925
inflation rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 10 months ago by glizzyguzzler to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 28 points 10 months ago

Not reflected in any long-term wage increase or min-wage-introduction economic observations and studies conducted in the last 40 years. This is one of those "it feels 'logical'" talking points that capital likes to tout but is in no way backed up by data or empirical evidence.

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

sounds like something somebody who has no problem affording food & shelter would say.

[-] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You're missing my point. The individual experience, while important and not something we should ignore, does not invalidate the now-decades worth of data we have that shows your original posture (raising min wage leads to increased cost of living) is incorrect.

Make no mistake: costs for staple goods have increased in that time and inequality and share of GDP that belongs to labor have gone to hell, but it's not because of minimum wages or in any way related to their increases. If you want to blame anyone blame runaway healthcare costs, consolidation and unenforced monopolization of business, the decoupling of labor efficiency and labor pay, globalization and automation increasing competition and depressing local wages...etc

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
925 points (100.0% liked)

196

16769 readers
2653 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS