This stuff should ring alarm bells for anyone who studied history, because these are 1920s/1930s Germany-style micro movements.
Naziism didn't start with the Final Solution. It didn't start with work camps. It didn't even start with the beer Hall putsch. It started with things like this.
For sure. But what do we do?
In Germany, they can ban extremist parties as a result of historic events. That's what under consideration with the AfD. The US could persue the same route, although it is probably harder in a two-party system.
Especially since we'd effectively have to ban Republicans which would seem to be going a fascist route. As ironic as that is...
The paradox of tolerance is only a paradox when all context is removed.
"Banning a political party" completely and utterly forgets the, "... that uses more and more stochastic terrorism and acts more and more like evil groups from history that committed great atrocities" part.
Exactly. Unfortunately I don't think most people would understand that and see banning one of two political parties are extreme overreach.
I don't really see how that could work on its own. So the party is banned, so what? All the deplorables are still around and now they've got one more grievance to get riled up about. By fracturing the party you nullify their political power and that's obviously a good thing, but it might increase the likelihood they resort to terrorism. The only solution I can see working is fixing our education system, but that doesn't help in the short term.
The thing is, the active fascists are an extreme minority in most cases. They only have support because of the methods of disinformation and populism they use.
The majority of their base aren't horrible people who want to see the world burn down around them. They've just been told that's whats best for them by charismatic politicians.
So the party is banned, so what? All the deplorables are still around and now they've got one more grievance to get riled up about.
They would have limited power when their party doesn't have any votes.
That would be massively illegal under US law, specifically the first amendment.
True. It may have to be done in a different way.
Germany has free speech similar to the first amendment in the US, but they also have strict laws against hate speech and extremism. That is different from the US, where the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that hate speech is often protected by the first amendment.
They're gonna hate me for this one but arm yourself and train. Lets take a hypothetical to the endgame, lets say there are nazi style brownshirts roaming the streets in 10 years time, do you think it would be better to be unarmed with strong gun control, or like me do you think at least half of the roughly 400 million guns that already are here would end up in the brownshirts hands anyway?
You have the correct approach, and it is the moral duty of sites such as this one to stop fucking banning people for saying it.
Start punching Nazis at any opportunity, when you see someone punching a Nazi, look the other way.
I've never seen a Nazi in person (and been aware of their fascism). In seriousness have you? What happened when you punched them?
Username checks out. 🖕🏼
Seriously. When they show up in khakis and black masks, make them fear for their safety.
I abhor violence, but it’s going to take violence to prevent huge systemic violence down the road. If these fucks come to real power, I know I’ll be on one of the lists.
They go around in groups though. The only time they actually admit to be Nazis is when they've got their friends around them and they're waving flags.
It's like this in every country. They hold demonstrations and then 10 times the number of counter protesters turn up. I'll get worried when the number of counter protesters goes down but I've not yet seen that.
Follow them home.
Overall I’m not sure. But it sure would be nice if news channels were required to tell the truth or be held accountable if creating and spreading lies which indoctrinate people into actions like this.
We all should collectively boycott what passes for "news" these days. It is all terrible. Although it has always had inflection points where the rich barons try to control the tone of the public through their media empires, so not sure if we can ever fully quell the corruption that seems to eventually bleed back into journalism periodically.
One of the things to be careful about is the "they're all equally bad" fallacy. No side is ever going to be perfect, but there are huge differences between organizations that make the occasional bad decision and organizations that are dedicated to distorting and lying in whatever way is necessary to justify their ideological points.
OAN is not a news organization at ll. Fox reports actual news, but always gives priority to propaganda. CBS and ABC aren't terrible, but are far more concerned with ratings than news. NBC is similar, but they chase a more liberal audience.
NPR, PBS, and the BBC are all quite good about doing honest journalism. Start there if you want to know what it actually going on. Then cross-check it against other sources.
How's that gonna stop my redneck relatives from being fed lies?
Be prepared to kill Nazis if it comes down to it. But try every possible democratic solution prior to it.
The biggest part is simply voting and talking to people who will listen to you to vote.
Areavaderchee
Did you figure out any solutions while in the delta quadrant?
But seriously. A very good question. Last time, the fascist uprise that was also starting in the US (yes, it was becoming very popular here in the 1930s) leading up to WWII was quelled after Pearl Harbor and we joined the war.
I don't really want to have to have a world war again to stop fascism. Why can't we fucking learn from history?
Although, as you know, after WWIII, we did then get warp drive. So...
Acknowledge and learn. Vote with conscience and pragmatism.
Voting is the minimum effort. We are going to need a lot more than that to stop the republican party.
The minimum effort, but also one of the most easily accessible (even in areas of disenfranchisement) and most influential.
Its not as direct as throwing a brick through some lobbyists window, but its also more likely to have an effect on the world and less likely to land you in prison.
Just organizing locally is a next step beyond voting.
Put "republican" hired to shoot "Democrat" in the headline
By deliberately de-emphasizing the crimes of republicans they are thereby absolved and emboldened.
BBC knows better but doesn't do the right thing. Why? Why indeed.
Odd that just doing that is great, but notice that this is the BBC not an american source. Its almost like if you want the best news about your country and its real issues and good things its best to never look in the sources from that country.
There is a good book on modern fascism Fascism Today: What It Is and How to End It (excepts)
There is liberal anti fascist action (e.g. suing them, petitions, boycotts) and autonomous anti fascist action (less polite). The latter isn't about violence, but to disrupt fascist events. The strategy is to prevent them from recruiting - prevent them from speaking because we know that clever fascist speech and their lies can lead to recruitment.
The Republican party has evolved from organized crime to domestic terrorists.
You're not saying anything about Republicans that they aren't bragging about. Don't forget that this was the actual CPAC 2022 motto:
Fact check, just because I had never seen this and it's bananas... The image is real, but it was the title of talk or some nonsense. They're being "tongue in cheek" but also are they?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cpac-banner-domestic-terrorists/
In fairness they didn't view it as open admittance; rather they thought the idea was so absurd and ridiculous that they're mocking the very notion.
Unfortunately for us all though, it's simply the truth.
If you're mocking the fact that you're being called Domestic Terrorists by embracing it, then you clearly don't mind being called a domestic terrorist.
And there's effectively no difference in how you should treat someone who embraces being called a domestic terrorist and one who's acted on being one.
The party thats swatting its own party or sending mass death threats to people they don't agree with? Not sure where that idea comes from
No surprise that he's a Trump supporter who, after losing an election by 50%, said it was 'rigged' and he didn't accept the results and wouldn't concede.
Unlike Trump, he's not rich and famous enough to get away with murder.
I see the party of law and order is lawing and ordering again.
Well if they execute anyone for any crime this should be one crime worthy of it
When a companys employee commits a crime. The company and individual is responsible.
When the Republican party commits crimes. No consequences to anyone but the individual.
Seems like no one thinks there's anything wrong here.
I absolutely see something wrong with it and I insist that it is the President's specific job and moral duty to protect America from domestic terrorist cults and he should absolutely declare the GOP a Clear And Present Danger and shut down their offices and their media outlets. It's literally his job, but he wont because "lots of my friends are Republicans".
If I do an adhoc hitman sting operation and forward all requests to the FBI, do I get to pocket the money?
Redneck John Oliver.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.