud, but it was also full of nostalgia bait, some of which admittedly did resonate with me. The bar was just so low after the TNG movies and first two season of PIC that traumatized fans were happy to have a seemingly final sendoff that wasn't completely terrible.

The bar was just so low after the TNG movies and first two season of PIC that traumatized fans were happy to have a seemingly final sendoff that wasn’t completely terrible.

"Traumatized?" We are talking about a television show, right?

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

We are using hyperboles to make communication more fun.

[-] SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

The deaths of

spoilerHugh and Icheb
were particularly upsetting for me, personally (especially the graphic nature of the latter). PIC S1 had way too much "let's kill people for no good reason" events.

I'd be perfectly happy if the dead PIC characters just showed up alive and well in a later show, no reason given. (They already did this with Q, right?)

Fair, PIC did have some pretty rugged moments.

But would you say you actually experienced trauma watching season one, and then that trauma was alleviated watching season three?

[-] SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

No and no. I was disappointed and a bit upset, but not traumatized. Though if someone told me that the beginning of S1E5 was traumatic for them, I'd believe it.

I do believe people when they say they enjoy S3. Even though the story was just a bunch of reheated plot elements from other Treks, there is some joy to be had viewing it as a TNG reunion special. It's "Return to Mayberry" to the tune of BSG 2003, nothing more and nothing less.

(In contrast, Star Trek IV is the best TV reunion special ever made. Everyone's playing an exaggerated version of their 1960's personas and having a blast. It too is a bunch of reheated plot elements - the probe is awfully similar to Nomad and V'Ger at first glance, and "let's time travel to insert current year" was already the plot of two different TOS episodes. I'm trying to think of how a hypothetical good Picard season could've tapped into the same energy that STIV did.)

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I barely got through S1. Terrible show.

Jeri has aged like a fine wine, but I'm not so desperate for TNG nostalgia that I'll watch fat Data.

[-] daft61lunacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Indeed but it was unapologetic fan service towards the end.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

They have to cast her. She’s one of the most compelling Trek characters we’ve seen.

[-] Sekrayray@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Can this please be marked as some sort of spoiler? I haven’t watched Picard Season 3 yet and this was a massive spoiler bait title…

[-] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 27 points 1 year ago

We generally don't protect spoilers after about a week. In this case, it's been nearly a year.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Same, but to be fair we really should have watched it by now

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It it's any consolation, it has literally zero bearing on the actual plot.

[-] halm@leminal.space 11 points 1 year ago

TrekMovie […] asked if she is ready to lead the much-discussed Star Trek: Legacy spin-off

Much-discussed but still to be officially verified.

IMO they need to jettison at least Jack Crusher and his Jedi lineage for that show to be even theoretically tolerable. Terry Matalas really showed with Picard s3 that he has no flair for Trek.

[-] SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think the actor was bad. Having him be a doctor on Legacy (he is a doctor, right?) would be a good use of the actor and the character's past without having it be the focus of the show.

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Omgz she kissed a girl thats a major plot point

[-] Penguincoder@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Gaaaaaaaaaayayyyyyyyyy ~/s~

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
70 points (100.0% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

10943 readers
40 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll busmittions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissure Quest"
12-19 LD 5x10 "The New Next Generation"
01-24 Film "Section 31"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (TBA)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)


In Development

Untitled theatrical film

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS