318
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rosco@sh.itjust.works 181 points 1 year ago

would be cool if inertia wasn't a thing

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 130 points 1 year ago

People have a terrible understanding of orbital mechanics and apparent weightlessness. It's not like gravity just stops affecting you after you get out of the atmosphere. Getting out of the atmosphere is the easy part of getting to orbit. Going sideways fast enough is the hard part.

[-] Rosco@sh.itjust.works 85 points 1 year ago

I feel like everyone should play KSP, just to get a taste of it

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I used to baby sit a friend's kid when he was a wee lad, frankly we spent most time playing KSP. Used to give him challenges like if he could build a ship using x amount of parts and make orbit would let him order out pizza instead of food his mom prepared for us. He rarely succeeded at first but apparently kept at it long after I stopped mentoring him and apparently is now going to school to be an aerospace engineer. And before all that his mom could never get him to do his math homework as a tyke.

[-] Rosco@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pizza has a strange powers over humans. Good job friend.

[-] Hupf@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago

The real friends is the pizza we make along the way.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Definitely not all those kerbals stranded on Duna. He never did figure out how to properly make it there and back

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Nothing got me working on math quite like trying to figure out my ship's ∆v back in 2014 before I installed Kerbal Engineer

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That's where I learned about it.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Watching the trajectory change as you accelerate is so satisfying...

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

what? are you telling me I couldn't reach the other side of the planet by jumping for 12h ?

[-] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

Anon's airship has inertial dampeners. Checkmate, atheists.

[-] Rykzon@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

That's easy, instead of accelerating towards your destination you just have to brake and stop moving to let the earth move under you, checkmate physics

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 112 points 1 year ago

This is dumb as shit. Hot air balloons only go so high, less than 70k feet according to records. They only stay aloft if the heat is continually applied, if not, air cools and they sink. They move with the air, and the air moves with the planet.

This doesn’t work for the same reason jumping in an airplane doesn’t slam you into the back wall.

[-] Willy@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago

I don't think it was posted because it was brilliant…

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Ok but they're going really really high up

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

If you go much higher the balloon will leak heat through black body radiation faster than you'll be able to heat it. And even if you insulated the balloon in a way that didn't add too much weight you'd eventually get to the top of the atmosphere and hot air balloons won't go into space because they don't have any propulsion systems.

If you fill it with helium, it will go into space, and then it will immediately explode.

[-] MashedTech@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but anon smart, u dumb. Checkmate.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Balloons using hydrogen can reach 33 miles. But even then the atmosphere still moves with the ground.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

World view reaches 100k feet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 70 points 1 year ago

This is just playing into the hands of big basket.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 69 points 1 year ago

I hope troll logic makes a comeback

[-] Rolando@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

ikr they forgor to say "Problem?"

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

I hope so too, given how many people are taking this seriously.

[-] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 33 points 1 year ago

Missed opportunity there: get more seats installed or attach the balloon to a bus or something, I don't know - and whenever the earth below rotates to where your destination is, just yeet yourself out Felix Baumgartner style.

More people means more profit and fewer busloon trips needed, meaning the eco footprint is smaller and you'll get a Christmas card off a random polar bear/penguin thanking you your service.

The only minor inconvenience I can think of is that your parachute effectively takes up your carry-on luggage allowance so you'll have to pay to check anything that doesn't fit in your pockets, but other than that I think you're good to go

[-] ziixe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

attach the balloon to a bus

Yo boys we're going on the battle bus (sorry for my terrible joke, it just reminded me that I'm fucking old because this was popular like 6 years ago)

[-] b0gl@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Don't forget to thank the busdriver

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I think in a balloon bus, it's a balldriver

[-] wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

just yeet yourself out Felix Baumgartner style.

this would be so awesome. i'd spend the whole time trying to come up with something clever to say, right before the yeeting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com 29 points 1 year ago

I’m not a rocket surgeon, but I think the amount of energy required to reach orbit is higher than what a jet would use.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 33 points 1 year ago

Nah, weather balloons can get really really high. The problem here is, the atmosphere doesn’t “end” it just gets thinner and thinner. You would still spin with the earth, just a bit slower.

[-] prowess2956@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Okay so then like, 14 hours.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

I think it would probably be more like several days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lung@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Op homie invented space travel

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

And winds aloft are often going much much faster than on the ground.

And temps, youd have to do a lot to keep warm.

And pressurization, at ~60k ft your blood boils.

[-] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

That’s how you make your money! Sell them suits!

The suits don’t have to work. The customer won’t complain either way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Not exactly brain science is it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] clearleaf@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Your move, globe heads.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago
[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

That does not answer the question. The balloon is not going to orbit, high atmospheric balloons exist and do not require propulsion.

The reason it won't work is because the atmosphere is coupled to the ground and rotates with the ground.

[-] TinklesMcPoo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you have some terms mixed up. Orbit would refer to a body moving around another body is some type of elliptical revolution. High atmosphere balloons do require propulsion to get to altitude. The atmosphere coupled with the ground makes no sense. (think of a constant spinning marble in a gold fish bowl, the surrounding water doesn't stay perfectly in line with the marble)

The cartoon above does answer the question to some degree though. Essentially in order for the balloon to be stationary while the earth rotates below you would need a propulsion system to maintain its height (fight gravity) as well as combat high winds (that would prevent it from staying "stationary" relative to the earth below). I would imagine the benefit of getting outside of the earth atmosphere completely (which is what I believe you meant by orbit) is there would be no wind to fight against. The problem then is that the balloon would've popped by then.

I think that's right but someone could correct me.

EDIT: Realizing we're talking about high altitude balloons which wouldn't need a propulsion system to achieve altitude, but would not be able to maintain altitude before popping. I think the rest of my statement stands true.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Balloons go to 12 miles all the time, they stay at whatever altitude they are neutrally buoyant at. The OP says hot air balloons, but if you ignore that requirement you can get a non propulsed balloon to 30 miles up. It doesn't just pop, it does leak slowly bc no bag is perfect.

https://www.isas.jaxa.jp/j/topics/topics/2013/0920.shtml

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Conservation of momentum.

You don't suddenly stop moving with the Earth just because you're no longer standing on terra firma. Like, if you throw a ball it doesn't just suddenly fall straight to the ground once it leaves your hand.

Plus, in a hot air balloon you're still in the atmosphere... Which is also moving. But even if you were in the total vacuum of space, the above applies and you still wouldn't remain stationary without actively countering the momentum you already have. And then you'd just be pulled in by gravity, unless you actively counter that too. And all that countering of forces is way more costly with fuel than simply accounting for the fact you're already moving at super high speeds along with the rotation of the planet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 year ago

Going from the US to Japan or China by hot air balloon would mean going the long way over Europe due to the jet stream, this would take more than 12h.

[-] supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

If they don't understand gravity, I suspect the jet stream will be harder to grasp

[-] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think he'd run out of oxygen that high up wouldn't he? Or it would get too cold for the balloon to stay inflated if he didn't freeze to death first? Also, is a hot air balloon even capable of lifting a 500lb man-child that high? Would there even be room for his mobility scooter, his snacks and his high performance gaming PC?

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The density of the air becomes so thin that I don't think you could have a container for enough hot air that wouldn't weigh more than the lift provided. Helium weather balloons end up getting so large because of the pressure difference that they end up bursting at those altitudes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
318 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

6710 readers
695 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS