925
inflation rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago by glizzyguzzler to c/196
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] monko@lemmy.zip 59 points 1 year ago

What if we reduce the cost of living instead, lol jk gotta feed the landlords

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 39 points 1 year ago

Only temporairally. Prices would fall back down again as competition theoretically kicks in.

[-] HorseRabbit@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 1 year ago

You don't really believe that, do you?

[-] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

The wealth will trickle down eventually 👍

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Surely the dragon will be satisfied when we let him eat the next village!

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

I do. It’s basic market forces.

I say therothetically because the US doesn’t enforce antitrust laws.

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Prices usually don't fall. Falling prices are generally seen as really bad. Prices instead stop going up so fast.

[-] TeckFire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

To some degree. We’ve seen prices rise in the pandemic and drop back down substantially over time back to pre-pandemic numbers. Look at price trends for construction supplies, for instance. Not sure if that is what you’re referring to, however

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

Relative to inflation.

[-] SolarMech@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which is "ok" as wages will start to go up over time (for some). But some wages don't climb as fast and some people are on fixed revenue (old people, disabled people).

So it requires readjustments

[-] Spesknight@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe my math is wrong somewhere but I converted to dollars, multiplied the monthly amount by 12, and divided by 2080 (52 weeks*40hrs) and got $7/hr.

If they're excited about the "millions" being helped by a 5% increase to $7/hr their economy is probably not a good comparison to the US.

[-] Spesknight@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Costs of living is not the same, you cannot compare the totals, it is better to compare the rise amount (in wages vs inflation). That was the point of the thread, right?

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

well yeah but the cost of living would go up even higher.

[-] Poiar@sh.itjust.works 70 points 1 year ago

Pegging the minimum wage to inflation would checks notes only make the poor richer, and we can't have that

[-] Maven@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

If we're pegging the minimum wage then call me "$7.25 an hour"

[-] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago

Not reflected in any long-term wage increase or min-wage-introduction economic observations and studies conducted in the last 40 years. This is one of those "it feels 'logical'" talking points that capital likes to tout but is in no way backed up by data or empirical evidence.

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

sounds like something somebody who has no problem affording food & shelter would say.

[-] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're missing my point. The individual experience, while important and not something we should ignore, does not invalidate the now-decades worth of data we have that shows your original posture (raising min wage leads to increased cost of living) is incorrect.

Make no mistake: costs for staple goods have increased in that time and inequality and share of GDP that belongs to labor have gone to hell, but it's not because of minimum wages or in any way related to their increases. If you want to blame anyone blame runaway healthcare costs, consolidation and unenforced monopolization of business, the decoupling of labor efficiency and labor pay, globalization and automation increasing competition and depressing local wages...etc

[-] glizzyguzzler 28 points 1 year ago

You careen right into being priced out of living with that argument. If you are pegged at a constant wage, that was theoretically enough when it was introduced, for more than a decade while the cost of living rises continuously, then you will be priced out of… living.

And that’s not ethical; fake number money should ultimately serve ensuring acceptable lives instead of keeping the cost of living from rising even farther past unlivable. It‘sa already unlivable - it doesn’t matter if it’s 10% over unlivable or 100%, it’s still an unlivable minimum wage.

Money is very evil for people with little of it. There’s a minimum you need to live. If you are under it, you may not live anymore. If you are just over it, you barely survive. If you make three times it, everything is fine. It gets worse from there (like ten times lets you buy a home and accrue equity while not bleeding money to renting housing, and your mortgage is lower than comparable rent to boot).

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

We poor people ARE being priced out of living. It's happening right now!

[-] glizzyguzzler 5 points 1 year ago

Ye that’s why I posted this one :3 gib us cot adjusted wage; if ur “bidness” cant b profit at living wage then u best git gud or git out

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago
[-] Zoop@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I'm glad to see other members of the Pickle Party around here.

PICKLES! WILL! PREVAIL!

[-] fatboy93@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Funny story, we are moving out of our apartment to another in the same city, because that is close to $300 cheaper.

We had an issue in the bathroom and the maintenence guy comes and we make small talk. I find that he lives in another apartment complex, the property managers live in another apartment complex, because the ones I live in is expensive and the housing in our city is expensive that none of us can afford to buy one.

[-] glizzyguzzler 4 points 1 year ago

And they’ve done it, those people are living in the company town :(

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
925 points (100.0% liked)

196

17258 readers
1857 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS