462
Paramount is genius (i.imgflip.com)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 60 points 9 months ago

Remember everyone, media piracy is in the spirit of a tv show about a post-scarcity socialist utopian future.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 13 points 9 months ago

I feel like Quark giddily grabbing his security rods to break into Sisko's personal logs.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 57 points 9 months ago

Wtf why did a parrot land on my shoulder

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

It's a mystery!

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Do you have a sudden urge to sing sea shanties?

[-] DestroyerOfWorlds@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

I'm happy about the long curly hair, but the hook for a hand, peg leg, and eye patch arrrren't great. Worth it, but not great. Arrrr arrrr.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 53 points 9 months ago

That's okay I'll just watch it on Netfli...WHAT!? Since almost two years ago you say? Because of late-stage capitalism you say?

[-] omgitsaheadcrab@sh.itjust.works 32 points 9 months ago

I really miss old Netflix. Even had Disney movies 😭

[-] Landmammals@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago

The worst part is, Netflix didn't even mess up. All the content owners decided to pull their licenses and make their own Netflix. Now we have 200 streaming services.

So I joined the party and made my own netflix. And not to toot my own horn, but it's the best one.

[-] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Well, they did mess up. That mistake was to make content of their own. This angered the other studios so they pulled content and here we are.

[-] tristan@aussie.zone 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think the issue started long before that. Netflix always had issues with content owners licensing it for one country but not for others, or asking huge fees to license for multiple countries. They'd also limit which shows Netflix could have at any time.

This meant Netflix had to manage many different catalogues for different regions and constantly cycle shows on and off just to make the content owners happy

Once content owners started realising they could milk Netflix for all it had, Netflix really had to start making content to reduce its risk and dependence on other studios

The issue is and always was corporate greed, on every level

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

There was multiple mess ups from many different places. Netflix making their own content was just an excuse.

First off the government allowed consolidation of the studios. All of the buyout and mergers reduced the number of players.

Netflix, video stores, and theatres before them were/are distributors. They did not create any products but acted as a local point of sale.

A distributor only makes sense when the producers and customers have a high level of segmentation and they can't economically or efficiently connect directly. When the producers are consolidated enough, cutting out a distribution network in an attempt to generate more profit is inevitable. It never works out as expected.

In general the producers can not offer the level of service that the distributor did. So the customer always suffer from a decline in service. It also always becomes more expensive for the customer with shittier products. The producing companies try to make up for losses in revenue from sales with lower quality cheaper product.

Now if the government had blocked the studio consolidation we would have likely have seen the rise of distributor competition. Distributor competition is very, very good for the consumer. When multiple companies are offering the same product but offering differing levels of service the consumer benefits.

The producers if they are smart make the same amount of money from all of the distributors and focus on making high quality products they can sell at a premium.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OpenStars@startrek.website 9 points 9 months ago

Those were the days...:-D

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago

So here's an unpopular opinion, but this isn't a bad thing. It's just not enough.

The biggest reason that legal, paid Streaming is so shitty these days, the reason people miss old Netflix, is that everything is spread across so many different platforms now. Back in the day, just having Netflix meant you had just about everything, and if you wanted more still you could get Hulu... and that was it. One, maybe two subscriptions, and you're set. But now? Now you need half a dozen subscriptions and you're still picking what things you won't get. If content was more centralized again, that wouldn't be a problem.

And if content was more centralized, that centralized platform would have PLENTY of subscribers, they wouldn't need to add commercials and hike prices just to stay afloat. I mean... they'd do it anyway because capitalism enshittifies everything, but it wouldn't be a do or fail situation for them.

The only thing I ever used the Paramount streaming for was Trek. I wouldn't complain if Trek, ALL Trek, migrated to somewhere else that has other things I like, too.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

We think there is a fundamental misconception about piracy. Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem," he said. "If a pirate offers a product anywhere in the world, 24 x 7, purchasable from the convenience of your personal computer, and the legal provider says the product is region-locked, will come to your country 3 months after the US release, and can only be purchased at a brick and mortar store, then the pirate's service is more valuable.
-Gabe Newell

[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

The problem is that the people who hold the rights don't want to share. They want that sweet, sweet, monthly subscription income. They don't want to compete because that means they'll potentially earn less and have to spend more.

I tell people about fmovies every chance I get because it has just about anything you are looking for. I've only run into a few titles they don't have.

No registration, completely free, and easy to use.

[-] elephantium@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

IMO, we really need an update to copyright law covering streaming. Think of how Redbox would just buy DVDs even though studios wanted them to wait about 2 months.

Streaming services should have a similar option. Then they'd need to compete on features, not on the streaming equivalent of "you can only watch this movie if you buy a Betamax player".

[-] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

It's odd that people are against monopolies, generally speaking, but for streaming services we would prefer if there were a few giant companies which owned it all.

I'm not disagreeing with the above, just thought it was curious.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

Compare Movie/TV-show streaming to the Music streaming industry. Spotify/Tidal/Apple/Amazon all offer access to the same music (more or less). They compete on features/quality/apps/prices/etc. They don't compete based on their exclusive libraries. Somehow the music industry can survive in that model. Video streaming needs to do the same. Stop the exclusivity. This way, monopolies are not needed in video streaming.

[-] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

All we'd really need to do that is just make it a law that contracts aren't exclusive.

If shows were sold to multiple streaming services legally, then those services would compete based on the actual service they offer, and not the content they have.

In other words, make streaming services the customers for shows, instead of individuals, and then let people be their customers.

As it is, a streaming service is pretty comparable to a car dealership.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

This is why I own most of star trek on dvd. Cant take that away from me.

Its also very difficult to find complete torrent for the series. Just too much content that nobody wants to host the wild file sizes

[-] MelodiousFunk@startrek.website 8 points 9 months ago

This is why I own most of star trek on dvd. Cant take that away from me.

I was so disappointed when the HD remasters stopped. I snapped up TOS, Animated, TNG, and all the movies on Blu-ray (replacing DVDs in the case of the movies and TNG) despite them being available on Netflix at the time. I was really looking forward to catching up with DS9 and Voyager the same way since I was only able to catch them sporadically when they were airing... but no, it seems these are doomed to remain in SD purgatory.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

There is a group has who completed an upscaling remaster of DS9. It's very very well done (though could be better with better source material from the producers).

They are working on Voyager now that DS9 is done. They've completed season 1 of voyager so far.

https://ds9redefined.wordpress.com/

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dudinax@programming.dev 39 points 9 months ago

If content is being streamed commercially, any other commercial streamer should be allowed to stream it for a fixed royalty. Every streaming service should have all publicly available content that they want to stream, and they should compete on quality of service and price.

[-] ChillPill@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

they should compete on quality of service and price

But they don't, they compete on "exclusives" to their platforms. Thus increasing the fragmentation in the market and exacerbating the end user. We're basically back to the days of cable...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bentropy@feddit.de 35 points 9 months ago
[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 94 points 9 months ago

Paramount removed all the Star Trek movies from their own streaming service, and gave them to HBO MAX. They have always billed their streaming service as "All things trek", but now they don't allow you to stream their own properties on their own streaming service.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

That and hiking their prices like the rest of the streaming services while having a fraction of the new content.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

War is peace
Freedom is slavery
Ignorance is strength
Pay more for getting less

[-] naught@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

it's like 5.99 to watch 45 minute shows with 5+ 120 second ad breaks. I instantly canceled and went an alternate route

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I cut the cord so I wouldn't have to watch commercials and there is no way in hell I am ever going back to them. And if they start having ads on all the services, I guess there will be a lot more piracy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Ipodjockey@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Jesus... Well time to get out the Bat'leths.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 months ago

Time to take up the life of an Orion Pirate

[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago

Ok, I have to ask. Wtf?

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago
[-] LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

That's a pretty good summary, thank you.

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

This is why I have a media server.

[-] Railing5132@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Paramount+ is such hot trash. I tried a free trial after Amazon Prime went apeshit with ads one day as I was finishing up DS9. The app kept crashing my FireTV, wouldn't play, would randomly change languages and the only solution was to "keep going back seasons and episodes until you find one in your preferred language and then just fast forward until the episode you want." I had to go back 3.5 seasons - I don't got time for that shit.

They asked me to complete a survey when I canceled the trial after 35 minutes. I was... not polite. I may have suggested that any programmers guilty of releasing code so incredibly damaged into a production environment should commit seppuku.

[-] numberfour002@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I may have suggested that any programmers guilty of releasing code so incredibly damaged into a production environment should commit seppuku.

To be honest, my anecdotal experience is that any feedback with this sort of nonsense is removed from the data set. It's pretty easy to spot and right or wrong, it would be considered noise or an outlier at best.

[-] Railing5132@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I'm certain it didn't get read, just as I'm certain any negative feedback gets similarly binned. It was far more catharsis for me than any misguided belief that anyone would see or even (lol) act to make their product better.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Spin up a jellyfin server, obtain the movies, copy to jellyfin.

Problem solved

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Way ahead of you...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

People still stream considering how insane the whole ecosystem is?

[-] DestroyerOfWorlds@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

Finished setup Jellyfin on a home server. roku, apple tv, and devices with swiftfin. was using plex, but they are going for the streaming profit model hard and probably worse than that soon. managed to find the TOS and TNG 4K remastered movies on usenet. hard drives are cheap and my ethernet is fast enough for 4k. whoo hooo....I mean, Arrrrrr!

QI'yaH, QI'yaH!

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I pretty much have to. Paramount+ never actually works whenever I have had a free trial. If they expect me to pay for something that doesn't even work, they're outta their fuckin' mind.

[-] derf82@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

There are lovely 4k blurays of all the movies.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
462 points (100.0% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3694 readers
750 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable, neither is supporting people who actively want to kill those groups. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS