It really wouldn't be. Trump would be clearly winning if she did that.

So keep your kids and the pedophiles safe; don't send your kids to church.

That last line tips into "has to be sarcasm" territory. I don't think anyone believes America doesn't meddle.

If you don't know phonics, how does looking at the letters help?

The immunity thing only protects the president from criminal prosecution; it doesn't grant them additional powers if they say it's official. Attempting to pardon people you didn't have the authority to pardon is not a criminal act. He'd have to go hold a gun to the governor to get that pardon signed or similar.

Considering we're trying to find lengths, shouldn't we be doing absolute value squared?

Kissinger is dead; will you accept Cheney?

That's not who you voted for but that you voted in the election.

The reasonable people I vote for that represent my interests do.

I do not feel like this is an accurate representation of the people who actually get elected.

They don't actually understand what you're asking for so they aren't going to go do the task. They'll give whatever answer seems plausible based on what everyone else in their training data has said. So you might get a random string that looks like it could be a SHA-512 hash with 12 leading zeros, but I'd be surprised if it actually is one.

Regulating sunscreen as a drug seems fairly reasonable to me. Sunscreens should be required to be effective and proved to be so before being on the market. Cosmetics don't have that requirement. Maybe they should make the process easier and relax the animal testing requirement in cases where it's been used on humans for decades. But I still want corporations to jump through some hoops proving something I'm trusting my health to actually works.

I think the second sentence makes it not. If the guy didn't have a really good reason for doing so, the other people on the plane wouldn't have supported his actions. It's clickbaity. But the title to me makes it sound like the guy might be a hero.